Lately, Model Context Protocol, or MCP, has become a preferred framework for integrating enterprise databases, APIs, and other critical infrastructure with AI systems. An open-source project from Anthropic, MCP is meant for enforcing security best practices, adding policy-based decision-making to any action or tool.
But few organizations have considered the security implications that come as a result of such a widespread adoption of MCP. MCP is creating direct pathways between AI models and enterprise resources, which effectively eliminates traditional security boundaries that rely on system isolation. So, when attackers compromise a single MCP server (one that hasn’t yet been properly hardened), they gain access to multiple enterprise systems at once.
That’s bad news: Most MCP implementations require elevated privileges to function effectively, and these systems routinely handle sensitive operations like customer database queries and infrastructure commands.
In this post, we'll examine why traditional security frameworks struggle with modern AI integration challenges and explore how MCP fills critical gaps in enterprise security architecture. We’ll also explore the technical mechanics that make or break these implementations. By the end, you’ll be equipped with proven practices that eliminate attack vectors while preserving operational power.
Are You Ready for Secure AI?
Learn what leading teams are doing today to reduce AI threats tomorrow.
The advantages of MCP
Consider how security tools typically operate today. On one end, identity systems manage who can access what, while data classification tools track sensitive information, and activity monitoring solutions log what happened after the fact.
The trouble is, these systems don't talk to each other in meaningful ways. Here’s what happens when only traditional controls are in place: When an AI agent requests access to customer data through MCP, your identity system might approve the request based on role permissions, but it has no idea that the same agent just attempted three suspicious operations in the past hour.
This fragmentation becomes particularly dangerous when you realize that high-risk actions often happen without real-time policy checks. An AI system can exfiltrate sensitive data or execute destructive commands, and your security stack might not piece together the threat until it's too late.
To address these threats, MCP introduces a lightweight decision gate that makes security less reactive and more proactive. Instead of relying on post-incident forensics, organizations can implement real-time policy enforcement that evaluates every request based on identity, environment context, and the specific action being attempted.
Core components of the MCP ecosystem
MCP operates through three primary components working together to create a unified security enforcement layer.
MCP client
The client is the very first line of defense as it intercepts high-risk actions before they reach key systems. Instead of passing requests along blindly, it evaluates each action against predefined criteria and forwards only legitimate requests to the policy engine.
What makes MCP clients particularly effective is the fact that they are able to operate across diverse environments. It’s reasonable for you to expect them to monitor terminal sessions where engineers run infrastructure commands, intercept API calls in CI/CD pipelines, and even gate AI security tools that interact with sensitive datasets.
MCP server
The server functions as the central policy engine that makes real-time decisions about whether specific actions should be allowed or blocked. When a client intercepts a potentially risky operation, the server evaluates that request based on multiple factors, including user identity, environmental context, the specific action being attempted, and any relevant organizational policies.
Policy-as-code framework
Policies in MCP are written as code using formats like JSON or HCLL (similar to how infrastructure teams manage Terraform configurations). Using this approach, security teams can version control their policies, test changes in staging environments, and deploy updates through the same CI/CD pipelines they use for application code.
The policy framework supports granular rules that can account for complex organizational requirements: for example, a policy might allow database access during business hours but require manager approval for the same operation during weekends.
Centralized audit trail
Every interaction that flows through the MCP ecosystem gets logged extensively. These logs capture what happened and the finer context surrounding each decision, including which policies were evaluated and whether any exceptions were granted.
Get an AI-SPM Sample Assessment
Take a peek behind the curtain to see what insights you’ll gain from Wiz AI Security Posture Management (AI-SPM) capabilities.
Security use cases enabled by MCP
Organizations are discovering that MCP's policy enforcement capabilities extend far beyond traditional access controls, particularly as AI security risks continue to evolve.
Terminal security becomes significantly more robust when MCP intercepts destructive commands before they execute.
Cloud access control gets a major upgrade through MCP's ability to apply granular policies to API-level actions across AWS, Azure, and GCP.
