취약성 데이터베이스GHSA-r292-9mhp-454m

GHSA-r292-9mhp-454m
JavaScript 취약성 분석 및 완화

Summary

node-tar (npm tar) contains an uncontrolled-recursion stack-exhaustion DoS in the internal mapHas helper used by filesFilter. When a consumer calls tar.t(...) or tar.x(...) with a non-empty member-selection list, node-tar installs a filter that closes over the recursive mapHas (src/list.ts:33-44). mapHas walks an entry path upward one path.dirname() call per recursion with no segment cap. A single crafted tar with a GNU-L (or PAX-x) long-path header can deliver a path of tens of thousands of /-separated segments (up to maxMetaEntrySize = 1 MiB). The recursion overflows the call stack, throwing an uncatchable RangeError that terminates the Node process on async/streaming consumers.

Root Cause

filesFilter (src/list.ts:27-51) is installed whenever a caller passes a member-selection list (src/list.ts:119-122, src/extract.ts:55-57). Its filter is invoked at src/parse.ts:253 (entry.ignore = entry.ignore || !this.filter(entry.path, entry)) inside Parser[CONSUMEHEADER] — and crucially outside the only try/catch in that method (which wraps new Header at src/parse.ts:179-183). mapHas recurses once per path segment with no depth limit. The Unpack maxDepth guard (src/unpack.ts:342, in [CHECKPATH]) only runs on the 'entry' event, which fires after CONSUMEHEADER has already invoked the filter — so the stack overflows before any depth guard executes. tar.t (list) has no maxDepth at all.

Impact

Unauthenticated, remotely-triggerable denial of service: a ~188-byte gzip (≈26 KB tar) crashes any service that lists or extracts selected members from an untrusted archive (package registries, CI artifact/cache restore, upload processors). On async (await tar.t(...)/tar.x(...)) and streaming/pipe consumers the RangeError escapes the promise as an uncaughtException and terminates the process — standard defensive try/catch around the async call does NOT prevent it. (The synchronous API is catchable; the async/stream paths — the dominant server pattern — are not.)

Proof of Concept

// Build a tar whose single entry has a GNU-L long path of ~12,000 "a/" segments (~26 KB),
// gzip it (≈188 bytes), then have a consumer list/extract with member selection:
const tar = require('tar');
await tar.t({ file: 'evil.tar.gz', gzip: true }, ['some-member']); // -> RangeError, process exit

Empirically reproduced on Node v24.18.0 against built dist/commonjs of node-tar 7.5.20: 188-byte gzip → 26,112-byte tar (12,000 segments) → uncaught RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded → process exit. A control run with no member-selection list (filter not installed) parses cleanly (exit 0), isolating mapHas as the sole cause.

Attack Chain

  1. Entry. Attacker crafts a tar with a GNU L (or PAX x) long-path header whose body is "a/"×~12000 (~26 KB), followed by a normal file entry.
    • Guard: maxMetaEntrySize caps the meta body at 1 MiB (src/parse.ts:241).
    • Bypass proof: 26 KB ≪ 1 MiB → accepted (verified: 26 KB archive parsed up to the filter).
  2. Trigger. Victim service calls tar.t({file},[sel]) or tar.x({file,cwd},[sel]) (member selection — a documented, common API).
    • Guard: Unpack.maxDepth (default 1024) at src/unpack.ts:342; decompression-ratio guard.
    • Bypass proof: maxDepth lives in [CHECKPATH] on the 'entry' event, which fires after CONSUMEHEADER's filter call — the crash occurs before it (extract exits 1 with default maxDepth). tar.t has no maxDepth. Ratio is ~139× (trivial); no total-bytes cap applies to the uncompressed meta body.
  3. Sink. this.filter(entry.path)mapHas recurses once per / segment (src/list.ts:39).
    • Guard: try/catch in CONSUMEHEADER.
    • Bypass proof: the only try/catch wraps new Header (src/parse.ts:179-183); the this.filter(...) call at src/parse.ts:253 is outside it. The RangeError propagates out of the stream write/'data' path → uncaught exception (verified: process.on('uncaughtException') fires; async await+try/catch does NOT intercept).
  4. Impact. Node process termination; a 188-byte gzip crashes any consumer that lists/extracts selected members from untrusted archives.

