CVE-2026-11710: 
IBM WebSphere Application Server vulnerability analysis and mitigation

Overview

CVE-2026-11710 is an HTTP request smuggling vulnerability in IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) 8.5, caused by improper handling of Content-Length headers. It was published on September 18, 2026, and is classified under CWE-444 (Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests). The vulnerability carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 6.5 (Medium) (GitHub Advisory, IBM Advisory).

Technical details

The root cause is improper handling of Content-Length headers in IBM WebSphere Application Server 8.5, classified as CWE-444 (HTTP Request Smuggling / CAPEC-33). An unauthenticated remote attacker can craft malicious HTTP requests that exploit inconsistencies in how the WAS intermediary and backend servers parse Content-Length values, causing the backend to interpret smuggled request boundaries differently than the front-end proxy. This allows the attacker to inject or prepend content to subsequent requests processed by the server, potentially bypassing security controls. No public proof-of-concept code has been identified at this time (GitHub Advisory, IBM Advisory).

Impact

Successful exploitation could allow an unauthenticated network attacker to bypass authentication and authorization controls, access sensitive data (high confidentiality impact), and perform limited data modification (low integrity impact). Availability is not directly affected. In multi-tier deployments where WAS acts as an intermediary, smuggled requests could be used to poison shared connection queues, potentially affecting other users' sessions or enabling further lateral movement within the application environment (GitHub Advisory, Feedly).

Exploitability

There is no evidence of active in-the-wild exploitation or a publicly available proof-of-concept as of the time of reporting. The NVD SSVC assessment indicates exploitation is "none" and the attack is not automatable, reflecting the high attack complexity required. The EPSS score is approximately 0.228% (12th percentile), indicating a low near-term exploitation probability. The vulnerability is not listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog (GitHub Advisory, IBM Advisory).

Exploitation steps

  1. Reconnaissance: Identify internet-facing IBM WebSphere Application Server 8.5 instances, particularly those deployed behind a reverse proxy or load balancer, using tools like Shodan or Censys.
  2. Craft smuggled request: Construct a malformed HTTP request that includes conflicting or ambiguous Content-Length header values designed to exploit the inconsistency between how WAS and the backend/frontend parse the request boundary.
  3. Send the request: Transmit the crafted HTTP request to the target WAS 8.5 endpoint over the network (no authentication required).
  4. Smuggle secondary request: The malformed request causes the server to interpret a smuggled secondary request, which may be prepended to the next legitimate user's request, potentially bypassing authentication checks or injecting malicious content into the request pipeline.
  5. Achieve objective: Depending on the deployment, the attacker may access restricted resources, exfiltrate sensitive data, or manipulate application logic by exploiting the smuggled request context (GitHub Advisory, IBM Advisory).

Indicators of compromise

  • Network: Unusual HTTP requests with duplicate, conflicting, or malformed Content-Length headers targeting WAS 8.5 endpoints; unexpected HTTP/1.1 keep-alive connections with anomalous body lengths.
  • Logs: WAS access logs showing requests with inconsistent Content-Length values or unexpected HTTP parsing errors; log entries where a single connection appears to generate multiple distinct server-side requests.
  • Application Behavior: Unexpected access to restricted resources or endpoints without corresponding authentication events; users reporting session contamination or receiving responses intended for other users.

Mitigation and workarounds

IBM has released a security patch addressing this vulnerability, referenced in the IBM support page (node/7286731); administrators should apply this patch immediately (IBM Advisory). As a workaround, organizations should implement strict HTTP request validation and Content-Length header verification at the network perimeter or via a Web Application Firewall (WAF) to detect and block malformed requests. Disabling HTTP/1.1 keep-alive connections or enforcing strict request parsing at the proxy layer can also reduce exposure (GitHub Advisory).

Community reactions

IBM published a security bulletin specifically addressing WAS shipped with Jazz Service Management (JazzSM), indicating the vulnerability has broader product impact beyond standalone WAS deployments (IBM JazzSM Bulletin). Coverage has been limited to automated vulnerability tracking platforms and IBM's own advisory channels, with no notable independent researcher commentary or significant social media discussion identified at this time.

Additional resources


Source: This report was generated using AI

Related IBM WebSphere Application Server vulnerabilities:

CVE ID

Severity

Score

Technologies

Component name

CISA KEV exploit

Has fix

Published date

CVE-2026-11711MEDIUM6.5
  • IBM WebSphere Application Server logoIBM WebSphere Application Server
  • cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server
NoYesSep 18, 2026
CVE-2026-11710MEDIUM6.5
  • IBM WebSphere Application Server logoIBM WebSphere Application Server
  • cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server
NoYesSep 18, 2026
CVE-2026-11540MEDIUM5.3
  • IBM WebSphere Application Server logoIBM WebSphere Application Server
  • cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server
NoYesSep 18, 2026
CVE-2026-11539MEDIUM5.3
  • IBM WebSphere Application Server logoIBM WebSphere Application Server
  • cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server
NoYesSep 18, 2026
CVE-2026-11545LOW3.7
  • IBM WebSphere Application Server logoIBM WebSphere Application Server
  • cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server
NoYesSep 18, 2026

Free Vulnerability Assessment

Benchmark your Cloud Security Posture

Evaluate your cloud security practices across 9 security domains to benchmark your risk level and identify gaps in your defenses.

Request assessment

Get a personalized demo

Ready to see Wiz in action?

"Best User Experience I have ever seen, provides full visibility to cloud workloads."
David EstlickCISO
"Wiz provides a single pane of glass to see what is going on in our cloud environments."
Adam FletcherChief Security Officer
"We know that if Wiz identifies something as critical, it actually is."
Greg PoniatowskiHead of Threat and Vulnerability Management