
Cloud Vulnerability DB
A community-led vulnerabilities database
CVE-2026-63452 is a denial-of-service vulnerability in Suricata's HTTP/1 parser caused by improper handling of repeated brotli compression bombs within a single network flow. Affecting Suricata versions 8.0.0 through 8.0.5, the flaw allows unauthenticated remote attackers to exhaust CPU resources and degrade or disable packet processing and network security monitoring. The vulnerability was discovered by OSS-Fuzz, published on September 18, 2026, and fixed in Suricata 8.0.6. It carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.5 (High) (GitHub Advisory, Red Hat Bugzilla).
The root cause is uncontrolled resource consumption (CWE-400) combined with improper handling of highly compressed data (CWE-409). Suricata's HTTP/1 parser, implemented via the rust/htp library, limits decompression work on a per-transaction basis but lacks a per-flow limit on the total number of brotli compression bomb events. When response-body-decompress-layer-limit is enabled, an attacker can craft a single HTTP/1 flow containing many small brotli compression bombs; each transaction triggers expensive decompression work in the Rust HTP decompressor, cumulatively consuming excessive CPU. The fix introduces a configurable compression-bomb-count limit (defaulting to 3) tracked per ConnectionParser instance, after which decompression is skipped for the remainder of the flow and a COMPRESSION_BOMB_LIMIT_REACHED log event is emitted (GitHub Advisory, Commit 392b6ae).
Successful exploitation degrades Suricata's packet processing performance, potentially causing complete loss of network security monitoring visibility or a denial-of-service condition for the IDS/IPS/NSM engine. There is no confidentiality or integrity impact — the attack exclusively targets availability. Because Suricata is a security monitoring component, its disruption could allow malicious traffic to pass undetected, indirectly enabling further attacks on monitored networks (GitHub Advisory, Red Hat Bugzilla).
No public proof-of-concept exploit code or in-the-wild exploitation has been reported for CVE-2026-63452. The vulnerability is automatable (no user interaction or privileges required) and exploitable over the network with low attack complexity, making it straightforward for any network-adjacent attacker to trigger. The EPSS score is approximately 0.36%, indicating a low current probability of exploitation. The vulnerability is not listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (GitHub Advisory, Feedly).
response-body-decompress-layer-limit enabled (the default configuration).COMPRESSION_BOMB or COMPRESSION_BOMB_LIMIT_REACHED HTP log codes for the same flow; repeated compression_bomb_limit reached error messages in suricata.log or eve.json from a single source IP or flow.sid:2221059 firing — alert http any any -> any any (msg:"SURICATA HTTP compression bomb limit reached"; flow:established; app-layer-event:http.compression_bomb_limit_reached; ...) — indicates the threshold was reached on a flow (available in patched versions) (Commit 392b6ae).Upgrade Suricata to version 8.0.6, which introduces a per-flow compression bomb count limit (default: 3) and skips further decompression once the threshold is reached. If immediate patching is not possible, two workarounds are available: (1) disable HTTP body decompression entirely by setting app-layer.protocols.http.libhtp.default-config.response-body-decompress-layer-limit: 0 in suricata.yaml; or (2) deploy a Suricata rule to drop and bypass flows triggering the compression bomb event: drop http any any -> any any (msg:"SURICATA HTTP compression bomb"; flow:established; app-layer-event:http.compression_bomb; sid:1; bypass;). Additionally, network-level rate limiting on compressed HTTP responses from untrusted sources can reduce exposure (GitHub Advisory, Suricata 8.0.6 Release).
The vulnerability was credited to OSS-Fuzz, reflecting the ongoing value of automated fuzzing in discovering security issues in network security tooling. Red Hat tracked the issue via Bugzilla with high severity and priority. A Mastodon post referencing the advisory was observed in the community shortly after disclosure. No significant broader media coverage or notable researcher commentary beyond standard vulnerability tracking has been identified (GitHub Advisory, Red Hat Bugzilla).
Fix availability across major Linux distributions and their releases.
Source: This report was generated using AI
Free Vulnerability Assessment
Evaluate your cloud security practices across 9 security domains to benchmark your risk level and identify gaps in your defenses.
Get a personalized demo
"Best User Experience I have ever seen, provides full visibility to cloud workloads."
"Wiz provides a single pane of glass to see what is going on in our cloud environments."
"We know that if Wiz identifies something as critical, it actually is."