Static code analysis is the process of analyzing the source code of an application to find security and code issues without ever executing it. This automated process lets developers identify security issues before anything’s deployed to production environments (where it can do major damage), and it also improves code quality by enforcing standard coding practices.
Secure Coding Best Practices [Cheat Sheet]
In this 11 page cheat sheet we'll cover 10+ essential security topics, offering practical steps for areas like API security, input validation, and containerized application protection—ideal for both beginner and advanced users.
Download PDF
Static code analysis is an integral part of secure software development practices—especially for the DevSecOps approach, where security is integrated throughout the development lifecycle. Manual code reviews—though useful and very necessary!—have two major limitations: They’re time-consuming, and they’re prone to human error. On the other hand, static code analysis uses automated detection tools for standard vulnerabilities and coding rules.
Here are the most crucial facts about static code analysis you need to know:
Static code analysis tools are developed to work with different programming languages and environments. Traditional applications developed through programming languages such as Java, Python, or C++ require static analysis tools tailored to their syntax and semantics.
Cloud-native applications built around microservices architectures and containers introduce complexities that require specialized tools to analyze aspects such as infrastructure as code (IaC) and configuration files alongside traditional source code.
Static code analysis is a key component in software bill of materials (SBOM) generation, ensuring transparency in open-source dependencies and reducing security risks.
Static code analysis also plays a major role in static application security testing (SAST) by detecting vulnerabilities in the source code before deployment.
Catch code risks before you deploy
Learn how Wiz Code scans IaC, containers, and pipelines to stop misconfigurations and vulnerabilities before they hit your cloud.
Comparing static and dynamic code analysis
Static code analysis and dynamic code analysis are two complementary approaches to identifying issues in code. Static code analysis evaluates the code without executing it, while dynamic code analysis (DAST) involves running the application to uncover runtime issues. Let’s take a closer look at how the two technologies compare to each other:
| Feature | Static Code Analysis | Dynamic Code Analysis |
|---|---|---|
| Execution required? | No | Yes |
| Detects security vulnerabilities? | Yes | Yes |
| Identifies runtime issues? | No | Yes |
| Integrates with CI/CD? | Yes | Sometimes |
| Performance overhead | Minimal | High |
The bottom line? While static code analysis effectively detects syntax errors, insecure coding patterns (such as SQL injection vulnerabilities), and hardcoded secrets, it has limitations. It cannot identify runtime-specific vulnerabilities, such as authentication bypasses, logic errors, or performance bottlenecks that only manifest during execution. Combining static analysis with dynamic testing helps bridge this gap.
In a best-case scenario, static and dynamic analysis should be used together. Static analysis can detect vulnerabilities early in the SDLC, while dynamic analysis can identify any runtime issues and unforeseen errors. By incorporating both methods into a continuous security plan, your development teams can significantly lower risks and increase software reliability.
The process of static code analysis
Static code analysis follows a structured process. Let’s take a step-by-step look:
Parsing the codebase: During this process, the tool transforms the written source code into an abstract syntax tree (AST), which represents the structure of the code. Each part goes through rigorous assessment as a result of this structured method, producing accurate analysis along with exact code error detection.
Analyzing code structure: The tool analyzes and evaluates the abstract syntax tree for syntax correctness, logic flows, and adherence to best practices. It performs checks for deviation from established coding, complex code blocks, and improper indentation to ensure code maintainability and readability.
Identifying patterns and anomalies: The tool finds security vulnerabilities, inefficiencies, and style violations by flagging irregularities in data flow, improper use of variables, and unsafe coding patterns. The issues it looks for include race conditions, insecure API usage, and potential injection attacks.
Generating reports: Developers receive detailed reports with actionable insights, highlighting potential risks and providing recommendations for remediation. To take out the guesswork, reports help teams prioritize fixes based on severity.
Common coding issues detected by static analysis tools
Static analysis tools can pinpoint a wide range of issues, including:
SQL injection risks: Static analysis solutions look for insecure database query problems that attackers may exploit to modify data. The system identifies unsafe user input concatenation, helping you prevent vulnerabilities from becoming exploitable before deployment.
Hardcoded secrets: By flagging API keys, credentials, and passwords stored directly in source code, static analysis tools protect sensitive information from accidental exposure. Remember: Hardcoded secrets can lead to unauthorized access if exposed in public repositories or logs.
Undefined behavior: Logical inconsistencies and syntax errors can lead to unpredictable application behavior. Static analysis tools ensure that software remains reliable under diverse conditions by detecting undefined states.
Memory leaks (in languages like C/C++): Static analysis tools identify improper memory allocation and deallocation practices, reducing resource exhaustion risks. Detecting leaks early helps prevent application crashes and degraded performance over time.
Compliance violations: Static analysis tools help enforce secure coding practices aligned with industry standards like OWASP Top 10 (which outlines common application security risks) and regulatory requirements such as PCI DSS and ISO 27001, which mandate secure software development practices.
