AI SAST: Smarter Static Application Security Testing

Wiz Expertenteam
Key takeaways about AI SAST:
  • AI SAST enhances traditional static analysis with AI-driven triage, clear explanations, and smarter grouping so teams spend less time sorting through noise.

  • AI SAST becomes most valuable when paired with real environment context—connecting code issues to cloud resources, identities, data stores, and runtime exposure to show what is actually exploitable.

  • The best AI SAST solutions don’t just scan code; they help teams fix risks through AI-generated remediation guidance, ownership mapping, and developer-friendly guardrails in PRs and CI.

  • Wiz takes this approach further with native SAST and a dedicated SAST AI Agent that enriches SAST and SCA findings with code-to-cloud context, deduplicates and groups issues, and surfaces the highest-impact fixes first.

Understanding AI SAST in modern application security

AI SAST is static application security testing enhanced with artificial intelligence to make code scanning more accurate, contextual, and actionable. You still perform static analysis on source or compiled code, but AI helps teams understand which findings matter and how to fix them.

Traditional SAST examines code without running it – unlike DAST, which analyzes a live application – and identifies vulnerabilities such as SQL injection, command injection, insecure deserialization, and unsafe input handling. While essential, these scanners often overwhelm teams with noisy findings, inconsistent rule quality, and limited context about what is actually exploitable.

AI SAST addresses these limits by adding an intelligent reasoning layer on top of the scanner. Instead of treating every flagged pattern as equal, AI can interpret the code, group related issues, and summarize the real risk in clear, developer-friendly language.

Think of the difference this way:

  • Traditional SAST: A rules engine that flags every pattern it’s configured to detect.

  • AI SAST: A smart reviewer that interprets the results, understands how your application works, and highlights what needs attention first.

This matters even more as teams build microservices, adopt multiple languages, and increasingly rely on AI-generated code – which studies show often introduces security flaws. AI SAST helps teams navigate this complexity by reducing noise and surfacing the issues most likely to create real exposure in production.

But AI alone isn’t enough. AI SAST becomes most powerful when paired with environment context – linking code findings to the cloud services, identities, and data they impact. This shift turns static analysis from a list of patterns into a view of actual attack paths and risks that matter.

Get the Application Security Best Practices [Cheat Sheet]

This 6-page guide goes beyond basics — it’s a deep dive into advanced, practical AppSec strategies for developers, security engineers, and DevOps teams.

How AI transforms static application security testing

The SAST scanner still performs the foundational work: parsing code, tracing data flows, and applying security rules. AI then builds on this raw output to deliver cleaner, more contextual, and more actionable results. This shift turns static analysis from a noisy signal into a risk-focused workflow developers can trust.

Smarter detection through code understanding

AI models excel at interpreting patterns and meaning in text, and source code is no exception. When applied to static analysis, AI can:

  • Recognize custom or framework-specific patterns that rigid rules often miss.

  • Follow complex, multi-service data flows, even when they cross language or repository boundaries.

  • Reason across mixed stacks – modern applications that combine multiple languages, frameworks, and autogenerated code.

This enables richer detection while reducing brittle rules and false alarms that plague traditional scanners.

Automated triage and meaningful noise reduction

For most teams, the bottleneck in SAST isn’t finding issues – it’s triaging them.
AI dramatically improves this step by:

  • Grouping hundreds of similar alerts into a handful of root-cause issues.

  • Eliminating duplicates created by overlapping rules or repeated patterns across services.

  • Flagging likely false positives based on deeper code understanding and surrounding context.

Instead of a wall of alerts, teams get a smaller, higher-confidence set of issues they can fix quickly. This AI-assisted triage is the foundation of the Wiz SAST AI Agent, which transforms raw SAST output into a clear, deduplicated, prioritized issue list.

Better prioritization through real environment context

Example of SAST AI Agent for triaging and explaining findings in code.

A code issue isn’t inherently “high severity” until you know how and where it runs. AI SAST becomes significantly more powerful when it incorporates:

  • Cloud infrastructure context

  • Identity and permission data

  • Runtime signals and exposure

  • Dependency and supply chain information

With this context, you move from “this pattern is dangerous” to “this issue creates an exploitable attack path in production.”

This is the core of Wiz’s approach: connecting code-level findings to the cloud resources, identities, and data stores they affect so teams can fix risks, not just fix findings.

Clear explanations and actionable fixes

Example of conversational experience in a GitHub PR with a SAST AI agent.

Finding an issue is only half the work – developers need to understand what to do next.

AI helps by generating:

  • Concise, plain-language summaries of what’s wrong

  • Data flow explanations or diagrams showing how untrusted input moves

  • Code-level remediation suggestions aligned with the project’s libraries and idioms

These suggestions always require human validation, but they give developers a strong head start and reduce back-and-forth with security teams. Delivered directly in the IDE, pull request, or CI output, this makes security feel integrated – not bolted on.

Catch code risks before you deploy

Learn how Wiz Code scans IaC, containers, and pipelines to stop misconfigurations and vulnerabilities before they hit your cloud.

Informationen darüber, wie Wiz mit Ihren personenbezogenen Daten umgeht, finden Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung.

