CVE-2026-23233
Linux Kernel vulnerability analysis and mitigation

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

f2fs: fix to avoid mapping wrong physical block for swapfile

Xiaolong Guo reported a f2fs bug in bugzilla [1]

[1] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=220951

Quoted:

"When using stress-ng's swap stress test on F2FS filesystem with kernel 6.6+, the system experiences data corruption leading to either: 1 dm-verity corruption errors and device reboot 2 F2FS node corruption errors and boot hangs

The issue occurs specifically when: 1 Using F2FS filesystem (ext4 is unaffected) 2 Swapfile size is less than F2FS section size (2MB) 3 Swapfile has fragmented physical layout (multiple non-contiguous extents) 4 Kernel version is 6.6+ (6.1 is unaffected)

The root cause is in check_swap_activate() function in fs/f2fs/data.c. When the first extent of a small swapfile (< 2MB) is not aligned to section boundaries, the function incorrectly treats it as the last extent, failing to map subsequent extents. This results in incorrect swap_extent creation where only the first extent is mapped, causing subsequent swap writes to overwrite wrong physical locations (other files' data).

Steps to Reproduce 1 Setup a device with F2FS-formatted userdata partition 2 Compile stress-ng from https://github.com/ColinIanKing/stress-ng 3 Run swap stress test: (Android devices) adb shell "cd /data/stressng; ./stress-ng-64 --metrics-brief --timeout 60 --swap 0"

Log: 1 Ftrace shows in kernel 6.6, only first extent is mapped during second f2fs_map_blocks call in check_swap_activate(): stress-ng-swap-8990: f2fs_map_blocks: ino=11002, file offset=0, start blkaddr=0x43143, len=0x1 (Only 4KB mapped, not the full swapfile) 2 in kernel 6.1, both extents are correctly mapped: stress-ng-swap-5966: f2fs_map_blocks: ino=28011, file offset=0, start blkaddr=0x13cd4, len=0x1 stress-ng-swap-5966: f2fs_map_blocks: ino=28011, file offset=1, start blkaddr=0x60c84b, len=0xff

The problematic code is in check_swap_activate(): if ((pblock - SM_I(sbi)->main_blkaddr) % blks_per_sec || nr_pblocks % blks_per_sec || !f2fs_valid_pinned_area(sbi, pblock)) { bool last_extent = false;

not_aligned++;

nr_pblocks = roundup(nr_pblocks, blks_per_sec);
if (cur_lblock + nr_pblocks > sis->max)
    nr_pblocks -= blks_per_sec;

/* this extent is last one */
if (!nr_pblocks) {
    nr_pblocks = last_lblock - cur_lblock;
    last_extent = true;
}

ret = f2fs_migrate_blocks(inode, cur_lblock, nr_pblocks);
if (ret) {
    if (ret == -ENOENT)
        ret = -EINVAL;
    goto out;
}

if (!last_extent)
    goto retry;

}

When the first extent is unaligned and roundup(nr_pblocks, blks_per_sec) exceeds sis->max, we subtract blks_per_sec resulting in nr_pblocks = 0. The code then incorrectly assumes this is the last extent, sets nr_pblocks = last_lblock - cur_lblock (entire swapfile), and performs migration. After migration, it doesn't retry mapping, so subsequent extents are never processed. "

In order to fix this issue, we need to lookup block mapping info after we migrate all blocks in the tail of swapfile.


SourceNVD

Related Linux Kernel vulnerabilities:

CVE ID

Severity

Score

Technologies

Component name

CISA KEV exploit

Has fix

Published date

CVE-2026-31408HIGH7.8
  • Linux KernelLinux Kernel
  • bpftool
NoYesApr 06, 2026
CVE-2026-31407HIGH7.1
  • Linux KernelLinux Kernel
  • python-perf
NoYesApr 06, 2026
CVE-2026-31411N/AN/A
  • Linux KernelLinux Kernel
  • kernel-64k-debug-modules-partner
NoYesApr 08, 2026
CVE-2026-31406N/AN/A
  • Linux KernelLinux Kernel
  • kernel-rt-modules-extra
NoYesApr 06, 2026
CVE-2026-31404N/AN/A
  • Linux KernelLinux Kernel
  • kernel-ipaclones-internal
NoYesApr 03, 2026

Free Vulnerability Assessment

Benchmark your Cloud Security Posture

Evaluate your cloud security practices across 9 security domains to benchmark your risk level and identify gaps in your defenses.

Request assessment

Get a personalized demo

Ready to see Wiz in action?

"Best User Experience I have ever seen, provides full visibility to cloud workloads."
David EstlickCISO
"Wiz provides a single pane of glass to see what is going on in our cloud environments."
Adam FletcherChief Security Officer
"We know that if Wiz identifies something as critical, it actually is."
Greg PoniatowskiHead of Threat and Vulnerability Management