AI/ML model analysis: Static analysis tools are evolving to support AI/ML applications by detecting security flaws in AI model implementations, such as hardcoded credentials in model pipelines, improper input sanitization, and insecure API exposure. However, AI security also requires other testing methods to detect adversarial attacks, data poisoning, and model inference threats, which static analysis alone cannot identify.
Infrastructure as code (IaC) security helps identify misconfigurations in the cloud in Terraform, Kubernetes, and AWS CloudFormation templates, such as overly permissive IAM roles, insecure network policies, and unencrypted storage. Unlike traditional static analysis, IaC security scanning prioritizes misconfiguration detection to prevent cloud security breaches.
State of Code Security
SAST helps detect vulnerabilities in code, but secrets detection and repository security remain major blind spots. The State of Code Security Report 2025 found that 80% of GitHub workflows have insecure default permissions.
Download report
Tools and techniques used in static code analysis
There are tons of tools out there for various programming languages, like Java, Python, and JavaScript. They work across different environments, such as IDEs and CI/CD pipelines, to help catch bugs and improve code quality before they become issues.
Top static code analysis solutions
SonarQube supports many programming languages and conducts rule-based code evaluation.
ESLint is a popular tool that performs JavaScript and TypeScript linting operations.
Pylint enforces Python code standards and detects errors.
Checkmarx is a specialized tool used in security-focused static analysis.
When choosing a static analysis tool, organizations should weigh the trade-offs between open-source and commercial solutions:
Open-source tools are cost-effective, highly customizable, and community-supported but may lack enterprise-grade features like compliance reporting and advanced rules.
Commercial solutions offer more comprehensive security scanning, vulnerability management, and enterprise integrations, at the cost of licensing fees and potential vendor lock-in.
For security-focused development, a hybrid approach—using open-source tools for code linting and a commercial SAST tool for security assessments—often provides the best balance.
Techniques used in static code analysis
Types of analysis
Rule-based analysis: Detects violations of predefined coding standards
Data flow analysis: Tracks data movement within an application to detect security vulnerabilities
Pattern matching: Identifies known bad practices using regex or predefined rules
Lexical analysis: Analyzes the code structure to enforce proper programming standards and best practices
CI/CD integration
Static analysis presents unique challenges in cloud-native environments, where fast-changing, ephemeral workloads and microservices architectures complicate traditional security assessments. Frequent code updates, distributed components, and dynamically loaded dependencies make it difficult to maintain a strong code security posture.
The solution? Embedding static analysis directly into CI/CD pipelines—but with a critical caveat: scans must be fast and minimally disruptive. Developers expect rapid iteration cycles, and if security scans slow down builds or overwhelm them with false positives, they’ll simply disable or bypass them. To be effective, static analysis in CI/CD should:
Run in seconds, not minutes – Ensuring developers aren’t waiting for security results before merging code.
Fully embedded – Appearing in CI job logs, providing all the necessary details on findings, without requiring context switching.
Support cross-file taint analysis – As modern software development increasingly relies on modular code, microservices, and external dependencies, security scanners must track data flows across multiple files, services, and repositories to detect vulnerabilities that span beyond a single function or file.
Ongoing monitoring is also key. By continuously analyzing code with every commit and merge, static analysis tools can catch vulnerabilities early while maintaining compliance and software quality—without frustrating developers. The best solutions strike a balance: strong security guardrails that don’t slow teams down.
Key features to look for in a static code analysis tool
When selecting a static code analysis tool, consider the following key features:
Usability and integration capabilities: The tool should provide easy integration into your current development workflows and CI/CD pipelines and IDEs.
Real-time analysis and reporting features: Look for a tool that delivers real-time analysis through reporting features. Providing developers with instantaneous feedback helps them address issues as they write code, reducing problems early in the process.
Customizability and scalability: Ask yourself these questions about a potential tool: Can I create custom rules? Can I extend functionality and accommodate project expansion? These features guarantee both short-term effectiveness and the long-term scalability of the system.
Wiz Code
Static analysis is crucial for catching security flaws early, but traditional SAST tools often flood teams with unactionable findings. Wiz Code changes that. Instead of just detecting issues, it ingests findings from third-party SAST tools and enriches them with real-world risk context—exposure, reachability, and exploitability—so teams can prioritize what truly matters.
How Wiz Code makes SAST smarter:
Risk-Based Prioritization – Maps vulnerabilities to cloud resources, runtime configurations, and permissions.
Seamless Integration – Ingests findings from leading SAST tools and delivers enriched insights into IDEs, CI/CD, and security dashboards.
Cloud-Aware Security – Correlates code risks with real-world attack paths for meaningful remediation.
By linking static analysis to cloud posture and runtime context, Wiz Code ensures vulnerabilities aren’t just detected—they’re understood in context and addressed efficiently.
Simply put, Wiz Code makes static code analysis easy. Want to see for yourself? Schedule a demo today.
