What is DAST scanning? A cloud security perspective

Wiz エキスパートチーム
Key takeaways
  • Dynamic application security testing (DAST) identifies vulnerabilities in running applications by simulating real-world attacks from an external perspective.

  • Runtime detection allows DAST to find issues like authentication flaws and server misconfigurations that static analysis tools miss.

  • Cloud-native environments require DAST to validate security across constantly changing deployments and updates.

  • Comprehensive security relies on combining DAST with other testing methods like SAST, SCA, and IaC scanning.

What is DAST scanning?

DAST scanning is an automated security testing method that analyzes your running applications from the outside. It interacts with the application just like a real user or attacker would to find security weaknesses, complementing other application security testing approaches in your DevSecOps pipeline.

This method uses a "black-box" testing approach. This means the DAST tool does not have access to your source code or internal system details. Instead, it sends various inputs to your application and observes how it responds to identify potential vulnerabilities.

DAST identifies issues by injecting malicious payloads into the application's interface. It analyzes the responses to detect security flaws such as SQL injection or cross-site scripting (XSS).

This contrasts with white-box testing (such as SAST), which analyzes source code and internal system structures to identify bugs. DAST is a black-box approach that evaluates only the running application's behavior. Gray-box testing combines both approaches, using limited internal knowledge alongside external testing to achieve deeper coverage.

Because it tests the running application, DAST is excellent at detecting runtime-specific issues. These include authentication bypasses, session management flaws, and server misconfigurations that code analysis cannot see.

DAST is highly relevant for securing web applications, APIs, and modern cloud-native applications. Industry reports, including HCL's 2024 Application Security Testing Trends study, indicate continued adoption of DAST across enterprises as teams seek runtime validation of their security controls.

Secure Coding Best Practices [Cheat Sheet]

With curated insights and easy-to-follow code snippets, this 11-page cheat sheet simplifies complex security concepts, empowering every developer to build secure, reliable applications.

How DAST scanning works

The DAST process begins with a crawling phase. The tool maps out the application's structure, discovering pages, endpoints, and user workflows to understand the attack surface.

Next, the tool enters the attack simulation phase. It injects malicious payloads into input fields, URL parameters, and headers to test for vulnerabilities.

The tool then analyzes the application's responses to these attacks. It looks for error messages, unexpected behaviors, or successful executions of malicious code that indicate a vulnerability exists.

After the scan, the tool generates a report. This report prioritizes findings based on their severity and how easily they can be exploited, helping teams focus on the most critical risks.

Modern DAST tools integrate directly with CI/CD pipelines. This allows for automated scanning during deployment cycles, ensuring security checks happen continuously.

Handling authentication is a critical part of this process. The scanner must be able to log in to the application to test protected areas that are not publicly accessible.

DAST vs. SAST, IAST, and RASP: Choosing the right approach

Understanding how DAST compares to other application security testing methods helps you build comprehensive coverage:

SAST (Static Application Security Testing) analyzes source code, bytecode, or binaries without executing the application. SAST finds coding errors, insecure functions, and logic flaws early in development. It provides exact line numbers for fixes but cannot detect runtime or configuration issues. Use SAST during code review and commit stages.

IAST (Interactive Application Security Testing) instruments the application with agents that monitor behavior during testing or QA. IAST combines code-level visibility with runtime context, producing fewer false positives than SAST or DAST alone. However, it requires agent deployment and may impact application performance. Use IAST in pre-production environments where you control the infrastructure.

RASP (Runtime Application Self-Protection) embeds security controls directly into the running application to detect and block attacks in real time. RASP provides production protection but requires careful tuning to avoid blocking legitimate traffic. Use RASP as a compensating control for known vulnerabilities that cannot be immediately patched.

DAST tests the running application from an external perspective without code access or instrumentation. It validates that security controls work in realistic conditions and finds configuration issues that other methods miss. DAST produces some false positives and cannot test unexecuted code paths. Use DAST before production deployment and continuously in staging environments.

Most mature security programs use multiple methods: SAST for early detection, IAST for pre-production validation, DAST for external verification, and RASP for runtime protection.

The role of DAST in modern application security

DAST serves as a critical validation layer within the software development lifecycle (SDLC). It acts as a final quality check to ensure the running application is secure before it reaches production.

It complements Static Application Security Testing (SAST) by finding different types of flaws. While SAST finds coding errors, DAST detects runtime vulnerabilities that static analysis cannot identify.

DAST is essential for validating runtime configuration issues at the application layer. It can identify misconfigured security headers, exposed API endpoints, and authentication bypasses that only appear when the application is live. For comprehensive coverage, combine DAST with network exposure scanning to assess open ports and network-level misconfigurations.

This testing method validates that your security controls are working correctly. It tests authentication, authorization, and input validation mechanisms to help confirm these controls work as intended. This validation is critical because application-layer weaknesses remain a frequent root cause of security incidents, as documented across multiple industry breach reports and vulnerability databases.

