Protecting endpoints has always been a cornerstone of enterprise security — and it’s more important than ever with the rise of remote work and distributed IT environments. Laptops, servers, and other devices remain prime targets for attackers, making endpoint detection and response (EDR) platforms critical for modern security teams.
At the same time, the line between endpoints and the cloud is blurring. Leading EDR platforms now extend into workloads and cloud services, giving organizations broader visibility and protection beyond the device layer.
That’s where Microsoft Defender and CrowdStrike Falcon come in. Both are leaders in endpoint security, and both have expanded their capabilities into the cloud. But their approaches differ: Defender leverages deep integration with the Microsoft ecosystem, while Falcon takes a cloud-native, cross-platform path.
In this post, we’ll walk through the features, benefits, and trade-offs of each solution so you can decide which aligns best with your organization’s infrastructure and security strategy.
The Board-Ready CISO Report Deck [Template]
This editable template helps you communicate risk, impact, and priorities in language your board will understand—so you can gain buy-in and drive action.
What is Microsoft Defender?
Microsoft Defender is Microsoft’s endpoint security platform, delivered as part of the broader Microsoft 365 Defender suite. It provides endpoint detection and response (EDR), next-generation antivirus, vulnerability management, and threat intelligence – all tightly integrated with Microsoft 365 Defender and the broader Microsoft ecosystem.
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint primarily uses an agent across Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, and Android devices. For cloud and hybrid environments, Microsoft Defender for Cloud extends visibility and protection with cloud-native controls and agentless options, enabling organizations to secure both traditional endpoints and cloud workloads.
Key features include:
Endpoint detection and response (EDR)
Next-generation antivirus (NGAV)
Vulnerability management and threat intelligence
Automated investigation and remediation
Machine learning and behavioral analysis
ATT&CK-aligned detections and threat hunting, plus compliance reporting through Microsoft 365 compliance tools (such as ISO 27001 mappings)
In practice, Microsoft Defender is especially attractive for organizations already invested in Microsoft 365 or Azure, since it reduces licensing costs and simplifies deployment across a familiar ecosystem.
What is CrowdStrike Falcon?
CrowdStrike is a cybersecurity company ecognized for its endpoint detection and response (EDR) capabilities. Its flagship platform, CrowdStrike Falcon, was designed as a cloud-native security architecture that uses a lightweight agent to provide deep visibility into endpoint and workload activity.
Over time, CrowdStrike has expanded beyond endpoints into broader security coverage, including cloud workload protection, threat intelligence, and managed detection and response. The Falcon platform is backed by the CrowdStrike Threat Graph, which ingests and analyzes massive volumes of security events, enabling real-time detection, hunting, and response.
Key features include:
Lightweight agent-based protection for endpoints, workloads, and cloud assets
AI-powered threat detection and response with real-time visibility
Cloud workload protection for VMs, containers, and services
Integrated threat intelligence and proactive threat hunting
Incident response and forensics capabilities
CrowdStrike remains a strong option for enterprises with diverse endpoint environments or those that need advanced detection and threat hunting services, though organizations may layer it with other platforms to gain deeper context into identities, data, and multi-cloud security.
CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Microsoft Defender: How do they stack up head to head?
When comparing Microsoft Defender and CrowdStrike Falcon, the right choice often comes down to your environment, existing investments, and operational priorities. Both offer strong endpoint protection, but they emphasize different strengths.
Deployment speed & operational complexity
Microsoft Defender: Integrated into the Windows ecosystem, Defender is straightforward for organizations already running Microsoft 365. However, configuration across hybrid or multi-cloud environments can be more involved.
CrowdStrike Falcon: Built on a cloud-native architecture, Falcon’s lightweight agent supports deployment across diverse environments with a lightweight architecture designed to reduce performance impact.
Takeaway: CrowdStrike emphasizes ease of deployment across heterogeneous environments, while Microsoft offers straightforward integration for Windows-centric setups.
Multi-cloud & cross-platform coverage
Microsoft Defender: Optimized for Azure and Windows environments, but also extends support to AWS, GCP, and non-Windows devices.
CrowdStrike Falcon: Built as a cloud-native platform supporting cross-platform protection, covering Windows, macOS, Linux, and major public cloud providers.