How to evaluate AI SAST solutions

Choosing an AI SAST solution means looking beyond flashy AI claims and assessing whether the platform can reliably reduce noise, surface real risk, and accelerate fixes. The strongest platforms demonstrate measurable improvements across detection quality, triage efficiency, developer experience, and contextual risk understanding.

Evaluate solutions across these dimensions:

Detection accuracy and coverage

A strong AI SAST platform maintains the rigor of a traditional static analysis engine while improving precision.

Evaluate:

  • Precision and recall against known vulnerable test suites (e.g., OWASP Benchmark, Juliet)

  • Coverage across your stack – Java, JavaScript/TypeScript, Python, Go, C#, IaC templates, etc.

  • Handling of framework-specific patterns that rigid rule sets miss

  • Support for polyglot and microservice architectures

AI should improve detection quality, not disguise weak scanning.

Noise reduction and triage efficiency

Example of AI-assisted remediation guidance.

AI SAST should dramatically reduce the work required to get to an actionable issue list.

Measure:

  • False positive reduction (30–50% is a strong benchmark)

  • Time-to-triage (MTTT) from scan completion to a clean, grouped, prioritized list (<5 minutes is ideal)

  • Reduction in duplicate or redundant findings across microservices

  • Meaningfulness of grouping – multiple alerts collapsed into root-cause issues

This is core to Wiz’s SAST AI Agent, which turns thousands of raw findings into a structured, deduplicated, context-driven set of issues.

Risk-based prioritization with real environment context

A modern AI SAST tool should not prioritize solely based on patterns. It should understand where the code runs and what it can impact.

Evaluate whether the platform can:

  • Connect SAST + SCA + IaC data

  • Map findings to the cloud resources and identities that execute them

  • Identify exploitable attack paths, not theoretical patterns

  • Incorporate runtime signals and data exposure levels

This is the primary differentiator of Wiz’s approach: code findings enriched with cloud context to highlight what is actually exploitable in production.

Developer experience and fix acceleration

AI SAST must fit seamlessly into developer workflows – and actually help developers fix issues faster.

Look for:

  • Clear explanations and data flow visualizations

  • High-quality code suggestions that match the project’s style

  • IDE guardrails that catch risky patterns before commit

  • CI/PR integrations that surface guidance in the tools developers already use

  • Fix acceptance rate, ideally >60% for AI-generated suggestions

The more the tool reduces friction, the more likely issues are to be fixed quickly.

Ownership mapping and automation

AI should help eliminate manual routing work by identifying who owns a particular issue.

Evaluate:

  • Automatic mapping to repos, services, and teams

  • Integration with CODEOWNERS, service catalogs, or monorepo metadata

  • Contextual fields (e.g., cloud account, runtime environment) to help owners understand impact

  • Support for SLA policies based on exposure levels

This is essential for reducing MTTR and enabling at-scale remediation.

Wiz’s approach to SAST

Wiz takes a different approach to static analysis: instead of treating SAST findings in isolation, Wiz connects them to real cloud context so teams fix the issues that are actually exploitable – not just the ones that trigger patterns.

Native SAST + SAST AI Agent, powered by the Wiz Security Graph

Wiz now includes a native SAST scanner and a dedicated SAST AI Agent that work together to improve accuracy, reduce noise, and accelerate remediation.
The scanner provides deep, language-aware static analysis, while the SAST AI Agent:

  • Triages and groups findings into clear root-cause issues

  • Eliminates duplicates across services, languages, or scanners

  • Explains risk in plain language

  • Suggests both code-level and cloud-level fixes based on actual environment exposure

  • Maps issues to owners using repo metadata, CODEOWNERS, and service catalogs

All of this is enriched with the Wiz Security Graph, which correlates SAST, SCA, IaC, cloud configuration, identity permissions, and runtime signals into one unified context model.

Our goal was simple: to give developers the right tools, not more tickets. With the Wiz Code ASPM platform and the SAST engine, developers now get actionable guidance, including the vulnerable code snippet, full runtime context, and AI remediation options. Ultimately, this integrated workflow drives faster, better remediation across our continuous, horizontal security model.

Simon Goldsmith, CISO at OVO

Bring your own scanner – or use Wiz SAST

Wiz is designed for flexibility. Teams can:

  • Use Wiz’s native SAST scanner for first-class detection and AI-driven triage

  • Ingest results from existing SAST and SCA tools, preserving current workflows while reducing noise

Regardless of the source, Wiz:

  • De-duplicates and groups findings

  • Connects them to the cloud resources and identities that execute the code

  • Surfaces only issues that create real attack paths or business impact

This turns SAST into a risk-focused workflow rather than a pattern-matching exercise.

Try a targeted workflow demo to explore how Wiz SAST and the SAST AI Agent prioritize issues based on real attack paths and deliver developer-friendly fixes. Request a demo.

Catch code risks before you deploy

Learn how Wiz Code scans IaC, containers, and pipelines to stop misconfigurations and vulnerabilities before they hit your cloud.

Informationen darüber, wie Wiz mit Ihren personenbezogenen Daten umgeht, finden Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung.