CVE-2026-84445
cAdvisor 脆弱性の分析と軽減

概要

CVE-2026-84445 is a Denial of Service vulnerability in gRPC-Go (the Go language implementation of gRPC) affecting servers created with xds.NewGRPCServer(). A remote attacker can send a crafted HTTP/2 RPC request omitting both the :authority and Host headers, triggering an index-out-of-bounds panic in the xDS routing interceptor that terminates the entire server process. Affected versions are gRPC-Go prior to 1.82.2 and versions 1.83.0–1.83.1; the issue was disclosed on August 25, 2026 via GitHub Security Advisory GHSA-2v4p-qf9q-27wj and published to NVD on September 14, 2026. It carries a CVSS v4.0 base score of 8.7 (High) (GitHub Advisory, Feedly).

技術的な詳細

The root cause is an improper validation of an array index (CWE-129) combined with an uncaught exception (CWE-248). In internal/transport/http2_server.go, the HTTP/2 server transport accepts incoming RPCs that carry neither the :authority pseudo-header nor the Host header — it only renames Host to :authority when Host is present, leaving :authority absent when both are missing. The xDS routing interceptor in internal/xds/server/routing.go (RouteAndProcess) then calls md.Get(":authority"), which returns an empty slice, and immediately indexes authority[0] under the assumption (documented in a code comment referencing gRPC proposal A41) that a valid authority is always present. Because the per-RPC goroutine has no recover() wrapping this code path, the resulting panic: runtime error: index out of range [0] with length 0 propagates and kills the entire server process. The vulnerability was originally discovered and reported to Google's OSS VRP by researcher winklemad before being filed publicly (GitHub Issue #9354, GitHub Advisory).

影響

Successful exploitation causes a complete, immediate Denial of Service: the entire gRPC server process terminates rather than just the affected RPC goroutine. In insecure or standard TLS deployments, any unauthenticated remote attacker with network access can trigger this crash with a single malformed request, making the attack highly automatable. In strict mTLS or ALTS deployments, the attacker must first possess valid transport credentials, significantly reducing the attack surface. There is no confidentiality or integrity impact — the vulnerability is purely an availability issue (GitHub Advisory, Feedly).

エクスプロイト可能性

No public proof-of-concept exploit code has been published, and there is no evidence of in-the-wild exploitation as of the time of disclosure (Feedly). The vulnerability is not listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog. The EPSS score is approximately 0.685%, reflecting a low but non-negligible probability of exploitation in the near term. The attack is network-accessible, requires no privileges, no user interaction, and no special attack complexity in insecure/TLS deployments, making it highly automatable (NVD SSVC marks it as "Automatable: yes") (Feedly).

エクスプロイテーションのステップ

  1. Reconnaissance: Identify internet-facing or network-accessible gRPC servers built with xds.NewGRPCServer() (xDS-enabled gRPC-Go servers). These are commonly found in Kubernetes/service-mesh environments using xDS control planes (e.g., Istio, Envoy-based setups). Check for gRPC-Go versions prior to 1.82.2 or between 1.83.0 and 1.83.1.
  2. Establish transport connection: Complete the HTTP/2 connection handshake with the target server. For insecure or standard TLS servers, this requires no credentials. For mTLS/ALTS servers, valid client certificates or ALTS credentials are required before the malformed RPC can reach the vulnerable code path.
  3. Craft malformed HTTP/2 request: Construct an HTTP/2 HEADERS frame that initiates a gRPC RPC but deliberately omits both the :authority pseudo-header and the Host header. Standard HTTP/2 clients can be modified (e.g., using golang.org/x/net/http2 or h2c libraries) to send such a frame, bypassing the normal client-side enforcement of these headers.
  4. Send the request: Transmit the crafted HEADERS frame to any gRPC endpoint on the vulnerable server. The transport layer accepts the request and dispatches it to the xDS routing interceptor.
  5. Trigger panic and crash: The RouteAndProcess function in internal/xds/server/routing.go calls md.Get(":authority") (returning an empty slice) and then accesses authority[0], triggering a Go runtime panic. Since no recover() exists in the serving goroutine, the panic propagates and terminates the entire server process, achieving a complete Denial of Service (GitHub Issue #9354, GitHub Advisory).

