
Cloud Vulnerability DB
コミュニティ主導の脆弱性データベース
CVE-2026-46556 is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in FlaskBB's get_image_info() function, triggered via an unrestricted avatar URL input. It affects all versions of FlaskBB up to and including 2.2.0, and allows any authenticated user to force the server to issue arbitrary HTTP requests to internal endpoints, including cloud metadata services such as AWS IMDSv1 (169.254.169.254). The vulnerability was published on May 19, 2026, and added to the GitHub Advisory Database on May 21, 2026. It carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 6.5 (Medium) (GitHub Advisory, FlaskBB Advisory).
The root cause is CWE-918 (Server-Side Request Forgery): in flaskbb/utils/helpers.py at line 571, the url parameter supplied by the user is passed directly to requests.get(url, stream=True) without any validation of scheme, host, or IP address. The attack chain begins when an authenticated user submits a malicious URL as their avatar via POST /user/settings/user-details; this triggers ValidateAvatarURL.validate() in validators.py:103, which calls check_image() in helpers.py:628, which in turn calls get_image_info(url) — ultimately issuing an unrestricted outbound HTTP GET request. Three exploitation channels are confirmed: direct server-side requests to internal endpoints, internal port scanning via distinct error codes (CONN_REFUSED, NO_CONTENT_LENGTH, TYPE_NOT_ALLOWED, SUCCESS), and triggering of internal APIs (e.g., Elasticsearch on 127.0.0.1:9200). A proof-of-concept archive (submit.zip) has been publicly released (GitHub Advisory, FlaskBB Advisory).
Successful exploitation primarily impacts confidentiality (CVSS Confidentiality: High), with no direct integrity or availability impact. Any authenticated FlaskBB user can leverage this vulnerability to exfiltrate cloud IAM credentials from metadata services (AWS, GCP, Azure), map internal network topology via port scanning, and interact with unauthenticated internal services such as Elasticsearch, etcd, Consul, or CI/CD webhook endpoints. On cloud-hosted deployments, leaked IAM credentials could enable lateral movement to other cloud resources and services beyond the FlaskBB instance itself (GitHub Advisory, FlaskBB Advisory).
Settings → User Details (endpoint: POST /user/settings/user-details).http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/ (AWS IMDSv1) or http://127.0.0.1:9200/_cat/indices (Elasticsearch).ValidateAvatarURL.validate() → check_image() → get_image_info() → requests.get(url), issuing a GET request to the attacker-specified internal endpoint.CONN_REFUSED, NO_CONTENT_LENGTH, TYPE_NOT_ALLOWED, SUCCESS) to map open ports and reachable services on the internal network.169.254.169.254, 169.254.170.2, metadata.google.internal, or 169.254.169.254 (cloud metadata IPs); connections to loopback (127.0.0.1) or RFC-1918 addresses on non-standard ports (e.g., 9200, 2379, 8500).POST /user/settings/user-details or POST /admin/users/<id>/edit with avatar URL values containing internal IP ranges or metadata service hostnames; application logs showing requests.get() calls to internal addresses.CONN_REFUSED or TYPE_NOT_ALLOWED for internal hosts.As of the advisory publication date (May 21, 2026), no patched version of FlaskBB has been released — the advisory lists "None" for patched versions, and all versions ≤ 2.2.0 are affected. Administrators should implement the following mitigations until an official patch is available: (1) restrict outbound HTTP requests from the FlaskBB server using firewall rules or egress filtering to block access to RFC-1918 addresses and cloud metadata IPs (169.254.169.254); (2) deploy an SSRF-aware proxy (e.g., using ssrf-proxy or network-level controls) to intercept and validate outbound requests; (3) consider disabling avatar URL functionality if not required. Monitor the FlaskBB repository for patch releases (GitHub Advisory, FlaskBB Advisory).
The vulnerability was reported by three researchers: woohyunchoi-kentech, programsurf, and yoonsh, and was published by the FlaskBB maintainer (sh4nks) via GitHub's security advisory process. A Loginsoft blog post on Medium referenced the vulnerability in the context of expanding enterprise attack surfaces from trusted software (Loginsoft Medium). No broader media coverage or significant social media discussion has been identified beyond the advisory and aggregator listings.
ソース: このレポートは AI を使用して生成されました
無料の脆弱性評価
9つのセキュリティドメインにわたるクラウドセキュリティプラクティスを評価して、リスクレベルをベンチマークし、防御のギャップを特定します。
パーソナライズされたデモを見る
"私が今まで見た中で最高のユーザーエクスペリエンスは、クラウドワークロードを完全に可視化します。"
"Wiz を使えば、クラウド環境で何が起こっているかを 1 つの画面で確認することができます"
"Wizが何かを重要視した場合、それは実際に重要であることを私たちは知っています。"