Understanding GDPR security controls and Article 32 requirements
GDPR security controls are the mandatory technical and organizational safeguards you must implement to protect the personal data you process. Article 32 of the General Data Protection Regulation requires both data controllers and data processors to implement "appropriate technical and organizational measures" to ensure a level of security appropriate to the risk. The regulation mandates that organizations evaluate the state of the art, implementation costs, and the nature, scope, context, and purposes of processing when selecting controls.
These controls protect four core pillars of data security. Confidentiality ensures data is accessible only to authorized individuals. Integrity maintains the accuracy and completeness of data. Availability ensures authorized users can access data when needed. Resilience gives systems the ability to withstand and recover from failures.
The regulation emphasizes a risk-based approach, meaning the specific controls you implement must be proportional to the potential risks to the rights and freedoms of individuals whose data you're processing. This GDPR compliance framework should integrate with and enhance your existing security programs. You'll need to evaluate current security practices against GDPR's principles, identify gaps, and adapt controls to meet the regulation's standards.
A Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) is a systematic process under Article 35 for identifying and minimizing data protection risks in processing operations that are likely to result in high risk to individuals' rights and freedoms.
Data Goverance & Compliance Guide
Navigate the complexities of GDPR and cloud compliance with practical strategies and real-world examples.
Article 32 security control checklist for implementation
Article 32 requires specific categories of technical and organizational measures. Use this checklist to ensure comprehensive coverage:
Encryption and pseudonymization (Article 32(1)(a)):
Encrypt personal data at rest using AES-256 or equivalent
Encrypt data in transit using TLS 1.2 or higher
Implement pseudonymization for analytics and testing environments
Maintain secure key management with rotation policies
Access control and least privilege:
Implement role-based access control (RBAC) for all systems processing personal data
Enforce multi-factor authentication for privileged accounts
Review and recertify access permissions quarterly
Log all access to personal data with tamper-proof audit trails
Backup and restoration capabilities (Article 32(1)(c)):
Maintain encrypted backups with defined recovery time objectives (RTOs)
Test restoration procedures at least annually
Document business continuity and disaster recovery plans
Ensure backup systems are segregated from production networks
Security testing and evaluation (Article 32(1)(d)):
Conduct vulnerability scans monthly and after significant changes
Perform penetration testing annually or after major deployments
Execute tabletop exercises for incident response procedures
Review and update security measures based on test findings
Secure development and change management:
Integrate security reviews into CI/CD pipelines
Conduct code reviews with security focus for applications processing personal data
Maintain change logs and rollback procedures
Test security controls in staging before production deployment
Monitoring and detection:
Implement security information and event management (SIEM) for centralized logging
Configure alerts for suspicious access patterns and data exfiltration attempts
Monitor for configuration drift from security baselines
Establish 24/7 security operations or managed detection and response
Vulnerability and patch management:
Maintain asset inventory of all systems processing personal data
Apply critical security patches within 30 days of release
Prioritize patching based on exploitability and data sensitivity
Track patch compliance with automated scanning
Supplier and processor management (Article 28):
Execute data processing agreements with all processors
Assess processor security controls before engagement
Monitor processor compliance through audits or certifications
Maintain approved sub-processor lists with notification procedures
Technical security measures required by GDPR
Technical security measures are the specific technologies and processes you use to protect personal data from unauthorized access, alteration, or destruction. These hands-on controls form the bedrock of any GDPR-compliant security program.
GDPR explicitly suggests encryption as a key technical control. This includes encrypting data both at rest when stored on servers or databases and in transit as it moves across networks. Pseudonymization is another recommended technique that replaces personal identifiers with artificial ones to reduce the linkability of a dataset to an individual's identity.
You must implement strong access controls to ensure confidentiality. This involves using Identity and Access Management and Role-Based Access Controls to enforce the principle of least privilege. Users and systems should only have access to the data necessary for their functions.
A continuous process of identifying, evaluating, and mitigating security weaknesses is essential. This includes regular vulnerability scanning and timely application of security patches to operating systems, applications, and infrastructure. You need to close security holes that attackers could exploit.
Protecting your network is fundamental to preventing unauthorized access. Network segmentation isolates sensitive systems while firewalls control traffic. Continuous network monitoring helps you detect and respond to suspicious activity in real time.
Organizational security measures for personal data protection
Beyond technology, GDPR requires organizational measures—the policies, procedures, and human-centric processes that create a culture of security. These controls ensure that people, not just systems, are equipped to protect personal data.
A Data Processing Agreement (DPA) is a contract required under Article 28 between a data controller and processor that documents the processor's obligations, processing instructions, security measures, and assistance commitments.
