CVE-2025-63653
Linux Alpine vulnerability analysis and mitigation

Overview

CVE-2025-63653 is an out-of-bounds read vulnerability in the mk_vhost_fdt_close function (mk_server/mk_vhost.c) of the Monkey HTTP Server, affecting commit f37e984 and all versions up to and including 1.8.5. It allows unauthenticated remote attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending a specially crafted HTTP request. CVE IDs were requested and assigned in October 2025, with public disclosure in January 2026. The vulnerability carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.5 (High) (Feedly, Archer Advisory).

Technical details

The vulnerability is classified as CWE-125 (Out-of-bounds Read) and resides in the virtual host file descriptor table close function (mk_vhost_fdt_close) within mk_server/mk_vhost.c. When processing a crafted HTTP request, the function reads beyond the bounds of an allocated buffer, triggering a crash and resulting in a DoS condition. No authentication or user interaction is required, and the attack can be conducted remotely over the network with low complexity. This CVE is part of a broader set of nine vulnerabilities discovered by researcher archersec in Monkey commit f37e984, all disclosed simultaneously in January 2026 (Archer Advisory, GitHub Issue).

Impact

Successful exploitation causes the Monkey HTTP Server process to crash, resulting in a complete loss of availability for any services hosted on the affected instance. There is no confidentiality or integrity impact — the vulnerability is limited to a DoS condition. Given that Monkey is a lightweight embedded HTTP server often used in IoT and resource-constrained environments, exploitation could disrupt critical services in those contexts (Feedly, Archer Advisory).

Exploitability

Proof-of-concept exploit code is publicly available via the archersec security advisory and the associated GitHub issue, which includes a PoC zip archive (monkey-poc.zip) (GitHub Issue, Archer Advisory). The vulnerability requires no authentication, no user interaction, and has low attack complexity, making it trivially exploitable by any network-accessible attacker. There is no confirmed evidence of in-the-wild exploitation at this time, and it has not been added to the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog. The EPSS score is approximately 0.51%, indicating a currently low but non-negligible probability of exploitation in the near term (Feedly).

Exploitation steps

  1. Reconnaissance: Identify internet-facing Monkey HTTP Server instances (versions ≤ 1.8.5 or at commit f37e984) using network scanning tools such as Shodan, Censys, or Nmap with HTTP banner grabbing.
  2. Craft malicious HTTP request: Construct a specially crafted HTTP request designed to trigger the out-of-bounds read in the mk_vhost_fdt_close function during virtual host file descriptor cleanup. The exact triggering condition involves manipulating request parameters related to virtual host handling.
  3. Send the request: Transmit the crafted HTTP request to the target server on its listening port (typically TCP 80 or 443) without any authentication.
  4. Trigger DoS: The server's mk_vhost_fdt_close function reads out of bounds, causing a crash and rendering the HTTP server unavailable (Archer Advisory, GitHub Issue).

Indicators of compromise

  • Network: Unusual or malformed HTTP requests targeting the Monkey HTTP Server, particularly those with anomalous virtual host headers or request structures; repeated connection attempts from a single source IP resulting in server crashes.
  • Logs: Monkey server logs showing abrupt process termination or segmentation fault errors coinciding with specific HTTP requests; crash dump files generated by the Monkey process.
  • Process: Unexpected termination of the Monkey HTTP Server process (monkey or mk_server); repeated process restarts in a short time window if a supervisor/watchdog is configured.
  • File System: Core dump files (e.g., core.*) in the Monkey working directory following server crashes (Archer Advisory).

Mitigation and workarounds

As of the time of disclosure (January 2026), no official patch has been released by the Monkey project for this vulnerability — all affected versions up to and including 1.8.5 remain unpatched (Archer Advisory). Organizations should monitor the Monkey GitHub repository for patch releases. In the interim, implement network-level access controls (firewall rules, allowlists) to restrict HTTP access to the Monkey server to trusted IP ranges only. Additionally, deploy rate limiting and HTTP request filtering at a reverse proxy or WAF layer to reduce exposure, and monitor server logs for anomalous request patterns indicative of exploitation attempts.

Community reactions

Red Hat has acknowledged the vulnerability and published a tracking page for CVE-2025-63653, though no Red Hat products are currently listed as affected (Red Hat CVE). The vulnerability was reported by researcher archersec, who disclosed a total of nine vulnerabilities in Monkey HTTP Server simultaneously, noting that none had been fixed at the time of disclosure. The GitHub issue filed by archersec in September 2025 has been closed without a corresponding fix being merged (GitHub Issue).

Additional resources


SourceThis report was generated using AI

Related Linux Alpine vulnerabilities:

CVE ID

Severity

Score

Technologies

Component name

CISA KEV exploit

Has fix

Published date

CVE-2026-5917CRITICAL9.4
  • Bat logoBat
  • rust-std-static
NoYesAug 11, 2026
CVE-2026-45699HIGH7.5
  • Linux Debian logoLinux Debian
  • netatalk
NoYesAug 14, 2026
CVE-2026-45808HIGH7.1
  • Wolfi logoWolfi
  • openbao-vault-compat
NoYesAug 07, 2026
CVE-2026-46405MEDIUM5.3
  • Wolfi logoWolfi
  • github.com/openbao/openbao
NoYesAug 07, 2026
CVE-2026-47766MEDIUM5.1
  • Linux Debian logoLinux Debian
  • crun
NoYesAug 14, 2026

Free Vulnerability Assessment

Benchmark your Cloud Security Posture

Evaluate your cloud security practices across 9 security domains to benchmark your risk level and identify gaps in your defenses.

Request assessment

Get a personalized demo

Ready to see Wiz in action?

"Best User Experience I have ever seen, provides full visibility to cloud workloads."
David EstlickCISO
"Wiz provides a single pane of glass to see what is going on in our cloud environments."
Adam FletcherChief Security Officer
"We know that if Wiz identifies something as critical, it actually is."
Greg PoniatowskiHead of Threat and Vulnerability Management