What is automated code review?
Automated code review is the process of using software tools to analyze source code for security vulnerabilities, bugs, and coding standard violations without human intervention. This means your development team can catch problems automatically before code gets deployed to production.
These tools examine your codebase against predefined rules and known vulnerability patterns. They flag potential issues like SQL injection flaws, hardcoded passwords, or insecure API calls. Unlike manual code reviews where humans read through code line by line, automated tools can scan thousands of lines in minutes.
Modern automated code review has evolved from basic linters that only check syntax errors. Today's machine learning-enhanced systems use techniques like semantic analysis and dataflow tracking to identify security issues that require understanding variable relationships and execution paths, making them more effective at finding complex vulnerabilities like advanced injection attacks and logic flaws.
Automated code review encompasses static application security testing (SAST) as one component within a broader security analysis framework. While traditional SAST tools primarily analyzed application source code, modern platforms have expanded to include dependency scanning, secrets detection, and infrastructure-as-code analysis. The term 'automated code review' typically refers to integrated platforms that combine multiple scanning techniques, whereas SAST specifically refers to the static analysis of application code for vulnerabilities.
Get the Application Security Best Practices [Cheat Sheet]
This 6-page guide goes beyond basics — it’s a deep dive into advanced, practical AppSec strategies for developers, security engineers, and DevOps teams.
What Does Automated Code Review Include?
Automated code review goes beyond syntax checks. It typically includes:
Static analysis to identify bugs and vulnerabilities in application source code.
Secrets detection to catch hardcoded credentials before they leak.
Software composition analysis (SCA) to flag vulnerable third-party libraries.
Infrastructure-as-Code (IaC) scanning to detect misconfigurations in Terraform, CloudFormation, or Kubernetes manifests.
Together, these capabilities provide coverage across code, dependencies, and infrastructure.
How Does It Differ From Other Testing?
Automated code review: Scans source code and config for bugs, vulnerabilities, and policy violations before runtime.
DAST: Tests running apps for vulnerabilities by simulating attacks.
IAST: Monitors code behavior in runtime for vulnerabilities.
Pen testing: Manual, scenario-based security testing.
These approaches work together for full coverage, but automated code review is the earliest and most scalable layer.
Core capabilities of automated code review systems
Automated code review systems offer several key capabilities that go far beyond basic syntax checking. These tools provide comprehensive analysis to ensure your code is secure and well-structured.
Vulnerability detection forms the foundation of these systems. They scan for common security flaws like those in the OWASP Top 10 and check for known CVEs in your dependencies, especially vulnerabilities listed in CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog, which tracks over 1,400 flaws actively targeted by attackers.
Configuration analysis examines both application settings and infrastructure code. The tools scan Infrastructure as Code templates for misconfigurations that could expose cloud resources. They also check application configuration files for insecure settings.
Advanced capabilities include:
Dependency scanning: Identifies vulnerable third-party libraries and suggests updates
Secrets detection: Finds hardcoded credentials, API keys, and certificates
Code complexity analysis: Flags overly complex functions that are hard to maintain and test
Compliance mapping: Helps align code and pipeline controls to requirements in frameworks like PCI DSS or HIPAA and provides evidence for audits.
Why automated code review matters for cloud security
Cloud environments amplify the impact of code vulnerabilities because of rapid deployment speeds and massive scale. Recent data shows 40% of breaches happen in cloud infrastructure, with a quarter tied to misconfigurations and exposed secrets.
A single misconfigured Infrastructure as Code template can create security holes across hundreds of cloud resources in minutes.
Traditional security reviews are too slow for cloud development cycles. Your team needs security checks that keep pace with continuous integration and deployment. Automated code review integrates directly into these fast workflows, catching cloud-specific risks at the source.
Key cloud security benefits:
Exposed secrets detection: Finds API keys, database passwords, and cloud credentials before they reach production—critical when 39 million secrets leaked on GitHub last year alone
Infrastructure misconfigurations: Catches overly permissive IAM roles and insecure resource settings in Terraform or CloudFormation
Container vulnerabilities: Scans Docker images and Kubernetes configurations for security flaws
Integrating automated code review into cloud security strategy
Effective automated code review requires integration with your broader cloud security strategy. This means moving beyond standalone scans to create continuous security throughout your development lifecycle.
