
Cloud Vulnerability DB
A community-led vulnerabilities database
CVE-2026-28465 is an improper authentication vulnerability in OpenClaw's optional voice-call plugin that allows remote attackers to bypass webhook verification by supplying spoofed forwarded headers. It affects @openclaw/voice-call versions before 2026.2.3 and the legacy @clawdbot/voice-call package (all versions ≤ 2026.1.24, with no patch available under that package name). The vulnerability was published on March 5, 2026, and a fix was committed on March 9, 2026. It carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.5 (High) per Feedly/NVD data, though the GitHub advisory rates it as Moderate (5.9) due to higher attack complexity assumptions (GitHub Advisory, Feedly).
The root cause is classified as CWE-345 (Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity) and CWE-290 (Authentication Bypass by Spoofing). In certain reverse-proxy or tunnel configurations, the plugin used Forwarded or X-Forwarded-* HTTP headers to reconstruct the public webhook URL for signature verification, but did not validate whether those headers originated from a trusted proxy. An attacker can directly supply crafted X-Forwarded-Host or Forwarded headers in their HTTP request, causing the plugin to reconstruct an attacker-controlled URL and accept a spoofed webhook payload as legitimate. Exploitation requires a deployment where the reverse proxy does not strip or overwrite these headers before they reach the application (GitHub Advisory, Patch Commit).
Successful exploitation allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to inject malicious webhook payloads that the voice-call plugin processes as legitimate events, resulting in a high integrity impact. Attackers can spoof voice-call webhook events (e.g., call status updates, recordings, or control signals), potentially gaining unauthorized access to sensitive call data or triggering unauthorized actions within the plugin. Confidentiality and availability are not directly impacted, but the ability to inject arbitrary webhook events could be leveraged for further abuse of the voice-call workflow (GitHub Advisory, Feedly).
There is no public proof-of-concept exploit and no evidence of in-the-wild exploitation as of the time of reporting. The EPSS score is approximately 0.033%, indicating a low probability of exploitation in the near term. The vulnerability is not listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog. Exploitation requires a specific precondition — a reverse-proxy configuration that does not strip untrusted forwarded headers — which limits the attack surface to misconfigured deployments (Feedly, GitHub Advisory).
X-Forwarded-* or Forwarded headers./voice/webhook) with a spoofed X-Forwarded-Host header set to an attacker-controlled hostname, and a webhook payload mimicking a legitimate provider event (e.g., Twilio or Plivo call status)./voice/webhook) containing X-Forwarded-Host, X-Forwarded-For, or Forwarded headers with external or unknown hostnames not matching the configured public URL.Upgrade the @openclaw/voice-call npm package to version 2026.2.3 or later, which ignores forwarded headers by default unless explicitly trusted via the new webhookSecurity configuration block. Users of the legacy @clawdbot/voice-call package should migrate to @openclaw/voice-call >= 2026.2.3, as no patch will be published under the old package name. As an immediate workaround for those unable to upgrade, strip Forwarded and X-Forwarded-* headers at the edge/reverse-proxy before they reach the application. After upgrading, configure webhookSecurity.allowedHosts and/or webhookSecurity.trustedProxyIPs to explicitly allowlist trusted hosts and proxy IPs (GitHub Advisory, Patch Commit).
The vulnerability was reported by security researcher @0x5t and disclosed via the GitHub Security Advisory program by OpenClaw maintainer steipete. The advisory was rated Moderate by the project, reflecting that exploitation requires a specific misconfigured proxy environment. Brief mentions appeared on Mastodon (via @thehackerwire) and aggregator sites such as RedPacket Security and VulnDB shortly after disclosure, but no significant broader media coverage or notable researcher commentary has been observed (GitHub Advisory).
Source: This report was generated using AI
Free Vulnerability Assessment
Evaluate your cloud security practices across 9 security domains to benchmark your risk level and identify gaps in your defenses.
Get a personalized demo
"Best User Experience I have ever seen, provides full visibility to cloud workloads."
"Wiz provides a single pane of glass to see what is going on in our cloud environments."
"We know that if Wiz identifies something as critical, it actually is."