
Cloud Vulnerability DB
A community-led vulnerabilities database
CVE-2026-25738 is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Indico, an open-source event management system developed by CERN. The flaw affects all versions of Indico prior to 3.3.10 and arises because the application makes outgoing HTTP requests to user-provided URLs without adequately restricting access to sensitive internal targets such as localhost or cloud metadata endpoints. The vulnerability was published on February 17, 2026, and patched in the same release. It carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 4.3 (Medium) and a CVSS v4.0 base score of 6.9 (Medium) (Github Advisory).
The root cause is a combination of CWE-918 (Server-Side Request Forgery) and CWE-367 (Time-of-Check Time-of-Use / TOCTOU Race Condition). Indico's validate_request_url function performs a DNS lookup to check whether a user-supplied URL resolves to a private IP address before making the outbound request; however, an attacker can exploit DNS rebinding to pass this check — the initial DNS resolution returns a public IP, but a subsequent resolution (at connection time) returns a private/internal IP, bypassing the block. The patch (commit 70d3418) monkey-patches socket.getaddrinfo to cache resolved addresses per request context and raises an InsecureRequestError if a new resolution for the same host yields a private IP not seen in the first lookup, effectively closing the TOCTOU window (Github Commit, Github Advisory).
Successful exploitation allows an authenticated event organizer to cause the Indico server to issue HTTP GET requests to internal network resources, including localhost services and cloud instance metadata endpoints (e.g., AWS IMDSv1 at 169.254.169.254), and retrieve the responses. The impact is limited to confidentiality — no integrity or availability impact is expected — and is most severe in cloud-hosted deployments where metadata endpoints expose credentials or configuration without authentication. Organizations that do not expose sensitive unauthenticated services on internal IPs, or that fully trust their event organizers, face minimal practical risk (Github Advisory, Indico Release).
No public proof-of-concept exploit code has been identified, and there is no evidence of in-the-wild exploitation as of the time of writing. The EPSS score is approximately 0.075% (roughly the 20th percentile), indicating a low near-term exploitation probability. Exploitation requires an attacker to hold event organizer privileges within an Indico instance, which limits the attack surface. The vulnerability is not listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog (Github Advisory).
is_private_url check), then rapidly switches the DNS response to a target internal IP (e.g., 169.254.169.254 for AWS metadata, or 127.0.0.1 for localhost services).169.254.169.254 (AWS IMDSv1), fd00::/8 (IPv6 link-local), or other RFC-1918 addresses (e.g., 10.0.0.0/8, 172.16.0.0/12, 192.168.0.0/16) that are not expected in normal operation.InsecureRequestError: Possible DNS rebinding attack messages (present only after patching to 3.3.10).Upgrade Indico to version 3.3.10 or later, which patches the DNS rebinding vector by caching getaddrinfo results and blocking subsequent resolutions that yield private IPs (Indico Release). As a defense-in-depth measure (applicable both before and after patching), configure the http_proxy and https_proxy environment variables on both the indico-uwsgi and indico-celery services to route outbound requests through a proxy that enforces allowlists or blocklists for internal IP ranges. Additionally, restrict event organizer privileges to fully trusted users, and implement network-level controls (e.g., host-based firewall rules or cloud security groups) to prevent the Indico server from reaching sensitive internal endpoints such as the cloud instance metadata service (Github Advisory).
The vulnerability was reported by three independent researchers (rahulgovind, inkz, and yueyueL) and was promptly addressed by the Indico maintainer (ThiefMaster) in the same release that disclosed it. A blog post from PentesterLab titled "When the patch doesn't fix the vulnerability" was published in a later timeframe, suggesting ongoing community interest in the completeness of the fix. Red Hat also tracked the advisory, indicating awareness among enterprise Linux distributors (Github Advisory).
Source: This report was generated using AI
Free Vulnerability Assessment
Evaluate your cloud security practices across 9 security domains to benchmark your risk level and identify gaps in your defenses.
Get a personalized demo
"Best User Experience I have ever seen, provides full visibility to cloud workloads."
"Wiz provides a single pane of glass to see what is going on in our cloud environments."
"We know that if Wiz identifies something as critical, it actually is."