Embedding scans in CI/CD pipelines creates configurable security gates that can either block deployments (hard gates) or provide warnings without stopping the pipeline (soft gates). Hard gates prevent code with critical vulnerabilities from reaching production, while soft gates allow teams to build security awareness gradually. However, comprehensive scans can add 2-15 minutes to build times depending on codebase size and scanning depth, so teams must balance security coverage with development velocity.
CI/CD Pipeline Security Best Practices [Cheat Sheet]
Secure your entire pipeline with our 13-page cheat sheet covering best practices for infrastructure security, code security, secrets management, and access controls.
Performance considerations are crucial for adoption. Incremental scanning that only analyzes changed code can significantly reduce scan times compared to full repository scans. Many platforms also offer parallel scanning and caching to minimize build time impact while maintaining comprehensive security coverage.
But the real power comes from correlating code findings with runtime cloud context.
Understanding how code actually runs in your cloud environment helps prioritize the most critical risks. A vulnerability in an internal service with no internet access poses less immediate risk than the same flaw in a public-facing API.
Integration strategies:
Policy as code: Define security rules that apply consistently across all environments
Risk-based gates: Allow deployments to proceed when vulnerabilities aren't actually exploitable
Automated remediation: Generate pull requests with fixes for common issues
Feedback loops: Use production insights to improve development-time security checks
Implementation challenges and best practices
Implementing automated code review successfully requires overcoming common obstacles that can derail adoption. The biggest challenge is alert fatigue from too many findings, especially false positives.
Your security team needs to tune detection sensitivity carefully. Start with high-confidence rules and baselines (e.g., suppression of known-acceptable findings), then gradually add more checks as your team adapts. This matters because 49% of teams say keeping up with new threats is their biggest security headache. Focus on providing actionable feedback that explains why something is risky and how to fix it.
Best practices for smooth implementation:
Start non-blocking: Begin with informational alerts before enforcing hard gates that stop deployments
Prioritize by risk: Focus on vulnerabilities that are actually exploitable in your environment
Provide clear guidance: Include specific remediation steps, not just problem descriptions
Ownership and automation: Call out auto-assigning issues to code owners, generating fix PRs, and setting automation rules to reduce mean time to remediation (MTTR) and streamline developer workflows.
Developer experience drives adoption. Look for tools with IDE plugins, pre-commit hooks, pull request (PR) checks, auto-fix PRs, just-in-time education, and ownership tagging. These features ensure feedback is timely, actionable, and delivered where developers already work.
Popular automated code review tools
The automated code review tool landscape spans several categories, though many tools now offer overlapping capabilities:
Enterprise platforms: SonarQube, Checkmarx, Veracode, and Fortify provide comprehensive scanning with enterprise features like advanced reporting, compliance mapping, and broad language support.
Integrated development platforms: GitHub Advanced Security and GitLab Ultimate embed SAST, dependency scanning, and secrets detection directly into repositories and CI/CD pipelines.
Specialized open-source tools: ESLint (JavaScript), PMD (Java), Semgrep (multi-language with policy-as-code support), and Bandit (Python) target specific languages or use cases with high customization.
Developer-focused tools: Snyk Code, Codacy, and CodeQL deliver fast feedback within IDEs and pull requests, with auto-fix suggestions for common issues.
Cloud-native security platforms: Newer solutions connect code analysis to runtime cloud risk, enabling context-aware prioritization.
How Wiz Code enables comprehensive shift-left security
Wiz Code transforms automated code review by connecting it to comprehensive cloud security. It scans Infrastructure as Code templates, application dependencies, and source code for vulnerabilities, secrets, and misconfigurations directly in developer workflows.
The platform integrates with IDEs, Git repositories, and CI/CD pipelines to provide security feedback where developers already work. This reduces friction and increases adoption compared to separate security tools.
Wiz Code's unique advantage is its ability to correlate code-level findings with runtime cloud infrastructure. When a vulnerability is detected in a running container or cloud resource, the platform traces back to the specific source code repository, file, and developer responsible, enabling targeted remediation.
Key differentiators:
Code-to-cloud correlation: Connect development findings to actual runtime risks
Unified policy engine: Apply consistent security rules across all environments
Developer guardrails: Prevent issues from reaching production through early detection
Attack path analysis: Show how code vulnerabilities combine with cloud misconfigurations to create real risks
Watch 5-min demo
Watch the demo to learn how Wiz Code scans infrastructure as code, container images, and CI/CD pipelines to catch risks early—before they reach the cloud.