Takeaway: CrowdStrike Falcon focuses on multi-cloud and cross-platform coverage, while Microsoft Defender aligns closely with Azure-first environments.
Detection effectiveness & threat response
Microsoft Defender: Leverages Windows telemetry and automation to detect and remediate threats, particularly effective in Microsoft-heavy stacks.
CrowdStrike Falcon: Offers EDR capabilities with a focus on proactive threat hunting and incident response.
Takeaway: Both platforms perform strongly according to independent testing organizations such as AV-Test and MITRE ATT&CK evaluations, with Microsoft Defender leveraging Windows telemetry and automation.
Total cost of ownership
Microsoft Defender: May reduce licensing overhead for organizations already licensed under Microsoft 365 E5, though additional costs such as log ingestion may apply
CrowdStrike Falcon: Uses a per-endpoint pricing model that scales predictably based on usage.
Takeaway: Organizations with existing Microsoft 365 E5 licenses may find Defender more cost-aligned, while those preferring per-endpoint or usage-based pricing may consider CrowdStrike Falcon.
Integration & ecosystem support
Microsoft Defender: Deep integration with the Microsoft ecosystem (e.g., 365, Sentinel, Azure) is helpful in Microsoft-heavy environments.
CrowdStrike Falcon: Offers broad third-party integrations, including SIEMs, SOAR tools, and DevSecOps workflows, for flexible interoperability.
Takeaway: Microsoft Defender in Microsoft-centric environments; CrowdStrike for heterogeneous toolchains.
Compliance & governance
Microsoft Defender: Strong compliance alignment with Microsoft cloud certifications and built-in reporting for regulated industries.
CrowdStrike Falcon: Provides governance features with wide regulatory framework support, particularly valued in global, multi-cloud enterprises.
Takeaway: Microsoft Defender in Azure-first, regulated industries; CrowdStrike Falcon for multi-cloud enterprises with diverse compliance needs.
Top CrowdStrike Alternatives & Competitors in 2025
This guide provides a straightforward comparison between CrowdStrike’s security offerings and other cybersecurity tools in the marketplace.
Read more
Bottom line: Which platform is best for your organization?
Both Microsoft Defender and CrowdStrike Falcon are strong endpoint security platforms, but the better fit depends on your organization’s environment and priorities.
Microsoft Defender typically aligns with organizations that:
• Are invested in Microsoft 365 or Azure ecosystems
• Seek to consolidate security tools under existing licensing
• Operate primarily within Windows or Azure environmentsCrowdStrike Falcon typically aligns with organizations that:
• Operate multi-cloud or mixed-OS environments
• Value agent-based protection with flexible integration options
• Require managed detection and response capabilities across endpoints
Ultimately, the choice isn’t about which platform is ‘better,’ but which aligns best with your technology stack, licensing, and security strategy. Whichever EDR/XDR you choose, pair it with a cloud-native risk platform to correlate endpoint signals with cloud misconfigurations, identities, data exposure, and runtime context.
Securing modern cloud environments with Wiz
Enterprise security is no longer just about protecting endpoints. With cloud adoption accelerating and workloads becoming more distributed, organizations now need visibility and protection that span endpoints, cloud infrastructure, identities, data, and applications. Endpoint platforms like Microsoft Defender and CrowdStrike Falcon have added some cloud capabilities, but the growing complexity of modern environments calls for a more unified approach.
That’s where a cloud-native application protection platform (CNAPP) like Wiz comes in. Wiz was designed for cloud environments, providing agentless coverage across multi-cloud environments through automated discovery. Its Security Graph correlates misconfigurations, vulnerabilities, identity risks, and data exposure to help visualize potential attack paths and prioritize the issues that matter most.
runtime detections, a CNAPP helps simplify the security stack and reduce alert noise with risk-based prioritization.
Learn how Wiz complements endpoint tools by providing unified visibility across your cloud environment. Explore how it visualizes attack paths with risk-based prioritization.
Ready to see how Wiz can complement your endpoint tools with unified visibility across your cloud? Request a demo to visualize attack paths, reduce noise, and secure your environment from code to runtime.
See Wiz Cloud in Action
In your 10 minute interactive guided tour, you will:
Get instant access to the Wiz platform walkthrough
Experience how Wiz prioritizes critical risks
See the remediation steps involved with specific examples
