GHSA-3q34-rx83-r6mq: 
vulnerability analysis and mitigation

Summary

Heimdall performs rule matching on the raw (non-normalized) request path, while downstream components may normalize dot-segments according to RFC 3986, Section 6.2.2.3. This discrepancy can result in heimdall authorizing a request for one path (e.g., /user/../admin, or URL-encoded variants such as /user/%2e%2e/admin or /user/%2e%2e%2fadmin. The latter would require the allow_encoded_slashes option to be set to on or no_decode.) while the downstream ultimately processes a different, normalized path (/admin).

Details

This vulnerability can be exploited by an adversary if rule matching is performed using free (named or unnamed) wildcards without further constraints, as shown in the example snippets below.

id: rule-1
match:
  routes:
    - path: /user/**
execute: # configured to require authentication and authorization
  # ...

id: rule-2
match:
  routes:
    - path: /public/**
execute: # configured to allow anonymous access
  # ...

If an adversary sends a request to /public/../user/whatever, rule-2 will be matched and executed. The downstream service may, however, normalize the request path and interpret it as /user/whatever.

Impact

Bypass of access control policies enforced by heimdall may lead to the following consequences:

• Access to or modification of data that should be restricted
• Invocation of functionality that is expected to require authentication or authorization
• In certain configurations, escalation of privileges depending on the exposed functionality

Workarounds

• Normalize HTTP paths or reject HTTP paths containing relative path expressions in the layers in front of Heimdall - this is good practice anyway. Some proxies do that by default, such as Traefik; others, such as Envoy, require additional configuration (for Envoy see normalize_path).
• Include the ID of the rule expected to be executed in the JWT issued by heimdall and check that value in the consuming project's service.