CVE-2025-69421: 
OpenSSL vulnerability analysis and mitigation

Overview

CVE-2025-69421 is a NULL pointer dereference vulnerability in OpenSSL's PKCS12_item_decrypt_d2i_ex() function that can be triggered by processing a malformed PKCS#12 file, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS). It was disclosed on January 27, 2026, and affects OpenSSL versions 1.0.2 (before 1.0.2zn), 1.1.1 (before 1.1.1ze), 3.0.x (before 3.0.19), 3.3.x (before 3.3.6), 3.4.x (before 3.4.4), 3.5.x (before 3.5.5), and 3.6.x (before 3.6.1). The vulnerability carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.5 (High) per Feedly intelligence data, though OpenSSL's own security policy assessed it as Low severity due to the requirement for attacker-supplied input. FIPS modules across all affected branches are not impacted (OpenSSL Advisory, Red Hat CVE).

Technical details

The root cause is a missing NULL check (CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference) in PKCS12_item_decrypt_d2i_ex() within crypto/pkcs12/p12_decr.c. When this function is called from PKCS12_unpack_p7encdata() during processing of a malformed PKCS#12 file, the oct parameter can be NULL; the function then attempts to dereference oct->data and oct->length without first validating the pointer, causing a crash. The fix, applied across all affected branches, adds a simple NULL guard that raises ERR_R_PASSED_NULL_PARAMETER and returns NULL before any dereference occurs. Exploitation requires an attacker to supply a crafted PKCS#12 file to an application that parses it — no authentication or special privileges are needed on the network path, but the application must accept externally provided PKCS#12 input (OpenSSL Commit, OpenSSL Advisory).

Impact

Successful exploitation causes the affected application to crash, resulting in a Denial of Service condition. The impact is strictly limited to availability — the vulnerability cannot be escalated to achieve remote code execution or memory disclosure, and there is no confidentiality or integrity impact. Applications that accept PKCS#12 files from untrusted sources (e.g., TLS certificate management tools, VPN clients, web servers processing client certificates) are most at risk of service disruption (OpenSSL Advisory, Red Hat CVE).

Exploitability

There is no public proof-of-concept exploit and no evidence of in-the-wild exploitation as of the time of reporting. The EPSS score is approximately 0.025% (0.000250), reflecting very low probability of exploitation in the near term. The vulnerability is not listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog. No threat actor attribution has been reported. The vulnerability was notably discovered as part of a batch of 12 OpenSSL vulnerabilities identified with AI-assisted security research by the Aisle team, which received attention in the security community (Aisle Blog, OpenSSL Advisory).

Exploitation steps

  1. Identify a target application: Locate an application that processes PKCS#12 files using a vulnerable version of OpenSSL (1.0.2 before 1.0.2zn, 1.1.1 before 1.1.1ze, 3.0.x before 3.0.19, 3.3.x before 3.3.6, 3.4.x before 3.4.4, 3.5.x before 3.5.5, or 3.6.x before 3.6.1). Examples include certificate import utilities, VPN clients, or web servers accepting client certificate uploads.
  2. Craft a malformed PKCS#12 file: Create a PKCS#12 file with a malformed or missing encrypted data field in the ContentInfo structure such that when PKCS12_unpack_p7encdata() calls PKCS12_item_decrypt_d2i_ex(), the oct (octet string) parameter resolves to NULL.
  3. Submit the malformed file: Provide the crafted PKCS#12 file to the target application through whatever input mechanism it exposes — file upload, API endpoint, or command-line argument.
  4. Trigger the crash: The application calls PKCS12_item_decrypt_d2i_ex(), which dereferences the NULL oct pointer, causing a segmentation fault and crashing the process, resulting in a Denial of Service (OpenSSL Advisory, OpenSSL Commit).

Indicators of compromise

  • Logs: Application crash logs or core dumps referencing a segmentation fault or NULL pointer dereference in PKCS12_item_decrypt_d2i_ex() or PKCS12_unpack_p7encdata() within the OpenSSL library; OpenSSL error log entries containing ERR_R_PASSED_NULL_PARAMETER from ERR_LIB_PKCS12 (on patched versions that gracefully handle the condition).
  • Process: Unexpected termination (crash) of processes that handle PKCS#12 file parsing, such as certificate management daemons, VPN services, or web server worker processes.
  • File System: Presence of core dump files (e.g., core, core.<pid>) in application working directories following processing of externally supplied PKCS#12 files; unusual or malformed .p12 or .pfx files submitted to the application.
  • Network: Repeated connection attempts or file submissions to PKCS#12-processing endpoints followed by service unavailability, potentially indicating repeated DoS attempts.

