
PEACH
Un cadre d’isolation des locataires
CVE-2026-89036 is an argument injection vulnerability in Appwrite, an open-source backend-as-a-service platform, affecting all versions before 2.0.0. Authenticated users holding functions.write or sites.write permissions can inject TAB characters into the providerRootDirectory parameter to execute arbitrary commands via GNU tar argument injection, ultimately achieving remote code execution (RCE) as the builds worker process user. The vulnerability was published on September 17, 2026, and is classified as High severity with a CVSS v3.1 base score of 8.8 and a CVSS v4.0 base score of 8.7 (Feedly, VulnCheck Advisory).
The root cause is CWE-88 (Improper Neutralization of Argument Delimiters in a Command — Argument Injection). Appwrite's builds worker uses escapeshellcmd instead of escapeshellarg to sanitize the providerRootDirectory parameter, and critically fails to quote the parameter when constructing GNU tar command strings. TAB characters survive the escapeshellcmd sanitization and are interpreted by the shell as argument separators, allowing an attacker to inject arbitrary GNU tar flags — most notably --checkpoint-action=exec=<command> — which causes tar to execute attacker-controlled commands during archive processing. Exploitation requires only low-privilege authenticated access (a valid account with functions.write or sites.write permissions) and no user interaction, making it straightforward to trigger over the network (Feedly, VulnCheck Advisory).
Successful exploitation grants an attacker arbitrary command execution as the builds worker process user, resulting in full compromise of confidentiality, integrity, and availability on the affected host. An attacker could exfiltrate sensitive build artifacts, source code, environment variables, and secrets accessible to the worker process, modify or destroy build outputs, or use the compromised worker as a pivot point for lateral movement within the Appwrite infrastructure. The technical impact is rated "total" by NVD's SSVC assessment (Feedly).
As of the time of disclosure, there is no public proof-of-concept exploit and no evidence of in-the-wild exploitation (Feedly). The vulnerability is not listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog, and NVD's SSVC assessment notes exploitation as "none" and automatable as "no." The EPSS score is approximately 0.0127 (1.27%), indicating a low but non-negligible probability of exploitation in the near term. No threat actor attribution has been reported (Feedly).
functions.write or sites.write permissions.providerRootDirectory value containing TAB characters followed by injected GNU tar arguments, for example: legitimate_dir\t--checkpoint=1\t--checkpoint-action=exec=<malicious_command> (where \t represents a literal TAB character).providerRootDirectory value. The Appwrite builds worker will incorporate this unsanitized value into a GNU tar command string.tar, the injected --checkpoint-action=exec argument causes tar to execute the attacker-specified command as the worker process user, achieving RCE (Feedly, VulnCheck Advisory).tar invocations with unexpected arguments such as --checkpoint, --checkpoint-action, or --to-command; error messages or unexpected output from tar commands in build logs.sh, bash, curl, wget, python, nc) that are not part of normal build operations.The primary remediation is to upgrade Appwrite to version 2.0.0 or later, which removes the vulnerable executor build backend code path entirely (the providerRootDirectory parameter handling via the old executor is deleted in favor of the jobs-service orchestrator) (Appwrite Releases, GitHub PR #13028). As interim mitigations, restrict functions.write and sites.write permissions exclusively to trusted administrators, implement network segmentation to limit access to the Appwrite instance, and monitor build worker logs for suspicious tar command executions. There is no known configuration-only workaround that fully eliminates the vulnerability without upgrading.
The vulnerability was disclosed by VulnCheck and assigned via their disclosure program (VulnCheck Advisory). No significant public researcher commentary, vendor statements beyond the patch, or notable media coverage has been identified at this time.
Source: Ce rapport a été généré à l’aide de l’IA
Évaluation gratuite des vulnérabilités
Évaluez vos pratiques de sécurité cloud dans 9 domaines de sécurité pour évaluer votre niveau de risque et identifier les failles dans vos défenses.
Obtenez une démo personnalisée
"La meilleure expérience utilisateur que j’ai jamais vue, offre une visibilité totale sur les workloads cloud."
"Wiz fournit une interface unique pour voir ce qui se passe dans nos environnements cloud."
"Nous savons que si Wiz identifie quelque chose comme critique, c’est qu’il l’est réellement."