DAST supports the shift-left security movement by integrating into continuous testing. Automated scans provide quick feedback to developers, allowing them to fix runtime issues early in the process alongside vulnerability management workflows.

Finally, DAST is valuable for checking third-party components and APIs. It can identify vulnerabilities introduced by external libraries or services that you do not control.

DAST for compliance and regulatory requirements

DAST scanning helps organizations demonstrate security due diligence across multiple compliance frameworks:

PCI DSS 4.0 (Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard):

  • Requirement 6.4.2 mandates application security testing for custom code

  • Requirement 11.6.1 requires vulnerability management processes

  • DAST provides evidence of ongoing security testing for systems handling cardholder data

SOC 2 Type II (Service Organization Control):

  • CC7.1 (Change Management) requires security testing before production deployment

  • CC7.2 (System Monitoring) benefits from continuous DAST scanning evidence

  • DAST reports demonstrate control effectiveness for auditors

ISO 27001:2022:

  • Control 8.25 (Secure Development Lifecycle) requires security testing throughout development

  • Control 8.8 (Management of Technical Vulnerabilities) mandates vulnerability assessment

  • DAST provides documented evidence of application security testing

HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act):

  • §164.308(a)(8) requires periodic technical and non-technical evaluations

  • DAST helps satisfy addressable specifications for security testing

  • Regular scans demonstrate ongoing risk assessment for protected health information (PHI)

NIST Cybersecurity Framework:

  • DE.CM-8 (Detection Processes) benefits from DAST's vulnerability detection

  • PR.IP-12 (Secure Development) requires security testing in development processes

  • DAST supports both Detect and Protect functions

Important note: DAST is a supporting tool for compliance, not a complete control by itself. Combine DAST with SAST, SCA, penetration testing, and security reviews to build comprehensive evidence for auditors.

DAST scanning benefits and limitations

Benefits

  • Runtime vulnerability detection: DAST identifies security flaws that only manifest when the application is actually running.

  • Attacker's perspective: It tests applications from the outside, simulating how a real hacker would probe your system.

  • Configuration detection: The tool spots environment-specific issues, such as server misconfigurations, that code scanners miss.

  • Control validation: DAST verifies that security measures like firewalls and authentication are functioning as intended in production.

  • Compliance support: Regular DAST scans help organizations meet regulatory requirements for security testing and risk assessment., such as PCI DSS 4.0 which now mandates DAST for cardholder data systems.

  • Third-party testing: It enables security checks on third-party applications and components where you do not have access to the source code.

Limitations

  • Unexecuted code: DAST cannot detect vulnerabilities in code paths or features that the scanner does not execute.

  • False positives: The tool may flag non-existent issues, requiring manual verification to confirm actual risks.

  • Slower execution: DAST scans take longer than static analysis because they require the application to run and respond to requests.

  • Limited context: Reports often lack specific code-level details, making it harder for developers to pinpoint the exact location of a fix.

  • Authentication challenges: Scanning applications with complex login flows or multi-factor authentication can be difficult to automate.

  • Incomplete coverage: Achieving 100% code coverage is difficult through external testing alone, leaving some internal logic untested.

DAST integration challenges in cloud-native environments

Scanning ephemeral infrastructure presents a major challenge. Cloud resources like containers and virtual machines are constantly created and destroyed, making it hard for scanners to track targets.

Container-based applications and microservices architectures add complexity. An application may consist of dozens of services communicating internally, which traditional external scanners might not fully reach. Unifying external findings with internal service topology helps you see which exposed routes actually lead to sensitive services and data. This graph-based approach shows how an externally discovered vulnerability connects through your microservices mesh to reach databases, secrets, or privileged workloads—transforming isolated findings into actionable attack path intelligence.

Authentication in distributed systems is often complicated. Managing credentials for scanners across multiple identity providers and services can be a significant operational hurdle.

Event-driven serverless functions triggered by queues, storage events, or database changes can be difficult to scan with HTTP-centric DAST tools. However, HTTP-fronted serverless functions exposed through API Gateway, Application Load Balancer, or similar services can be tested effectively with standard DAST approaches.

You also need environment-specific configurations. Scanners must be tuned differently for development, staging, and production environments to avoid disrupting live services.

