What is Docker vulnerability scanning?

Team di esperti Wiz
Key takeaways
  • Automated security checks: Docker vulnerability scanning automatically identifies security flaws, misconfigurations, and exposed secrets in container images at rest. Runtime threat detection complements image scanning by monitoring active containers for exploitation attempts and configuration drift.

  • Shift-left security: Scanning early in the CI/CD pipeline allows you to catch and fix issues before deployment, reducing the risk of security incidents in production.

  • Continuous protection: Continuous scanning across registries detects newly disclosed vulnerabilities within hours of publication. Runtime monitoring complements scanning by detecting behavioral indicators of zero-day exploitation, such as unexpected process execution or network connections.

  • Comprehensive coverage: Effective security requires scanning both base images and application dependencies while using automated policies to block risky images.

What is Docker vulnerability scanning?

Docker vulnerability scanning is the automated process of analyzing container images to find known security weaknesses. This process identifies issues such as outdated software packages, insecure configurations, and exposed secrets before you deploy them.

When you build a container, you create it using multiple image layers. These layers contain the operating system, libraries, and your application code. A scanner inspects these layers to create a detailed inventory of every component inside the image.

It is important to distinguish between two complementary security approaches. Image analysis examines container images at rest—in registries, CI/CD pipelines, or local storage—to identify known vulnerabilities before deployment. Runtime analysis monitors active containers to detect configuration drift, exploit attempts, and behavioral anomalies that emerge after deployment.

Scanners compare the inventory of your image against vulnerability sources including the National Vulnerability Database (NVD), distribution advisories (Alpine secdb, Ubuntu USNs, Red Hat OVAL), and CVE identifiers. Each source provides severity scores, affected versions, and remediation guidance. If a component matches a known flaw, the scanner flags it and provides details on severity and remediation. This process spans the entire container lifecycle, covering the build phase, storage in registries, and active runtime environments.

Container Security Best Practices [Cheat Sheet]

Strengthen container security across build, deploy, and runtime stages using battle-tested techniques.

Image scanning vs runtime detection

AspectImage ScanningRuntime Detection
TimingBefore deployment (CI/CD, registries)During execution (active containers)
Detection methodStatic analysis of image layersBehavioral monitoring (process, network, file)
FindsKnown CVEs, misconfigurationsExploits, drift, anomalies

Why Docker vulnerability scanning matters for cloud security

Containers are ephemeral, meaning they spin up and shut down rapidly—60% live for one minute or less. A single vulnerable image can propagate a security flaw across thousands of containers in minutes.

This risk is amplified by the container supply chain. Vulnerabilities in a base image affect every application built on top of it. If your base image has a flaw, all downstream containers inherit that risk immediately.

Manual security checks cannot keep up with the scale of modern cloud environments. Organizations running thousands of containers need automated scanning to identify and prioritize risks effectively. This automation helps satisfy compliance objectives for frameworks like PCIDSS 4.0 (Requirement 6.3.2), HIPAA (164.308(a)(1)(ii)(A)), and SOC 2 (CC7.2), which expect risk-based vulnerability management and secure software development practices.

Investing in preventive scanning is far more cost-effective than dealing with a breach. Copper Technologies used Wiz's agentless scanning to gain visibility into their production environments. This allowed them to identify and eliminate critical vulnerabilities without disrupting their workflows.

How Docker vulnerability scanning works

The scanning process begins with image analysis. The scanner unpacks the image layers and examines the file system to identify all installed packages and configurations.

Next, the tool performs dependency resolution. It detects both direct dependencies that you installed and transitive dependencies that your software relies on. This creates a complete picture of the software supply chain within the container, which averages 389 software components.

The scanner then performs a matching process. It compares the discovered packages and versions against comprehensive vulnerability databases. This step identifies which components have known security flaws.

Once vulnerabilities are identified, the tool assigns a severity rating using CVSS scores (0-10 scale based on impact and exploitability characteristics). Advanced scanners layer additional context—known exploits in the wild, reachable code paths, and network exposure—to prioritize which vulnerabilities pose actual risk in your environment. Finally, the scanner generates a report that prioritizes risks and provides guidance on how to fix them.

Types of vulnerabilities detected in Docker images

  • Operating system vulnerabilities: These are flaws found in base OS packages like Ubuntu, Alpine, or Red Hat.

  • Application dependencies: These are security issues within language-specific libraries, such as those installed via npm, pip, or Maven.

  • Configuration weaknesses: These include insecure settings like running containers as root or leaving ports unnecessarily exposed—containers average 4.8 misconfigurations.

  • Secrets exposure: This refers to sensitive data like API keys, passwords, or certificates that are accidentally hardcoded into the image.

  • Malware detection: Scanners can identify malicious code, backdoors, or crypto miners injected into container images.

  • License compliance issues: This identifies open-source components with restrictive licenses that may violate your organization's policies.

Docker vulnerability scanning best practices

  • Scan early and often: Integrate scanning directly into your CI/CD pipelines to catch vulnerabilities before images are pushed to registries.

