
Cloud Vulnerability DB
A community-led vulnerabilities database
CVE-2026-43009 is a Linux kernel BPF verifier vulnerability caused by incorrect pruning due to atomic fetch precision tracking. The flaw resides in the backtrack_insn function, which fails to properly handle BPF_STX instructions with BPF_ATOMIC and BPF_FETCH flags, leading to incorrect state equivalence decisions during path pruning. It affects Linux kernel versions from 5.12 up to (but not including) 6.19.12, as well as 7.0 release candidates (rc1–rc6). Disclosed on May 1, 2026, it carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.8 (High) (GitHub Advisory, Red Hat Bugzilla).
The root cause is classified as CWE-372 (Incomplete Internal State Distinction). When backtrack_insn encounters a BPF_STX instruction with BPF_ATOMIC | BPF_FETCH, the source register (or r0 for BPF_CMPXCHG) acts as both input and destination — it receives the old value from the memory location. The backtracking logic incorrectly treats this as a regular store, failing to propagate precision to the associated stack slot, which is then left unmarked as precise. As a result, the BPF verifier's path pruning logic may incorrectly consider two program states equivalent when they differ in stack state, allowing branches that should remain distinct to be incorrectly pruned. The fix extends BPF_LDX handling in backtrack_insn to cover atomic fetch operations via a new is_atomic_fetch_insn() helper, clearing the tracked fetch destination register and propagating precision to the stack slot (GitHub Advisory, Red Hat Bugzilla).
Successful exploitation allows a local attacker with low privileges to load crafted BPF programs that bypass the kernel verifier's safety checks due to incorrect state pruning. This can lead to execution of BPF programs with unintended behavior, potentially enabling privilege escalation, information disclosure, or denial of service. The impact is most severe on systems where unprivileged users are permitted to load BPF programs, as the verifier is the primary security boundary for BPF program safety (GitHub Advisory, Feedly).
There is no public proof-of-concept exploit and no evidence of in-the-wild exploitation as of the time of writing. The vulnerability requires local access and low privileges (e.g., the ability to load BPF programs). The EPSS score is approximately 0.018%, indicating a low near-term exploitation probability. CVE-2026-43009 is not currently listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog (GitHub Advisory, Feedly).
kernel.unprivileged_bpf_disabled = 0).atomic64_fetch_add, BPF_CMPXCHG) in a way that exploits the precision tracking gap — specifically, constructing program paths where the verifier's pruning incorrectly treats two states as equivalent due to the unmarked stack slot.bpf() syscall (e.g., via BPF_PROG_LOAD) to submit the crafted program. The flawed verifier accepts it due to incorrect pruning.bpf() syscall invocations (BPF_PROG_LOAD) from unprivileged user accounts; unexpected BPF program load events in /var/log/audit/audit.log.bpf() syscall, particularly from non-root users; processes spawning with elevated capabilities after BPF program execution..o) or BPF loader scripts in user home directories or /tmp.Apply the upstream kernel patch that fixes backtrack_insn to correctly handle atomic fetch operations via the is_atomic_fetch_insn() helper; patches are available at the stable kernel tree commits (git.kernel.org patch 1, git.kernel.org patch 2). Update to Linux kernel 6.19.12 or later (or a patched 7.0 release). SUSE has released security updates (SUSE-SU-2026:2217-1 and SUSE-SU-2026:2238-1) addressing this issue. As an interim workaround, restrict BPF program loading to privileged users only by setting kernel.unprivileged_bpf_disabled=1 via sysctl (GitHub Advisory, Feedly).
Red Hat opened a Bugzilla tracking entry (Bug 2464430) and classified the issue as medium severity, with the upstream advisory referenced from the linux-cve-announce mailing list. The Yocto Project security mailing list discussed the vulnerability across multiple messages, indicating active tracking by embedded Linux communities. No significant public researcher commentary or media coverage beyond standard vulnerability tracking has been observed (Red Hat Bugzilla).
Source: This report was generated using AI
Free Vulnerability Assessment
Evaluate your cloud security practices across 9 security domains to benchmark your risk level and identify gaps in your defenses.
Get a personalized demo
"Best User Experience I have ever seen, provides full visibility to cloud workloads."
"Wiz provides a single pane of glass to see what is going on in our cloud environments."
"We know that if Wiz identifies something as critical, it actually is."