
Cloud Vulnerability DB
Eine von der Community geführte Datenbank für Schwachstellen
A SQL injection vulnerability exists in LangGraph's SQLite checkpoint implementation that allows attackers to manipulate SQL queries through metadata filter keys. This affects applications that accept untrusted metadata filter keys (not just filter values) in checkpoint search operations.
Attackers who control metadata filter keys can execute arbitrary sql queries against the database.
The _metadata_predicate() function constructs SQL queries by interpolating filter keys directly into f-strings without validation:
# VULNERABLE CODE (before fix)
for query_key, query_value in metadata_filter.items():
operator, param_value = _where_value(query_value)
predicates.append(
f"json_extract(CAST(metadata AS TEXT), '$.{query_key}') {operator}"
)
param_values.append(param_value)
While filter values are parameterized, filter keys are not validated, allowing SQL injection.
Before Fix:
from langgraph.checkpoint.sqlite import SqliteSaver
saver = SqliteSaver.from_conn_string("checkpoints.db")
# Attacker controls the filter keys
malicious_filter = {"x') OR '1'='1": "dummy"}
# Returns ALL checkpoints, bypassing filtering
results = list(saver.list(None, filter=malicious_filter))
Resulting SQL:
WHERE json_extract(CAST(metadata AS TEXT), '$.x') OR '1'='1') = ?
-- Injected condition makes WHERE clause always true
LangSmith deployment customers are NOT affected by this vulnerability. LangSmith deployments do not allow configuring custom checkpointers, so the vulnerable code path cannot be reached.
You are affected if your application:
get_state_history())@app.post("/api/history") def get_history(request):
filter_field = request.json.get("filter_field") # Untrusted input
filter_value = request.json.get("filter_value")
# VULNERABLE: Attacker can bypass access controls
history = list(graph.get_state_history(
config,
filter={filter_field: filter_value}
))
return history**Note on privilege escalation:** If an endpoint allows end users to specify arbitrary filter keys, those users likely already have legitimate access to query the checkpoint database. In such cases, this vulnerability may not constitute a privilege escalation, as users who can control filter keys would typically already be expected to have database access. However, the SQL injection still allows bypassing intended filtering logic and metadata-based access controls that the application may rely on for data isolation.
### Additional Security Hardening (Defense in Depth)
This release also includes hardening improvements:
**1. Checkpoint Limit Parameter**: used f-string interpolation into parameterized query. Not considered a vulnerability as it requires users to accept untrusted input and not validate it against the actual API signature.
**2. Store Filter Value Parameterization**: Refactored all filter value handling from manual quote escaping to parameterized queries
## Remediation
### Immediate Actions
1. **Update to the patched version** of `langgraph-checkpoint-sqlite`
2. **Audit your code** for locations where filter keys come from untrusted sources
Quelle: NVD
Kostenlose Schwachstellenbewertung
Bewerten Sie Ihre Cloud-Sicherheitspraktiken in 9 Sicherheitsbereichen, um Ihr Risikoniveau zu bewerten und Lücken in Ihren Abwehrmaßnahmen zu identifizieren.
Eine personalisierte Demo anfordern
"Die beste Benutzererfahrung, die ich je gesehen habe, bietet vollständige Transparenz für Cloud-Workloads."
"„Wiz bietet eine zentrale Oberfläche, um zu sehen, was in unseren Cloud-Umgebungen vor sich geht.“ "
"„Wir wissen, dass, wenn Wiz etwas als kritisch identifiziert, es auch tatsächlich ist.“"