CVE-2026-31826: 
Python vulnerability analysis and mitigation

Overview

CVE-2026-31826 is a denial-of-service vulnerability in pypdf, a free and open-source pure-Python PDF library, caused by improper handling of manipulated stream length values that can exhaust system RAM. An attacker can craft a malicious PDF containing a content stream with an inflated /Length value that does not match the actual data length, causing the library to allocate excessive memory during parsing. All pypdf versions prior to 6.8.0 are affected; the vulnerability was disclosed on March 9, 2026, and published to the NVD on March 10, 2026. It carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 5.5 (Medium) and a CVSS v4.0 base score of 6.8 (Medium) (Github Advisory, Red Hat Bugzilla).

Technical details

The root cause is CWE-770 (Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling): pypdf's content stream parser trusts the /Length dictionary value in a PDF stream object without validating it against the actual available data, leading to unbounded memory allocation. An attacker crafts a PDF where the /Length field specifies a very large value (e.g., 2 GB) while the actual stream data is minimal; when pypdf reads the stream from a buffer of unknown size (such as one returned by open("file.pdf", mode="rb")), it attempts to allocate memory proportional to the declared length. The fix, implemented in PR #3675, limits the allowed /Length value to prevent excessive allocation (pypdf Security Advisory, pypdf PR #3675). Notably, passing a file path or a BytesIO buffer to pypdf does not appear to trigger the vulnerability — only reading from raw file buffers of unknown size is affected (Github Advisory).

Impact

Successful exploitation results in excessive memory consumption on the host running pypdf, potentially crashing the application or exhausting system resources and causing denial of service to legitimate users. There is no impact on confidentiality or integrity — only availability is affected. Applications that automatically process user-supplied or externally sourced PDF files (e.g., document management systems, AI pipelines using pypdf) are at greatest risk, as a single crafted PDF can trigger resource exhaustion (Github Advisory, Red Hat Bugzilla).

Exploitability

There is no public proof-of-concept exploit code and no evidence of in-the-wild exploitation at this time (Github Advisory). The EPSS score is approximately 0.013% (0th percentile), indicating a very low probability of exploitation in the near term. The vulnerability is not listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog. Exploitation requires passive user interaction — a victim application or user must open or parse the crafted PDF — and no threat actor attribution has been reported.

Exploitation steps

  1. Craft a malicious PDF: Create a PDF file containing a content stream object where the /Length dictionary entry is set to an extremely large value (e.g., 2,147,483,648 for ~2 GB), while the actual stream data is minimal or empty.
  2. Deliver the PDF to the target: Distribute the crafted PDF to a system or application that uses pypdf prior to version 6.8.0 to parse PDF files — for example, by uploading it to a document processing service, emailing it to a user, or placing it in a monitored directory.
  3. Trigger parsing via a raw file buffer: Ensure the application opens the PDF using a raw file buffer (e.g., open("file.pdf", mode="rb")), which is the code path vulnerable to this issue. Applications passing file paths or BytesIO objects are not affected.
  4. Observe memory exhaustion: When pypdf parses the content stream, it allocates memory proportional to the declared /Length value, rapidly consuming available RAM and potentially crashing the application or the host system (pypdf Security Advisory, pypdf PR #3675).

Indicators of compromise

  • Process Behavior: Sudden and sustained spike in memory usage by the Python process running pypdf, potentially reaching system memory limits shortly after opening a PDF file.
  • Logs: Application crash logs or out-of-memory (OOM) errors in system logs (e.g., Linux kernel OOM killer messages) correlated with PDF parsing activity.
  • File System: Presence of unexpected or externally sourced PDF files with unusually small file sizes but anomalous internal /Length values in stream objects (detectable via PDF forensic tools).
  • Application Logs: Errors or exceptions from pypdf during stream parsing, particularly related to memory allocation failures when processing specific PDF files.

Mitigation and workarounds

The primary remediation is to upgrade pypdf to version 6.8.0 or later, which limits the allowed /Length value in stream objects (pypdf Release 6.8.0). For environments where immediate patching is not possible, the changes from PR #3675 can be applied manually as a workaround (pypdf PR #3675). Additionally, as a short-term mitigation, pass file paths or BytesIO buffers to pypdf instead of raw file handles opened with open("file.pdf", mode="rb"), as this code path does not appear to trigger the vulnerability. Restricting PDF processing to trusted sources and monitoring applications for abnormal memory consumption are also recommended defensive measures (Github Advisory). IBM has also released a patch for affected watsonx Orchestrate products (IBM Advisory).

Community reactions

The vulnerability was reported by researcher iconnnjka and analyzed by pypdf maintainer stefan6419846, who promptly released the fix in version 6.8.0 on March 9, 2026 (pypdf Security Advisory). Red Hat tracked the issue via Bugzilla and Oracle included it in their April 2026 security bulletin, indicating broad awareness across enterprise software vendors (Red Hat Bugzilla, Oracle Advisory). No significant social media controversy or widespread community debate has been observed around this vulnerability.

Additional resources

Linux Distribution fix status

Fix availability across major Linux distributions and their releases.

Debian

Fixed

bookworm

pypdf2

Affected

sid

pypdf: 6.9.0-1

Fixed

trixie

pypdf

Affected

Ubuntu

Unknown

devel

pypdf

Unknown

noble

pypdf

Unknown

noble (esm-apps)

pypdf

Unknown

resolute

pypdf

Unknown

resolute (esm-apps)

pypdf

Unknown

RHEL / CentOS

Unknown

Source: This report was generated using AI

Related Python vulnerabilities:

CVE ID

Severity

Score

Technologies

Component name

CISA KEV exploit

Has fix

Published date

GHSA-v2f8-6655-7grjCRITICAL10
  • Python logoPython
  • vibe-trading-ai
NoYesOct 02, 2026
CVE-2026-105782HIGH7.5
  • Python logoPython
  • scrapy
NoYesOct 06, 2026
GHSA-v853-p72q-4cfwHIGH7.5
  • Python logoPython
  • quart
NoYesOct 05, 2026
CVE-2026-105751MEDIUM6.9
  • Python logoPython
  • docling
NoYesOct 05, 2026
CVE-2026-105750MEDIUM5.9
  • Python logoPython
  • docling
NoYesOct 05, 2026

Free Vulnerability Assessment

Benchmark your Cloud Security Posture

Evaluate your cloud security practices across 9 security domains to benchmark your risk level and identify gaps in your defenses.

Request assessment

Get a personalized demo

Ready to see Wiz in action?

"Best User Experience I have ever seen, provides full visibility to cloud workloads."
David EstlickCISO
"Wiz provides a single pane of glass to see what is going on in our cloud environments."
Adam FletcherChief Security Officer
"We know that if Wiz identifies something as critical, it actually is."
Greg PoniatowskiHead of Threat and Vulnerability Management