Mitigation and workarounds

Update OpenSSL to a patched version appropriate for your deployment branch: 1.0.2zn or later, 1.1.1ze or later, 3.0.19 or later, 3.3.6 or later, 3.4.4 or later, 3.5.5 or later, or 3.6.1 or later. Patches are available via the OpenSSL GitHub repository across multiple branches. For organizations unable to patch immediately, restrict which systems and users can submit PKCS#12 files for processing, and implement input validation to reject malformed PKCS#12 files before they reach the vulnerable code path. Downstream products from IBM (InfoSphere Information Server, API Connect, Netezza Appliance, watsonx Orchestrate), Dell, Red Hat, FreeBSD, Debian, Ubuntu, SUSE, Alpine, and others have also released or are releasing updated packages (OpenSSL Advisory, Red Hat CVE, IBM Advisory).

Community reactions

The vulnerability was part of a batch of 12 OpenSSL security issues disclosed on January 27, 2026, several of which attracted significant media attention. The Aisle security team, which used AI-assisted methods to discover all 12 vulnerabilities, was publicly praised for the high quality of their reports and constructive collaboration with the OpenSSL project (Aisle Blog, Tom's Hardware). Coverage from outlets including Heise, TechRadar, and CyberSecurityNews highlighted the broader batch disclosure, though CVE-2025-69421 itself was noted as a lower-severity DoS issue compared to other CVEs in the same release. The OpenSSL project discussed the release on its official mailing lists (OpenSSL Users List).

Additional resources

Linux Distribution fix status

Fix availability across major Linux distributions and their releases.

Debian

Fixed

bookworm

openssl: 3.0.18-1~deb12u2

Fixed

sid

openssl: 3.5.5-1

Fixed

trixie

openssl: 3.5.4-1~deb13u2

Fixed

Ubuntu

Fixed

bionic (esm-apps)

nodejs

Unknown

bionic (esm-infra)

openssl: 1.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.23+esm7

Fixed

bionic (fips-updates)

openssl: 1.1.1-1ubuntu2.fips.2.1~18.04.23.7

Fixed

bionic (fips)

openssl

Affected

devel

openssl: 3.5.5-1ubuntu1

Fixed

focal (esm-apps)

nodejs

Not Affected

focal (esm-infra)

openssl: 1.1.1f-1ubuntu2.24+esm2

Fixed

focal (fips-updates)

openssl: 1.1.1f-1ubuntu2.fips.24.2

Fixed

RHEL / CentOS

Fixed

OpenShift

openshift/ose-rhel-coreos-8

Affected

RHEL 8

compat-openssl10.src

Affected

RHEL 9

:appstream:compat-openssl11/openssl-perl-1:3.5.1-7.el9_7

Fixed

RHEL 10

openssl-1:3.5.1-7.el10_1.src

Fixed

Alpine

Fixed

edge

openssl: 3.5.5-r0

Fixed

v3.20

openssl: 3.3.6-r0

Fixed

v3.21

openssl: 3.3.6-r0

Fixed

v3.22

openssl: 3.5.5-r0

Fixed

v3.23

openssl: 3.5.5-r0

Fixed

Source: This report was generated using AI

Related OpenSSL vulnerabilities:

CVE ID

Severity

Score

Technologies

Component name

CISA KEV exploit

Has fix

Published date

CVE-2026-84782HIGH8.2
  • Ruby logoRuby
  • samba-dc-libs
NoYesSep 29, 2026
CVE-2026-84784HIGH7.5
  • OpenSSL logoOpenSSL
  • libopenssl-3-fips-provider
NoYesSep 29, 2026
CVE-2026-84783HIGH7.5
  • OpenSSL logoOpenSSL
  • AAVMF
NoYesSep 29, 2026
CVE-2026-75806MEDIUM5.3
  • OpenSSL logoOpenSSL
  • edk2-hwe
NoYesSep 29, 2026
CVE-2026-77696LOW3.7
  • OpenSSL logoOpenSSL
  • libopenssl-3-fips-provider
NoYesSep 29, 2026

Free Vulnerability Assessment

Benchmark your Cloud Security Posture

Evaluate your cloud security practices across 9 security domains to benchmark your risk level and identify gaps in your defenses.

Request assessment

Additional Wiz resources

Get a personalized demo

Ready to see Wiz in action?

"Best User Experience I have ever seen, provides full visibility to cloud workloads."
David EstlickCISO
"Wiz provides a single pane of glass to see what is going on in our cloud environments."
Adam FletcherChief Security Officer
"We know that if Wiz identifies something as critical, it actually is."
Greg PoniatowskiHead of Threat and Vulnerability Management