Vulnerability DatabaseGHSA-2vg6-77g8-24mp

GHSA-2vg6-77g8-24mp
JavaScript vulnerability analysis and mitigation

Am I affected?

Users are affected if all of the following are true:

  • They configure secondaryStorage on betterAuth(...) (Redis, KV, or any external session cache).
  • session.storeSessionInDatabase is left unset or set to false (the default).
  • Their application's deployment uses one or more of:
    • The admin plugin and calls auth.api.removeUser(...) or authClient.admin.removeUser(...).
    • The anonymous plugin and exposes /delete-anonymous-user or relies on the after-link hook to clean up the anonymous user.
    • The @better-auth/scim plugin and exposes DELETE /scim/v2/Users/:userId. If storeSessionInDatabase is true, sessions are also written to the database, and the database delete cascades; users are not affected. Fix:
  1. Upgrade to better-auth@<patched-version> or later (and @better-auth/scim@<patched-version> if they use SCIM).
  2. If they cannot upgrade, see workarounds below.

Summary

When secondaryStorage is configured and storeSessionInDatabase is false, three user-deletion endpoints in better-auth plus one in @better-auth/scim call internalAdapter.deleteUser(userId) without first calling internalAdapter.deleteSessions(userId). The deleted user's session payload (which carries a cached user object) remains in secondary storage, and internalAdapter.findSession(token) keeps returning it as a valid session until the session TTL elapses (default 7 days).

Details

The vulnerable call sites are:

  • admin plugin's removeUser (packages/better-auth/src/plugins/admin/routes.ts:1463).
  • anonymous plugin's self-delete endpoint (packages/better-auth/src/plugins/anonymous/index.ts:222).
  • anonymous plugin's after-link hook (packages/better-auth/src/plugins/anonymous/index.ts:325).
  • @better-auth/scim's DELETE /scim/v2/Users/:userId (packages/scim/src/routes.ts:1019). Working callers that already do the right thing: the core /delete-user self-delete and /delete-user/callback (packages/better-auth/src/api/routes/update-user.ts:551). The fix shape extends each vulnerable caller to invoke deleteSessions(userId) before deleteUser(userId). The architectural follow-up centralizes the cleanup inside deleteUser itself or introduces a single deleteUserAndSessions orchestrator so future callers cannot regress this contract.

Patches

Fixed in better-auth@<patched-version> and @better-auth/scim@<patched-version>. All four user-deletion call sites now invoke deleteSessions(userId) before deleteUser(userId) so sessions are evicted from secondary storage at the same time the user row is removed.

Workarounds

If users cannot upgrade immediately:

  • Configuration-level: set session.storeSessionInDatabase: true. Subsequent user-delete writes reach the session table and the database cascade removes rows. Increases write volume for high-throughput sessions but eliminates the gap.
  • Code-level (admin path): when calling auth.api.removeUser, also call auth.api.revokeUserSessions({ body: { userId } }), which uses deleteSessions internally.
  • Code-level (SCIM path): wrap their SCIM provider's deprovisioning hook to call auth.api.revokeUserSessions(...) after the SCIM DELETE.
  • Code-level (anonymous path): in onLinkAccount, explicitly call internalAdapter.deleteSessions(anonymousUser.user.id) before allowing the new session to be issued.

Impact

  • Stale session validity: a deleted user's existing session cookie continues to authenticate against getSessionFromCtx until the session TTL elapses (default 7 days). Within that window, the deleted user retains their pre-existing read and write surface.
  • SCIM-driven deprovisioning gap: organizations using SCIM to revoke offboarded employees' access do not, in fact, revoke active sessions. The deleted account remains usable for up to 7 days after deprovisioning.

Credit

Reported by @iruizsalinas.

Resources


SourceNVD

Related JavaScript vulnerabilities:

CVE ID

Severity

Score

Technologies

Component name

CISA KEV exploit

Has fix

Published date

GHSA-8mv7-9c27-98vcMEDIUM5.1
  • JavaScript logoJavaScript
  • astro
NoYesJul 20, 2026
CVE-2026-59729MEDIUM5.1
  • JavaScript logoJavaScript
  • astro
NoYesJul 20, 2026
CVE-2026-59728MEDIUM4.3
  • JavaScript logoJavaScript
  • @astrojs/rss
NoYesJul 20, 2026
GHSA-hp3v-mfqw-h74cLOW3.7
  • JavaScript logoJavaScript
  • @astrojs/netlify
NoYesJul 20, 2026
CVE-2026-59730LOW2.1
  • JavaScript logoJavaScript
  • @astrojs/node
NoYesJul 20, 2026

Free Vulnerability Assessment

Benchmark your Cloud Security Posture

Evaluate your cloud security practices across 9 security domains to benchmark your risk level and identify gaps in your defenses.

Request assessment

Get a personalized demo

Ready to see Wiz in action?

"Best User Experience I have ever seen, provides full visibility to cloud workloads."
David EstlickCISO
"Wiz provides a single pane of glass to see what is going on in our cloud environments."
Adam FletcherChief Security Officer
"We know that if Wiz identifies something as critical, it actually is."
Greg PoniatowskiHead of Threat and Vulnerability Management