Your employees are a critical line of defense. Regular training programs educate staff on data protection principles, their specific responsibilities under GDPR, and how to recognize and report potential security incidents like phishing attacks. This training should happen when employees join and continue throughout their tenure.
You must have a documented incident response plan to detect, respond to, and recover from security breaches. In the event of a personal data breach, Article 33 mandates notification to the supervisory authority without undue delay and, where feasible, within 72 hours of becoming aware of the breach. When the breach is likely to result in a high risk to the rights and freedoms of individuals, Article 34 requires you to also notify affected data subjects without undue delay, unless you have implemented appropriate technical and organizational protection measures (such as encryption) or taken subsequent measures to ensure the high risk is no longer likely to materialize. Your incident response plan should define clear criteria and workflows for both supervisory authority and data subject notifications.
Breach notification requirements: who to notify and when
GDPR creates distinct notification obligations depending on the breach's risk level. Your incident response plan must address both supervisory authority and data subject notifications.
Supervisory authority notification (Article 33): You must notify your lead supervisory authority of any personal data breach unless the breach is unlikely to result in a risk to individuals' rights and freedoms. Notification must occur without undue delay and, where feasible, within 72 hours of becoming aware of the breach. If notification exceeds 72 hours, you must provide reasons for the delay.
Required notification content:
Description of the nature of the breach, including categories and approximate numbers of data subjects and records affected
Name and contact details of your Data Protection Officer or other contact point
Description of the likely consequences of the breach
Description of measures taken or proposed to address the breach and mitigate its effects
Data subject notification (Article 34): When a breach is likely to result in a high risk to individuals' rights and freedoms, you must also notify affected data subjects without undue delay. High risk typically involves breaches of sensitive data (health, financial, credentials), large-scale breaches, or breaches that could lead to identity theft, fraud, or significant harm.
Exceptions to data subject notification: You don't need to notify data subjects if:
You implemented appropriate technical and organizational protection measures (such as encryption) rendering the data unintelligible to unauthorized persons
You took subsequent measures ensuring the high risk is no longer likely to materialize
Notification would involve disproportionate effort (in which case you must make a public communication or similar measure)
Breach documentation (Article 33(5)): Even when a breach doesn't require notification, you must document all breaches, including the facts, effects, and remedial actions taken. Supervisory authorities may request these records to verify compliance with notification obligations.
Cloud-specific breach considerations: In cloud environments, determine whether the breach originated from your configuration/application (controller responsibility) or the cloud provider's infrastructure (processor responsibility). Processors must notify you of breaches affecting your data so you can meet your notification obligations. Ensure your Article 28 agreements specify notification timeframes and required information.
Clear, comprehensive, and accessible security policies guide employee behavior and ensure consistent application of security controls. These documents should cover areas like data handling, access control, and acceptable use. They form the governance backbone of your security program.
Appointing a Data Protection Officer is mandatory under Article 37 for public authorities, organizations whose core activities involve large-scale systematic monitoring of individuals (such as behavioral advertising platforms), or organizations whose core activities involve large-scale processing of special category data (health records, biometric data) or criminal conviction data. Even when not required, designating a DPO strengthens your compliance posture and provides a clear point of contact for supervisory authorities and data subjects.
Cloud Security Controls: Framework, Checklist, and Best Practices for Implementation
Learn to navigate the complexities of cloud security, including the knowledge and tools required to build a robust and proactive defense against ever-evolving cyber threats.
Leia mais
Cloud-specific considerations for GDPR security controls
Applying GDPR security controls in the cloud introduces unique challenges due to the dynamic and distributed nature of cloud environments. Security is no longer confined to a physical data center, requiring a shift in how you implement and manage controls.
When using cloud services, security becomes a shared responsibility between the cloud service provider and you as the customer. The provider is responsible for the security of the cloud, including physical infrastructure. You're responsible for security in the cloud, including data, configurations, and access controls.
Many organizations use multiple cloud providers, which can lead to inconsistent security postures and compliance gaps. You need a unified approach to apply consistent security controls and policies across all cloud environments regardless of the provider. Agentless discovery across AWS, Azure, GCP, and Kubernetes builds a single inventory of data stores, identities, and configurations without deployment overhead. This unified visibility enables consistent policy enforcement, faster DPIA evidence collection, and complete Article 30 records of processing activities across your entire cloud footprint. This includes establishing data processing agreements under Article 28 with each cloud service provider acting as a processor, documenting processing instructions, ensuring confidentiality commitments, managing sub-processor approvals, and defining assistance obligations for data subject rights requests and breach notifications. Standardize transfer mechanisms such as Standard Contractual Clauses for any cross-border data flows between cloud regions.
Standard Contractual Clauses (SCCs) are standardized contract terms approved by the European Commission under Article 46(2)(c) that provide appropriate safeguards for international data transfers to countries without adequacy decisions.