  • Use minimal base images: Prefer slim or hardened base images to reduce attack surface. Distroless images (no shell, no package manager) offer maximum reduction but complicate debugging and may affect scanner accuracy. Alpine Linux provides a middle ground with a 5MB base and full package manager. Choose based on your debugging needs and security requirements.

  • Implement policy-based gates: Configure your pipeline to automatically block the deployment of images that contain critical vulnerabilities.

  • Scan registries continuously: Vulnerabilities are discovered daily, so you must continuously re-scan images stored in your registries.

  • Prioritize based on context: Focus on exploitable vulnerabilities in containers with multiple risk factors—internet exposure, privileged execution, access to sensitive data (PII, credentials, financial records), lateral movement paths to critical systems, or excessive IAM permissions. A medium-severity vulnerability in an internet-facing container with database access poses higher risk than a critical vulnerability in an isolated dev environment.

  • Automate remediation workflows: Connect your scanning tools to ticketing systems to automatically assign fixes to the right developers.

  • Maintain image hygiene: Rebuild images weekly or when base image updates are released. Pin dependency versions in package manifests (package.json, requirements.txt, pom.xml) to ensure reproducible builds. Retire base images within 30 days of reaching end-of-life. Tag images with build dates and commit SHAs to track freshness.

Common challenges with Docker vulnerability scanning

  • Alert fatigue: Scanners often produce thousands of findings, many of which may not be exploitable in your specific environment.

  • False positives: Scanners may report vulnerabilities that don't exist in the final image due to multi-stage builds (where vulnerable packages are discarded), vendored dependencies (copied without package metadata), or misidentified package versions. For example, a scanner might flag a vulnerability in a build-stage compiler that never reaches the runtime image. Review findings against your actual deployed layers.

  • Performance impact: Scanning large images or high volumes of containers can slow down build pipelines and create bottlenecks.

  • Coverage gaps: Some scanners fail to detect vulnerabilities in specific programming languages or private package repositories.

  • Remediation complexity: Fixing a vulnerability often requires updating a base image or rebuilding complex dependency chains.

  • Tool sprawl: Using different tools for development, registries, and runtime creates fragmented visibility and makes management difficult.

  • Developer friction: Blocking deployments without providing clear remediation guidance frustrates development teams and slows down innovation.

Evaluating Docker vulnerability scanning solutions

  • Detection capabilities: Ensure the solution covers OS packages, application dependencies, and configuration issues comprehensively.

  • Accuracy and reliability: Look for a tool with a low false positive rate and accurate version detection to build trust with your engineering team.

  • Integration options: The solution should seamlessly integrate with your CI/CD pipelines, container registries, and orchestration platforms.

  • Contextual analysis: Choose a tool that prioritizes vulnerabilities based on runtime exposure, network reachability, and business impact.

  • Remediation guidance: The tool should provide clear, actionable fix recommendations and automated patching capabilities.

  • Performance and scalability: The scanner must be fast enough to handle large repositories without slowing down your development cycles.

  • Reporting and compliance: Look for reports that map findings to specific framework controls—PCI DSS 4.0 Requirement 6.3.2 (secure development), SOC 2 CC7.2 (system monitoring), ISO 27001 A.12.6.1 (vulnerability management). Reports should include scan timestamps, remediation tracking, exception approvals with expiration dates, and exportable evidence packages for auditors.

  • SBOM and attestations: Ensure the solution generates SBOMs in standard formats (SPDX 2.3, CycloneDX 1.5) and supports supply chain attestations—build provenance (SLSA), cryptographic signatures (Sigstore/cosign), and vulnerability disclosure statements. SBOMs enable downstream consumers to assess your software's risk, while attestations prove image integrity and build authenticity.

How Wiz strengthens Docker container security

Wiz provides agentless vulnerability scanning across container images and cloud workloads, with optional lightweight eBPF-based runtime sensors for real-time threat detection. The agentless approach analyzes workload snapshots without installing agents, while the runtime sensor monitors process execution, network connections, and file access to detect active exploitation attempts.

The Wiz Security Graph correlates container vulnerabilities with runtime exposure, network paths, and secrets. This allows you to prioritize toxic combinations that create real attack paths rather than chasing every minor alert.

Wiz traces vulnerable containers back to their source repositories and developers. This eliminates the manual work of finding owners and accelerates the remediation process.

WizOS offers hardened container base images that are maintained at near-zero CVEs. These images come with SLA-backed vulnerability remediation, significantly reducing your attack surface from day one.

The unified policy engine enforces guardrails in CI/CD pipelines to prevent risky images from reaching production. In runtime, Wiz continuously reassesses workloads for newly disclosed vulnerabilities and uses behavioral monitoring to detect exploitation attempts—unexpected process execution, suspicious network connections, or unauthorized file access.

Attack path analysis goes beyond simple CVSS scores. It shows you which vulnerabilities actually threaten critical assets in your specific environment. This contextual approach eliminates noise and focuses your team on the genuine, exploitable threats that matter most. 

Get a demo to see how Wiz can strengthen your container security posture.

FAQs about Docker vulnerability scanning