
Cloud Vulnerability DB
A community-led vulnerabilities database
CVE-2026-24470 is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Zalando Skipper, an HTTP router and reverse proxy used as a Kubernetes Ingress controller. When running as an Ingress controller, users with permissions to create an Ingress resource and a Kubernetes Service of type ExternalName can craft routes that abuse Skipper's network access to reach internal services that should otherwise be inaccessible. All versions of Skipper prior to 0.24.0 are affected. The vulnerability was published on January 26, 2026, and carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 8.1 (High) (GitHub Advisory, Skipper Security Advisory).
The root cause is classified as CWE-918 (Server-Side Request Forgery) and CWE-441 (Unintended Proxy or Intermediary / 'Confused Deputy'). Prior to version 0.24.0, Skipper's Kubernetes data client unconditionally honored ExternalName-type Services as Ingress backends without validating or restricting the target hostname. An attacker with low-privilege Kubernetes RBAC permissions (specifically, the ability to create Ingress and Service resources) could define a Service of type ExternalName pointing to an internal cluster address (e.g., the Kubernetes API server or other internal microservices) and then create an Ingress route that causes Skipper to proxy traffic to that internal target. The fix in commit a4c87ce introduces a new EnableExternalNames flag (defaulting to false) that disables ExternalName backend support unless explicitly re-enabled (GitHub Commit, GitHub Advisory).
Successful exploitation allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes network segmentation and use Skipper as a proxy to reach internal services that are not exposed externally, including cluster-internal APIs, metadata services, or other microservices. This results in high confidentiality impact (unauthorized access to sensitive internal data) and high integrity impact (potential to interact with and modify internal services), with no direct availability impact. The vulnerability enables lateral movement within the cluster and could facilitate further compromise of internal infrastructure (GitHub Advisory, Feedly).
Exploitation requires low privileges — specifically, Kubernetes RBAC permissions to create Ingress and Service resources — and no user interaction. There is no public proof-of-concept exploit and no evidence of in-the-wild exploitation at this time. The EPSS score is approximately 0.022–0.044%, placing it in the 14th percentile for exploitation likelihood. The vulnerability is not listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog (GitHub Advisory, Feedly).
Ingress and Service resources in at least one namespace.ExternalName with the externalName field pointing to an internal target (e.g., kubernetes.default.svc.cluster.local for the Kubernetes API server, or another internal microservice hostname).apiVersion: v1
kind: Service
metadata:
name: internal-pivot
spec:
type: ExternalName
externalName: kubernetes.default.svc.cluster.localService resources of type ExternalName by non-administrative users, especially with externalName values pointing to internal cluster DNS names (e.g., *.svc.cluster.local, 169.254.169.254, or RFC-1918 addresses).Ingress resources referencing the above ExternalName Services by the same low-privilege account.externalNameRoute or related log messages in Skipper's output.Upgrade Skipper to version 0.24.0 or later, which disables Kubernetes ExternalName service support by default. For deployments that legitimately require ExternalName services, re-enable the feature explicitly with -enable-kubernetes-external-names and restrict allowed targets using -kubernetes-only-allowed-external-names=true combined with -kubernetes-allowed-external-name '^[a-z][a-z0-9-.]+[.].allowed.example$' (substituting your approved domain pattern). As an organizational control, restrict Kubernetes RBAC permissions to create Ingress and Service resources to trusted administrators only, reducing the attack surface regardless of Skipper version (GitHub Advisory, GitHub Commit).
The vulnerability was reported by security researchers identified as b0b0haha, moyushui, and j311yl0v3u via the GitHub Advisory Database. Brief mentions appeared on Mastodon and Bluesky via TheHackerWire shortly after disclosure. Red Hat also tracked the vulnerability for its products. Overall community reaction has been limited, consistent with the niche scope of the affected software and the absence of a public exploit (GitHub Advisory).
Source: This report was generated using AI
Free Vulnerability Assessment
Evaluate your cloud security practices across 9 security domains to benchmark your risk level and identify gaps in your defenses.
Get a personalized demo
"Best User Experience I have ever seen, provides full visibility to cloud workloads."
"Wiz provides a single pane of glass to see what is going on in our cloud environments."
"We know that if Wiz identifies something as critical, it actually is."