Traditional security tools are often ineffective in the cloud. You should leverage cloud-native security tools designed for these environments:
Cloud Security Posture Management: Detects misconfigurations across your cloud infrastructure
Cloud Workload Protection Platforms: Secures virtual machines, containers, and serverless functions using agent-based monitoring for runtime protection and agentless scanning for discovery and configuration assessment, depending on workload type and risk profile.
Cloud Infrastructure Entitlement Management: Manages permissions and prevents excessive access
Mapping cloud-native security tools to Article 32 requirements:
| Article 32 Requirement | Cloud-Native Tool Category | Specific Capabilities | Example Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Encryption and pseudonymization (32(1)(a)) | Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) | Discovers unencrypted data stores, enforces encryption policies, manages key usage | Identifies S3 buckets containing personal data without server-side encryption enabled |
| Access control and least privilege | Cloud Infrastructure Entitlement Management (CIEM) | Analyzes effective permissions, identifies excessive access, recommends right-sizing | Detects developer accounts with production database admin rights when only read access is needed |
| Configuration security | Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) | Detects misconfigurations, enforces compliance policies, monitors drift | Alerts when security groups allow unrestricted inbound access to databases containing personal data |
| Workload protection | Cloud Workload Protection Platform (CWPP) | Runtime threat detection, vulnerability management, file integrity monitoring | Detects unauthorized process attempting to access customer data files on a virtual machine |
| Monitoring and logging (32(1)(d)) | Cloud-native SIEM and log management | Centralized logging, correlation, alerting, long-term retention | Aggregates access logs from multiple cloud accounts to detect suspicious data access patterns |
| Testing and evaluation (32(1)(d)) | Continuous security scanning and penetration testing | Automated vulnerability scanning, attack path analysis, security testing in CI/CD | Identifies exploitable vulnerability chains leading to personal data exposure before production deployment |
| Restoration capability (32(1)(c)) | Cloud backup and disaster recovery services | Automated backups, point-in-time recovery, cross-region replication | Restores customer database to state before ransomware encryption within defined RTO |
| Incident detection and response | Cloud Detection and Response (CDR) | Real-time threat detection, investigation timelines, automated response | Detects and blocks data exfiltration attempt from compromised application to external endpoint |
See Wiz in Action
See how modern platforms correlate control-plane events with runtime telemetry to catch espionage campaigns early. Schedule a demo to explore detection capabilities.
Get a demo
GDPR Chapter V restricts transferring personal data outside the European Economic Area unless appropriate safeguards are in place. You must ensure international transfers comply with mechanisms such as adequacy decisions (Article 45), Standard Contractual Clauses (Article 46), or Binding Corporate Rules. In cloud environments, this means understanding where data is stored and processed across regions, implementing contractual safeguards with cloud providers, and conducting Transfer Impact Assessments when transferring to jurisdictions without adequacy decisions. This often means selecting specific regions when provisioning cloud resources.
Risk-based approach to implementing GDPR security controls
GDPR does not provide a one-size-fits-all list of security controls. Instead, it mandates a risk-based approach where you tailor security measures based on the specific risks associated with your data processing activities.
An adequacy decision is a determination by the European Commission under Article 45 that a third country, territory, or international organization ensures an adequate level of data protection, allowing personal data transfers without additional safeguards.
The first step is conducting a risk assessment, often through a Data Protection Impact Assessment, to identify potential threats to personal data. You evaluate both the likelihood of a risk occurring and the severity of its potential impact on individuals' rights and freedoms. This assessment guides which controls you prioritize.
The chosen security measures must be appropriate for the nature, scope, context, and purpose of the data processing. Processing special category data under Article 9 (health data, biometric data, genetic data) requires far more stringent controls than processing non-sensitive marketing contact information. Article 32 requires you to match the protection level to the sensitivity of the information, the potential impact on data subjects' rights and freedoms, and the likelihood of risks materializing.
GDPR requires you to take into account the "state of the art" in security technology as well as the costs of implementation. This doesn't mean you must use the most expensive or experimental technology. Your controls should be modern and effective relative to the risk you're addressing.
The threat landscape and business operations constantly change. Risk assessment cannot be a one-time activity but must be a continuous process. Graph-based context across misconfigurations, identities, vulnerabilities, and data exposure surfaces toxic combinations that materially affect data subjects—directly supporting Article 32's 'appropriate to risk' mandate. Instead of triaging thousands of isolated findings, prioritize the attack paths that could actually compromise personal data confidentiality, integrity, or availability. This context-driven approach aligns security efforts with GDPR's risk-based philosophy.
