What is virtualization?
Virtualization is a technology that creates multiple simulated computers on a single physical server. This means you can run several separate operating systems and applications on one machine, each acting like it has its own dedicated hardware.
The hypervisor is the software that makes this possible. It sits between your physical server and the virtual machines, dividing up resources like CPU, memory, and storage. Think of it as a traffic controller that ensures each virtual machine gets what it needs without interfering with others.
There are two main types of hypervisors you'll encounter:
Type 1 (Bare-metal): Runs directly on the server hardware and is more efficient for enterprise use
Type 2 (Hosted): Runs on top of an existing operating system and is easier to set up for development
Each virtual machine includes a complete operating system, which means it uses gigabytes of resources. This creates strong security boundaries since each VM is completely isolated from others. If one VM gets compromised, the others remain safe.
Advanced Container Security [Cheat Sheet]
Go beyond the basics with advanced techniques you can put into action ASAP to secure your container environments.
What is containerization?
Containerization packages an application and everything it needs to run into a lightweight, portable unit called a container. This means your app, its libraries, and dependencies all travel together, but they share the host operating system's kernel instead of needing their own OS.
A container engine like Docker manages these containers on your system. It uses Linux features to keep containers separate and resource-bounded:
Namespaces: Isolate views of processes, networks, mounts, and more so containers don’t see each other’s resources
Control groups (cgroups): Enforce CPU, memory, and I/O limits and accounting per container
Containers start in seconds because they don't need to boot an entire operating system. They're measured in megabytes instead of gigabytes, making them incredibly efficient for running multiple applications on the same server.
Architecture and isolation: How security boundaries differ
The biggest difference between virtualization and containerization is how they create security boundaries. Virtual machines use hardware-level isolation, which means each VM is completely separate from others. The hypervisor acts like a fortress wall between VMs.
Containers use OS-level isolation (namespaces, cgroups) while sharing the host kernel. While namespaces and cgroups create logical boundaries, all containers ultimately depend on the same underlying kernel. This is like having separate apartments in one building versus separate houses.
This architectural difference creates different security risks:
VM isolation: A problem in one VM stays contained within that VM
Container isolation: A kernel vulnerability could potentially affect all containers on the host
The shared kernel boosts efficiency but requires layered controls (e.g., seccomp, AppArmor/SELinux, minimal capabilities) and, for higher isolation, options like gVisor or Kata Containers. You're trading some isolation strength for better performance and resource efficiency.
Container Architecture: A Security Review
Container architecture is a way to package and deploy applications as standardized units called containers.
Read more
Security implications: Attack surface and threat landscape analysis
Containerization's shared kernel creates unique security challenges you need to understand. The biggest risk is container escape, where an attacker breaks out of a container to access the host system or other containers. This happens when someone exploits vulnerabilities in the kernel or container runtime.
Container security also involves managing supply chain and orchestration risks (e.g., image signing/SBOM, registry trust, Kubernetes RBAC/PSA, and network policies). Attackers can exploit poorly configured permissions or network policies to move between containers or escalate their privileges within your environment.
Virtual machines face different security challenges. While VM isolation is stronger, hypervisor vulnerabilities can be catastrophic if exploited. A hypervisor escape attack could compromise the entire host and all VMs running on it, though these attacks are rare and complex.
The key difference is attack surface:
Containers: Shared kernel increases blast-radius risk without proper controls; detection efficacy depends on telemetry depth and context
VMs: Hypervisor isolation reduces blast radius, but hypervisor vulnerabilities can impact all VMs on the host
Context-driven prioritization: Effective risk management means correlating vulnerabilities with exposure, identity permissions, and data sensitivity to focus on real attack paths, not just isolated issues.
Kubernetes Monitoring Tools and Best Practices to Know
Discover essential Kubernetes monitoring tools and best practices to optimize performance, enhance security, and ensure seamless cluster management.
Read more
Performance, scalability, and resource considerations
Containers typically start in sub-second to a few seconds—some research reports ~177 milliseconds—while VMs often take tens of seconds to a few minutes depending on OS and initialization. This speed difference becomes crucial when you're scaling applications up and down based on demand.
Resource utilization tells the same story. You can run many more containers than VMs on the same hardware because containers don't carry the overhead of multiple operating systems. This higher density means better return on your infrastructure investment.