CI/CD pipeline guardrails represent another powerful application of MCP. By enforcing policies during builds and deployments, the system can block dangerous Terraform commands, prevent unauthorized container deployments, and require additional approval for changes that affect production environments.
AI system safeguards leverage MCP to gate prompt injections, control tool usage, and monitor memory access in LLM agents. These safeguards prove essential when deploying AI security tools that need sensitive data access under strict operational controls.
Securing MCP
Unlike conventional applications with defined boundaries, MCP builds pretty dynamic pathways between AI systems and enterprise resources. So, a single compromised MCP server doesn't just breach one system but potentially your whole IT infrastructure. The risk with MCP only increases since its components rely on elevated privileges for database access, infrastructure commands, and sensitive operations. One compromise can inherit those privileges across multitudes of enterprise systems.
These attack vectors require new security practices:
Authentication
While OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect lay the foundations for identity verification, MCP authentication policies themselves become high-value targets since they're written as code. This means they require version control, audit trails, and signature verification to prevent tampering. A compromised policy could grant attackers sweeping access across enterprise systems, so policy integrity becomes a critical concern that many organizations initially overlook.
Transport security
Transport security is as crucial as authentication and demands mutual TLS (mTLS) communications. While this bidirectional verification ensures that compromised clients can't masquerade as legitimate services, it also raises availability questions that organizations must address up front. Best practices dictate that when MCP servers become unavailable, systems need predetermined fail-safe behaviors. You’ll want to "fail closed" rather than "fail open." (Accepting temporary operational disruption is a small compromise compared to potential security breaches!)
Supply chain security
Given MCP's decentralized nature, supply chain security can be especially complex. Without a central authority enforcing security standards, organizations encounter varying code quality and inconsistent patching across implementations. The solution? Internal trust registries that treat unvetted MCP servers like unknown software from the internet.
Leveraging Wiz to secure MCP
Wiz addresses many MCP security challenges we’ve discussed above through a comprehensive approach that includes both securing MCP implementations and leveraging MCP architecture for its own security enforcement.
It starts with trust registries that validate server integrity before deployment, blocking unvetted components across 40+ operating systems and 120,000+ vulnerabilities. This foundation enables automated scanning that integrates into CI/CD pipelines, surfacing contextual risks continuously rather than periodically.
Building on this visibility, the Security Graph evaluates access requests dynamically, weighing user identity against potential blast radius through interconnected analysis. When it comes to AI workloads specifically, Wiz's MCP Server (more on this next!) enables natural language queries while maintaining security boundaries and detecting sensitive data leakage risks automatically. All of this intelligence flows into unified monitoring that consolidates events through API integrations, revealing how vulnerabilities interconnect and create toxic combinations that turn individual issues into severe threats.
How Wiz uses MCP for real-time security enforcement
Wiz’s own MCP Server enables customers to enforce security guardrails across cloud-native environments, providing real-time policy enforcement that addresses critical AI security risks in modern cloud infrastructures. The server integrates with development workflows, enabling capabilities like automated GitHub pull request creation for security remediation. The server functions as a unified security data source through a central host and server setup, creating a single, contextual view of your security posture that simplifies investigations and speeds up incident response.
The server leverages Wiz’s proprietary Security Graph to enrich policy decisions with real-time context that goes far beyond traditional access controls. When engineers attempt operations like destructive Terraform commands, the system evaluates asset ownership, exposure levels, identity risks, and potential blast radius before making enforcement decisions.
Beyond simple blocking, this enforcement creates an intelligent feedback system. You’ll find that MCP events feed directly into Wiz Defend, where they power incident detection and threat hunting. This integration continuously refines AI-SPM while letting teams query their cloud environment in natural language. The result transforms raw security data into actionable insights that strengthen your overall security posture.
To learn more, check out this blog post from Wiz. Better yet, schedule a demo, and see for yourself how Wiz protects everything you build and run in the cloud.
AI Security Posture Assessment Sample Report
Take a peek behind the curtain to see what insights you’ll gain from Wiz AI Security Posture Management (AI-SPM) capabilities. In this Sample Assessment Report, you’ll get a view inside Wiz AI-SPM including the types of AI risks AI-SPM detects.