Risk Based Vulnerability Management: How to Prioritize the Threats That Actually Matter
Leia mais
Demonstrating compliance and maintaining security documentation
Under GDPR's accountability principle (Article 5(2)), it's not enough to be compliant—you must be able to demonstrate it. Comprehensive and up-to-date documentation is crucial for proving that you've implemented appropriate security controls. Automated posture snapshots, control test results, and issue remediation timelines reduce audit preparation time and provide continuous evidence of compliance. Instead of manually compiling documentation when auditors arrive, maintain a current compliance posture with automated evidence collection mapped to Article 32 requirements and industry frameworks.
Binding Corporate Rules (BCRs) are internal data protection policies approved by supervisory authorities under Article 47 that allow multinational organizations to transfer personal data between group entities in different countries.
You must document the technical and organizational measures you have in place. This includes security policies, procedures, network diagrams, and configurations that show how personal data is protected. These documents serve as evidence during audits or investigations.
Maintaining detailed logs and audit trails of access to and processing of personal data is essential for accountability under Article 5(2). These records help you investigate security incidents and demonstrate that access controls are being enforced correctly. Define retention periods based on your lawful basis for logging (typically legitimate interest for security), the risk level of the processing, and legal obligations such as breach investigation requirements. Ensure logging practices respect storage limitation (Article 5(1)(e)) and data minimization (Article 5(1)(c)) by retaining only necessary log data and pseudonymizing or aggregating logs where feasible.
While not mandatory, obtaining a GDPR certification or adhering to an approved code of conduct can be a valuable way to demonstrate compliance. Third-party assessments and audits provide independent validation of your security posture. They also give stakeholders confidence in your data protection practices.
Article 32(1)(d) requires you to regularly test, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of your security measures through activities such as vulnerability scans, penetration tests, and tabletop exercises. Additionally, Article 32(1)(c) mandates the ability to restore the availability and access to personal data in a timely manner following an incident. This means implementing backup systems, disaster recovery procedures, and business continuity plans, then testing restoration processes to ensure recovery time objectives align with the criticality of the data and processing activities.
Common implementation challenges and best practices
Implementing and maintaining GDPR security controls can be challenging, especially in complex, modern IT environments. You'll likely face hurdles that can undermine your compliance efforts if not addressed proactively.
Key implementation challenges:
Alert fatigue and noise: Traditional security tools often generate a high volume of alerts, many of which are low-risk or false positives. Without contextual prioritization, security teams become overwhelmed and may miss critical threats.
Tool fragmentation and visibility gaps: Many organizations have a sprawling collection of siloed security tools that don't integrate well. This fragmentation creates visibility gaps and operational inefficiencies. You must manually correlate data from different sources to understand the full picture of a risk, which wastes time and resources.
Dynamic cloud environments: Cloud environments are highly dynamic with resources being created and destroyed continuously. Your security controls must be able to scale automatically with the environment to ensure consistent protection without manual intervention. Static security approaches simply don't work in these settings.
Continuous compliance requirements: GDPR compliance is an ongoing journey, not a destination. You should adopt a mindset of continuous improvement by regularly reviewing your security posture, learning from incidents, and refining your controls to adapt to new threats.
Best practices for overcoming challenges:
Foster collaboration between security, development, and operations teams. When everyone works from the same contextual data and speaks a shared security language, you can operationalize your security strategy more effectively. This breaks down silos and ensures consistent application of controls across your organization.
How Wiz supports comprehensive GDPR security control implementation
Wiz provides a unified platform to implement and maintain GDPR security controls across your cloud environment. The platform includes GDPR as a built-in compliance framework, enabling continuous assessment against Article 32's technical and organizational requirements.
Through Data Security Posture Management (DSPM), Wiz DSPM continuously discovers and classifies sensitive data like PII across multi-cloud environments, supporting data minimization principles without manual scanning efforts. The Wiz Security Graph maps attack paths to sensitive data and prioritizes risks using contextual relationships between vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, identities, and data exposure—aligning with GDPR's risk-based philosophy under Article 32.
Cloud Infrastructure Entitlement Management (CIEM) identifies excessive permissions and toxic identity combinations that could compromise personal data confidentiality, while Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) continuously monitors configurations and detects misconfigurations that could expose personal data stores.
The platform includes over 100 built-in compliance frameworks to automatically assess your cloud environment against Article 32 requirements, simplifying evidence collection for audits and DPIAs. Wiz embeds security-by-design principles into development workflows, provides real-time threat detection and incident response to maintain confidentiality, integrity, and availability of personal data processing systems, and offers continuous monitoring with audit trails and detailed logs that demonstrate compliance with Article 32's testing and evaluation requirements.
Get a personalized demo to see how Wiz can help you implement and maintain comprehensive GDPR security controls across your cloud environment.
Explore GDPR compliance for your specific environment
Schedule a personalized demo to see how Wiz addresses your specific Article 32 requirements.
