CVE-2025-69228: 
Wolfi vulnerability analysis and mitigation

Overview

CVE-2025-69228 is a Denial of Service vulnerability in AIOHTTP, an asynchronous HTTP client/server framework for asyncio and Python, caused by uncontrolled memory allocation when processing crafted multipart POST requests. It affects all versions of aiohttp up to and including 3.13.2, and was disclosed on January 5, 2026, with a fix released in version 3.13.3. The vulnerability carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.5 (High) and a CVSS v4.0 base score of 6.6 (Medium) (GitHub Advisory, Red Hat Bugzilla).

Technical details

The root cause is classified as CWE-770 (Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling). Specifically, the size variable tracking multipart field sizes in the Request.post() method was incorrectly reset to zero at the start of each loop iteration rather than being initialized once before the loop, meaning the cumulative size check against client_max_size was never effectively enforced across multiple multipart fields. An unauthenticated remote attacker can craft a multipart POST request with many fields or oversized payloads targeting any endpoint that calls Request.post(), causing the server's memory to grow unboundedly until the process is frozen or killed. The fix (commit b7dbd35) moves the size = 0 initialization outside the while loop so that the total accumulated size of all multipart fields is correctly compared against the configured limit (GitHub Commit, GitHub Advisory).

Impact

Successful exploitation results in complete availability loss for the affected aiohttp server process — the server's memory fills up uncontrollably, effectively freezing or crashing the service and denying access to all legitimate users. There is no impact on confidentiality or integrity; the attack is purely a Denial of Service. Applications built on aiohttp that expose any endpoint using Request.post() for multipart form handling are at risk, and the impact extends to downstream users and services depending on the affected server (GitHub Advisory, Red Hat Bugzilla).

Exploitability

No public proof-of-concept exploit code or in-the-wild exploitation has been reported as of the time of writing. The vulnerability requires no authentication, no special privileges, and no user interaction, making it trivially exploitable by any network-accessible attacker against a vulnerable endpoint. The EPSS score is approximately 0.042–0.069%, indicating a low but non-negligible probability of exploitation in the near term. The vulnerability is not currently listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog (GitHub Advisory).

Exploitation steps

  1. Reconnaissance: Identify internet-facing services running aiohttp versions ≤ 3.13.2 using banner grabbing, Shodan, or Censys. Look for Python/aiohttp in HTTP response headers.
  2. Identify target endpoint: Locate an application endpoint that processes multipart form data (i.e., calls Request.post() internally), such as file upload or form submission handlers.
  3. Craft malicious multipart POST request: Construct an HTTP POST request with Content-Type: multipart/form-data containing either a very large number of fields or individual fields with extremely large payloads, designed to bypass the per-field size reset bug.
  4. Send the request: Transmit the crafted request to the target endpoint using tools such as curl, requests (Python), or a custom script. The server will begin buffering the multipart data into memory without enforcing the cumulative size limit.
  5. Exhaust server memory: Repeat or sustain the request (or send multiple concurrent requests) to accelerate memory exhaustion, causing the aiohttp server process to freeze or crash, resulting in a denial of service for all users (GitHub Advisory, GitHub Commit).

Indicators of compromise

  • Network: Unusually large or numerous HTTP POST requests to endpoints that accept multipart form data; requests with abnormally high Content-Length values or many multipart boundary segments from a single or small set of source IPs.
  • Logs: Aiohttp access logs showing repeated large POST requests to the same endpoint in a short time window; application logs showing memory-related errors or OOM (Out of Memory) conditions.
  • Process: Rapid and sustained growth in the aiohttp server process's memory consumption (observable via top, htop, or system monitoring tools); server process becoming unresponsive or terminating unexpectedly.
  • System: OS-level OOM killer events in /var/log/syslog or dmesg output referencing the Python/aiohttp process; sudden service unavailability coinciding with high memory usage.

Mitigation and workarounds

The primary remediation is to upgrade aiohttp to version 3.13.3 or later, which enforces client_max_size correctly across the entire multipart form rather than resetting the counter per field. As a temporary workaround, operators can place a reverse proxy (e.g., nginx or HAProxy) in front of the aiohttp application and configure strict request body size limits at the proxy layer to reject oversized multipart requests before they reach the application. Additionally, rate-limiting POST requests at the network or application layer can reduce the risk of exploitation. IBM has also released patches for affected products including watsonx Orchestrate, Guardium Data Security Center, and Instana Observability (GitHub Advisory, IBM watsonx Advisory, IBM Guardium Advisory, IBM Instana Advisory).

Community reactions

The vulnerability was reported by security researchers ThomasRinsma and Finder16, with remediation developed by Dreamsorcerer from the aiohttp maintainer team (GitHub Advisory). Security news outlet SecurityOnline.info covered the disclosure as part of a broader report on seven vulnerabilities patched in aiohttp, highlighting the high-severity DoS risks. Red Hat, IBM, SUSE, Ubuntu, Debian, Splunk, and Dell have all issued advisories or patches for their products that bundle aiohttp, indicating broad industry awareness and response to this vulnerability.

Additional resources

Linux Distribution fix status

Fix availability across major Linux distributions and their releases.

Debian

Fixed

bookworm

python-aiohttp

Affected

sid

python-aiohttp: 3.13.3-1

Fixed

trixie

python-aiohttp: 3.11.16-1+deb13u1

Fixed

Ubuntu

Fixed

bionic (esm-apps)

python-aiohttp: 3.0.1-1ubuntu0.1~esm6

Fixed

devel

python-aiohttp

Not Affected

focal (esm-apps)

python-aiohttp: 3.6.2-1ubuntu1+esm5

Fixed

jammy

python-aiohttp

Affected

jammy (esm-apps)

python-aiohttp: 3.8.1-4ubuntu0.2+esm2

Fixed

noble

python-aiohttp

Affected

noble (esm-apps)

python-aiohttp: 3.9.1-1ubuntu0.1+esm2

Fixed

questing

python-aiohttp: 3.11.16-1ubuntu0.1

Fixed

RHEL / CentOS

Unknown

Alpine

Fixed

edge

py3-aiohttp: 3.13.3-r0

Fixed

v3.23

py3-aiohttp: 3.13.3-r0

Fixed

Source: This report was generated using AI

Related Wolfi vulnerabilities:

CVE ID

Severity

Score

Technologies

Component name

CISA KEV exploit

Has fix

Published date

CVE-2026-115567MEDIUM5.8
  • Rust logoRust
  • yazi
NoYesOct 23, 2026
CVE-2026-115892MEDIUM5.7
  • Rust logoRust
  • zed
NoYesOct 23, 2026
CVE-2026-115897LOW2.1
  • JavaScript logoJavaScript
  • serialize-javascript
NoYesOct 23, 2026
CVE-2026-115369LOW2.1
  • Wolfi logoWolfi
  • openbao
NoYesOct 22, 2026
CVE-2026-115366LOW2
  • Wolfi logoWolfi
  • openbao
NoYesOct 22, 2026

Free Vulnerability Assessment

Benchmark your Cloud Security Posture

Evaluate your cloud security practices across 9 security domains to benchmark your risk level and identify gaps in your defenses.

Request assessment

Additional Wiz resources

Get a personalized demo

Ready to see Wiz in action?

"Best User Experience I have ever seen, provides full visibility to cloud workloads."
David EstlickCISO
"Wiz provides a single pane of glass to see what is going on in our cloud environments."
Adam FletcherChief Security Officer
"We know that if Wiz identifies something as critical, it actually is."
Greg PoniatowskiHead of Threat and Vulnerability Management