
Cloud Vulnerability DB
A community-led vulnerabilities database
CVE-2026-33252 is a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Model Context Protocol (MCP) Go SDK (github.com/modelcontextprotocol/go-sdk) that enables cross-site tool execution against HTTP servers without authorization. The vulnerability affects all versions up to and including v1.4.0 of the Go SDK. It was reported by Lê Minh Quân (GitHub: aleister1102), published on March 18, 2026, and patched in v1.4.1. It carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.1 (High) (GitHub Advisory, MCP Go SDK Advisory).
The root cause is classified as CWE-352 (Cross-Site Request Forgery) and CWE-940 (Improper Verification of Source of a Communication Channel). The Go SDK's Streamable HTTP transport failed to validate the Origin header on incoming POST requests and did not enforce Content-Type: application/json. Because Content-Type: text/plain is a CORS-safelisted header value, browsers will send such requests cross-origin without triggering a CORS preflight check, allowing a malicious website to deliver MCP protocol messages directly to a locally running MCP server. The attack is particularly effective against stateless or sessionless server deployments that lack an Authorization header requirement. The fix in commit a433a83 introduced http.CrossOriginProtection (available in Go 1.25+) and enforces Content-Type: application/json validation on all POST requests (GitHub Advisory, Patch Commit).
Successful exploitation allows an arbitrary malicious website to send crafted MCP requests to a locally running MCP server on behalf of a victim user, potentially triggering arbitrary tool execution registered with that server. The primary impact is a high integrity loss — an attacker can cause the MCP server to execute tools or actions it would not otherwise perform — with low availability impact and no direct confidentiality impact per the CVSS scoring. The risk is highest in developer environments or local deployments where MCP servers run without authorization controls, as these are the configurations most susceptible to cross-site tool invocation (GitHub Advisory, Red Hat Bugzilla).
No public proof-of-concept exploit code or in-the-wild exploitation has been reported for this vulnerability. The EPSS score is approximately 0.009% (1st percentile), indicating a low near-term exploitation probability. The vulnerability is not listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog. Exploitation requires user interaction — a victim must visit a malicious website while a vulnerable, authorization-free MCP server is running locally — which limits the practical attack surface (GitHub Advisory).
Authorization header requirement, typically on localhost (e.g., http://localhost:PORT/mcp).Content-Type: text/plain (a CORS-safelisted content type that bypasses preflight checks).Content-Type or Origin, the message is accepted and processed.http://localhost:<PORT>/mcp) originating from browser processes with Content-Type: text/plain or missing Content-Type: application/json; Origin header in requests pointing to an external or unknown domain.Content-Type: text/plain that were processed successfully (pre-patch); requests from Origin values that do not match expected client origins.Users should upgrade to github.com/modelcontextprotocol/go-sdk v1.4.1, which enforces Content-Type: application/json validation on POST requests and enables cross-origin protection via http.CrossOriginProtection. Note that v1.4.1 requires Go 1.25 or later. As a temporary workaround for deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, adding an Authorization requirement to the MCP server will prevent unauthenticated cross-site requests from being processed. The disablecrossoriginprotection MCPGODEBUG option can be used to temporarily revert the new protection behavior, but this is not recommended for production use and will be removed in v1.6.0 (GitHub Advisory, Patch Commit).
The vulnerability was disclosed via the GitHub Security Advisory program and tracked by Red Hat's Product Security team in Bugzilla, indicating it received attention from enterprise Linux distribution maintainers. SUSE also issued a security announcement referencing the vulnerability. Community discussion was limited, with a Bluesky post from a cybersecurity blog noting the advisory. No significant researcher commentary or media coverage beyond standard vulnerability tracking was identified (Red Hat Bugzilla, GitHub Advisory).
Fix availability across major Linux distributions and their releases.
Source: This report was generated using AI
Free Vulnerability Assessment
Evaluate your cloud security practices across 9 security domains to benchmark your risk level and identify gaps in your defenses.
Get a personalized demo
"Best User Experience I have ever seen, provides full visibility to cloud workloads."
"Wiz provides a single pane of glass to see what is going on in our cloud environments."
"We know that if Wiz identifies something as critical, it actually is."