妥協の兆候

  • Logs: Go runtime panic output in server logs containing panic: runtime error: index out of range [0] with length 0 with a stack trace referencing internal/xds/server/routing.go (specifically RouteAndProcess) and xdsUnaryInterceptor or xdsStreamInterceptor.
  • Logs: Abrupt server process termination with no graceful shutdown log entries, potentially preceded by a single inbound connection event.
  • Network: Inbound HTTP/2 HEADERS frames to the gRPC server port that lack both :authority and Host headers — detectable via packet capture or HTTP/2-aware network inspection tools.
  • Process: Unexpected restart of the gRPC server process (e.g., container restarts in Kubernetes, systemd service restarts) without a corresponding application-level error or OOM event.
  • Metrics: Sudden drop to zero in gRPC server availability metrics or health check failures immediately following a single inbound connection from an unexpected source (GitHub Issue #9354).

軽減策と回避策

The fix is available in gRPC-Go versions 1.82.2 and 1.83.2; users on the 1.83.x branch should upgrade to 1.83.2, and users on the 1.82.x branch should upgrade to 1.82.2. The patch updates internal/transport/http2_server.go to reject requests missing both :authority and Host headers early (returning HTTP 400 / gRPC status Internal), and adds a defensive guard in internal/xds/server/routing.go. As a deployment-level workaround prior to patching, enforcing strict mTLS or ALTS at the transport layer significantly reduces the attack surface by requiring valid client credentials before the malformed RPC can reach the vulnerable interceptor. Downstream packages that embed gRPC-Go (e.g., CoreDNS, cert-manager, Vitess, InfluxDB, Telegraf, and various Azure Linux packages) should also be updated to versions that incorporate the patched gRPC-Go dependency (GitHub Advisory, GitHub PR #9365).

コミュニティの反応

The vulnerability was originally reported to Google's OSS VRP (issue 551288012) by researcher winklemad, who noted it was classified as a product vulnerability not eligible for a reward under the project's tier, leading to a public GitHub issue filing. The gRPC-Go maintainers responded promptly, merging the fix and backporting it to the 1.82.x and 1.83.x branches on the same day (August 25, 2026). The issue attracted broad attention in the Go ecosystem, with numerous downstream projects (Kubernetes, Apache Pulsar, Forgejo, and others) rapidly opening dependency-bump PRs referencing the security fix (GitHub Issue #9354, GitHub PR #9365).

関連情報

Linuxディストリビューションの修正状況

主要なLinuxディストリビューションおよびそのリリースにおける修正の提供状況。

Debian

影響

bookworm

golang-google-grpc

影響

sid

golang-google-grpc

影響

trixie

golang-google-grpc

影響

Ubuntu

不明

devel

golang-github-googlecloudplatform-grpc-gcp-go

不明

RHEL / CentOS

影響

OpenShift

conmon.src

影響

RHEL 8

container-tools:rhel8/buildah.src

影響

RHEL 9

buildah.src

影響

RHEL 10

buildah.src

影響

ソースこのレポートは AI を使用して生成されました

関連 cAdvisor 脆弱 性:

CVE 識別子

重大度

スコア

テクノロジー

コンポーネント名

CISA KEV エクスプロイト

修正あり

公開日

CVE-2026-84445HIGH8.7
  • cAdvisor logocAdvisor
  • paketo-buildpacks-cpython-1.18.40
いいえはいSep 14, 2026
CVE-2026-84304HIGH8.7
  • cAdvisor logocAdvisor
  • signoz-otel-collector-fips
いいえはいSep 01, 2026
CVE-2026-56865HIGH8.4
  • Go logoGo
  • dex
いいえはいAug 13, 2026
CVE-2026-56864HIGH7.5
  • Go logoGo
  • dragonfly-operator-1.5
いいえはいAug 13, 2026
CVE-2026-84303MEDIUM6.3
  • cAdvisor logocAdvisor
  • argo-workflow-controller-fips-4.1
いいえはいSep 01, 2026

無料の脆弱性評価

クラウドセキュリティポスチャーのベンチマーク

9つのセキュリティドメインにわたるクラウドセキュリティプラクティスを評価して、リスクレベルをベンチマークし、防御のギャップを特定します。

評価を依頼する

パーソナライズされたデモを見る

実際に Wiz を見てみませんか?​

"私が今まで見た中で最高のユーザーエクスペリエンスは、クラウドワークロードを完全に可視化します。"
デビッド・エストリックCISO (最高情報責任者)
"Wiz を使えば、クラウド環境で何が起こっているかを 1 つの画面で確認することができます"
アダム・フレッチャーチーフ・セキュリティ・オフィサー
"Wizが何かを重要視した場合、それは実際に重要であることを私たちは知っています。"
グレッグ・ポニャトフスキ脅威および脆弱性管理責任者