API security testing is critical in cloud-native applications but requires specialized approaches. Modern DAST tools must handle API-specific challenges:

Schema-aware testing:

  • Import OpenAPI (Swagger) or GraphQL schemas to understand valid endpoints, parameters, and data types

  • Use schema definitions to generate intelligent test cases that explore edge cases and boundary conditions

  • Validate API responses against schemas to detect unexpected behaviors

Authentication and authorization:

  • Test OAuth 2.0 flows including client credentials, authorization code, and implicit grants

  • Validate JWT token handling, expiration, and signature verification

  • Check API key scoping and rotation mechanisms

  • Test role-based access control (RBAC) across different user privilege levels

API-specific vulnerabilities:

  • Test for OWASP API Security Top 10 issues including broken object-level authorization (BOLA), excessive data exposure, and lack of rate limiting

  • Validate input sanitization for JSON, XML, and other data formats

  • Test pagination, filtering, and sorting parameters for injection vulnerabilities

  • Check for mass assignment vulnerabilities where APIs accept unexpected parameters

GraphQL considerations:

  • Test for query depth and complexity limits to prevent denial-of-service

  • Validate field-level authorization across nested queries

  • Check for introspection exposure in production environments

  • Test batching and aliasing for authorization bypass

Operational considerations:

  • Avoid mutating production data by using read-only test accounts or synthetic data

  • Respect rate limits and implement backoff strategies

  • Test idempotency to ensure repeated requests don't cause unintended side effects

Finally, operational factors like rate limiting and auto-scaling can interfere with scans. Aggressive scanning might trigger auto-scaling events or get blocked by rate limits, skewing results.

Best practices for effective DAST implementation

  • Integrate early: Add DAST scans to the early stages of your CI/CD pipeline to catch issues without slowing down deployment velocity.

  • Configure authentication: Ensure your scanner has valid credentials to test protected application areas and uncover deeper vulnerabilities.

  • Establish baselines: Run initial scans to create a security baseline, allowing you to track vulnerability trends and improvements over time.

  • Prioritize findings: Focus remediation efforts on exposures with real attack paths—for example, internet-exposed routes connected to workloads with excessive IAM privileges, access to sensitive data stores, or unpatched critical vulnerabilities. Isolated findings in internal services with strict network segmentation and least-privilege access pose lower immediate risk. Context-driven prioritization helps teams focus on vulnerabilities that attackers can actually chain together to reach critical assets.

  • Combine approaches: Use DAST alongside SAST, SCA, and IaC scanning to achieve comprehensive coverage across your entire application stack. Consider CNAPP platforms that unify these testing methods with cloud context for better prioritization.

  • Use targeted scans: Run shorter scans focused on changed routes, endpoints, or critical user flows to provide quick feedback to developers. Schedule comprehensive full scans regularly to ensure complete coverage of your application's attack surface.

  • Handle exceptions: Create a process for managing false positives and accepting specific risks to keep scan reports clean and actionable.

  • Update rules: Keep your scanning tools updated with the latest vulnerability signatures and rules to detect new threats.

  • Assign ownership: Clearly define who is responsible for fixing vulnerabilities and establish Service Level Agreements (SLAs) for remediation.

  • Educate teams: Use insights from DAST results to train developers on secure coding practices and prevent recurring issues.

How Wiz transforms DAST scanning with cloud-native context

Wiz Code provides comprehensive application security by integrating SAST, SCA, secrets detection, and IaC scanning directly into your development workflow. When combined with Wiz's runtime capabilities, you get complete visibility from code to cloud.

Wiz Attack Surface Management (ASM) adds outside-in validation—discovering and validating exploitable exposures across cloud infrastructure, SaaS applications, AI services, on-premises systems, and APIs. ASM goes beyond known applications to continuously discover shadow IT, forgotten test environments, and newly deployed services that expand your attack surface.

Wiz discovers APIs across your environment, validates external exposure, and probes endpoints to identify OWASP API Top 10 vulnerabilities and misconfigurations.This unified approach ensures you're testing all APIs—including shadow APIs and undocumented endpoints—not just the ones you know about.

The Wiz Security Graph correlates external findings with internal cloud context—including IAM permissions, network paths, data access, and runtime behavior. This allows teams to prioritize truly exploitable attack paths over isolated issues. For example, an exposed API endpoint with a medium-severity vulnerability becomes critical when the graph shows it has admin permissions to production databases and is actively processing customer data.

Code-to-cloud correlation traces runtime exposures back to the source code scanned by Wiz Code. You can identify the specific repository, pull request, and developer responsible, enabling faster remediation with full context from the vulnerability's introduction to its exploitation potential.

Wiz Defend provides runtime detection and automated investigation, helping validate whether externally identified exposures are being probed or exploited in real time.When suspicious activity is detected, Defend automatically correlates it with vulnerability data from Wiz Code, attack paths, and cloud context to accelerate incident response and reduce mean time to resolution (MTTR).

Wiz also analyzes toxic combinations. It identifies when external exposures combine with code-level vulnerabilities and internal risks, like excessive permissions, to create critical threats that require immediate attention.

This integrated approach elevates traditional DAST from simple vulnerability detection to context-aware risk management across your entire development and deployment lifecycle. Get a personalized demo to see how Wiz unifies code security, cloud context, and runtime protection.

Secure your cloud from code to production

Learn why CISOs at the fastest growing companies trust Wiz to accelerate secure cloud development.

Wiz がお客様の個人データをどのように取り扱うかについては、当社のプライバシーポリシーをご確認下さい: プライバシーポリシー.