Bypass Evidence

  • mapHas recursion is member-name-independent: the crash fires even when the requested members do not match the malicious entry path — the attacker only needs the consumer to use member selection.
  • Standalone mapHas overflows at 20k–30k segments; on the real streaming path (atop write → CONSUMECHUNK → CONSUMEHEADER → filter) it crashes at ≤8k segments (finder's ~12k estimate is accurate for the reachable path).
  • Control (no member list → no filter) parses cleanly (exit 0), isolating mapHas.

Affected Versions

<= 7.5.20 (npm tar). mapHas present verbatim on tag v7.5.20 (latest GitHub release and npm dist-tag latest); no segment/depth cap in src/list.ts or the CONSUMEHEADER filter path; HEAD == 7.5.20, no unreleased fix.

Suggested Fix

Rewrite mapHas iteratively (walk dirname in a while loop with a segment/visited cap), or enforce a hard path-segment limit in Header/Parser independent of maxMetaEntrySize, applied before any per-entry filter runs.

Dedup Note

Distinct from CVE-2024-28863 / GHSA-f5x3-32g6-qm9j "lack of folders depth validation" (that bounds mkdir recursion during extraction via maxDepth in Unpack[CHECKPATH] on the 'entry' event — a different sink, code path, and fix; runs after the filter and does not apply to tar.t). Also distinct from the PAX NUL/numeric-path crash advisories (improper-input-to-fs / type confusion, not recursion) and the gzip-bomb advisory (resource exhaustion on disk writes). None touch list.ts/filesFilter/mapHas or require member selection.

Reported by zx (Jace) — GitHub: @manus-use


근원네비디(NVD)

관련 JavaScript 취약점:

CVE ID

심각도

점수

기술

구성 요소 이름

CISA KEV 익스플로잇

수정 사항이 있습니다.

게시된 날짜

GHSA-w28w-gp39-m4p6CRITICAL10
  • JavaScript logoJavaScript
  • @prompty/core
아니요Jul 24, 2026
GHSA-pm4m-ph32-ghv5HIGH7.5
  • JavaScript logoJavaScript
  • js-yaml
아니요Jul 24, 2026
GHSA-r28c-9q8g-f849HIGH7.5
  • JavaScript logoJavaScript
  • postcss
아니요Jul 24, 2026
GHSA-r292-9mhp-454mMEDIUM5.3
  • JavaScript logoJavaScript
  • tar
아니요Jul 24, 2026
GHSA-464c-974j-9xm6LOW3.3
  • JavaScript logoJavaScript
  • github.com/aws/aws-cdk-go/awscdk/v2
아니요Jul 24, 2026

무료 취약성 평가

클라우드 보안 태세를 벤치마킹합니다

9개의 보안 도메인에서 클라우드 보안 관행을 평가하여 위험 수준을 벤치마킹하고 방어의 허점을 식별합니다.

평가 요청

추가 Wiz 리소스

맞춤형 데모 받기

맞춤형 데모 신청하기

"내가 본 최고의 사용자 경험은 클라우드 워크로드에 대한 완전한 가시성을 제공합니다."
데이비드 에슬릭최고정보책임자(CISO)
"Wiz는 클라우드 환경에서 무슨 일이 일어나고 있는지 볼 수 있는 단일 창을 제공합니다."
아담 플레처최고 보안 책임자(CSO)
"우리는 Wiz가 무언가를 중요한 것으로 식별하면 실제로 중요하다는 것을 알고 있습니다."
그렉 포니아토프스키위협 및 취약성 관리 책임자