Here's how they compare in practical terms:
Container startup: Seconds to milliseconds
VM startup: Minutes for full OS boot
Memory footprint: Containers are typically far smaller; VMs usually consume significantly more due to full guest OS
Workload density: Hundreds of containers vs. dozens of VMs per host
Virtual machines make sense when you need the isolation or have specific OS requirements. Containers excel when you want maximum efficiency and can work within a shared kernel model.
Use cases: When to choose virtualization vs. containerization
Choosing between these technologies depends on your specific needs and constraints. Many organizations use both, selecting the right tool for each workload.
| Feature | Containers | Virtual Machines |
|---|---|---|
| Isolation | OS-level (namespaces, cgroups) | Hypervisor-level |
| Startup Time | Sub-second to seconds | Tens of seconds to minutes |
| Density | High (hundreds per host) | Lower (dozens per host) |
| OS Flexibility | Same OS family as host | Any OS (Linux, Windows, etc.) |
| Security Controls | Seccomp, AppArmor, gVisor | Hypervisor, VM firewalls |
| Compliance Fit | Needs hardening, CIS Benchmarks | Stronger by default |
| Typical Use Cases | Microservices, CI/CD, ephemeral | Legacy, multi-tenant, mixed OS |
Virtualization ideal scenarios
Virtual machines work best when you need strong isolation or diverse operating systems. Legacy applications often require specific OS versions that VMs can provide without affecting your modern infrastructure.
Multi-tenant environments benefit from VM isolation when you're hosting applications for different customers. The hardware-level separation ensures one tenant can't impact another's performance or security.
You'll also need VMs when running different operating systems on the same hardware. If you need both Windows and Linux applications, VMs are your only practical option.
Containerization optimal workloads
Containers shine in modern, cloud-native development where speed and efficiency matter most. In fact, recent CNCF research shows 80% of organizations now run Kubernetes in production. Microservices architectures rely on containers to break large applications into smaller, independently deployable services.
CI/CD pipelines benefit from container consistency and speed. You can build once and run anywhere, eliminating environment-specific issues that slow down development and deployment.
Ephemeral workloads like batch processing or data analysis jobs are perfect for containers. You can spin them up quickly, complete the work, and tear them down to optimize resource usage.
Implementation challenges and cloud-native best practices
Managing both containers and VMs creates operational complexity that you need to address. Actually, 63.1% of practitioners say complexity is their biggest cloud security headache. Your teams need new skills to handle container orchestration platforms like Kubernetes, which work differently from traditional VM management tools.
Security tool sprawl becomes a major challenge when you're protecting both technologies. Using separate tools for VMs and containers creates visibility gaps and makes it harder to maintain consistent security policies across your environment.
Monitoring and observability require different approaches for dynamic containerized workloads (e.g., short-lived pods), including label-based metrics, distributed tracing, and eBPF-driven runtime telemetry. Traditional monitoring tools struggle with containers that can be created and destroyed in seconds, requiring modern observability platforms that can track ephemeral resources.
Key implementation considerations include:
Skills development: Training teams on container orchestration and cloud-native practices
Tool consolidation: Using unified security platforms that cover both VMs and containers
Policy consistency: Ensuring security and compliance policies work across all workload types
Monitoring strategy: Implementing observability that handles both static and dynamic workloads
Containers vs. Virtual Machines (VMs): The Differences and Which to Choose
Compare containers and virtual machines (VMs) to learn their security, performance, and scalability differences. Find the right approach for your cloud.
Read more
How Wiz secures both containerized and virtualized environments
Securing hybrid environments with both VMs and containers requires a unified approach that understands the unique risks of each technology. Wiz provides agentless visibility across your entire cloud infrastructure, scanning both virtual machines and containers without performance impact.
The Wiz Security Graph connects code, pipeline, cloud, and runtime, revealing how a container vulnerability, identity misconfiguration, and public exposure combine into an attack path—and how to break it. Wiz surfaces toxic combinations and prioritizes them with shared context, then routes fixes to the right owners in dev, platform, or cloud teams.
Ready to gain complete visibility across your hybrid cloud infrastructure and identify attack paths before they're exploited? Get a demo and see how Wiz's unified approach secures both containers and VMs.
