
Cloud Vulnerability DB
A community-led vulnerabilities database
CVE-2026-73507 is a Denial of Service vulnerability in Netty's XmlFrameDecoder caused by CPU exhaustion via malformed XML input. The io.netty.handler.codec.xml.XmlFrameDecoder.decode() method failed to preserve closing-tag parser state across invocations, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to trickle-feed repeated </ sequences that caused repeated rescanning of the accumulated buffer, exhausting an EventLoop thread's CPU. Affected versions include all Netty releases prior to 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.0.Final through 4.2.15.Final. The vulnerability was published on August 13, 2026, and carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.5 (High) (GitHub Advisory).
The root cause is uncontrolled resource consumption (CWE-400) in XmlFrameDecoder.decode(). Because the decoder did not track a "pending closing tag" state between successive decode() calls, each new </ sequence in the input caused the decoder to rescan the entire accumulated buffer from the beginning to locate the closing > character. An attacker exploiting this flaw sends a stream of repeated </ byte sequences (trickle-feeding) over a network connection, causing the EventLoop thread to spend unbounded CPU time rescanning a buffer that can grow up to the configured maxFrameLength (default 1 MB). No authentication or special privileges are required. The fix, committed in commit 5b68c61 and commit bb2ff68, tracks the pending closing-tag state in the main decode loop and rejects nested < characters before the closing tag terminator, causing malformed repeated closing tags to fail fast.
Successful exploitation causes a Denial of Service by exhausting the CPU of a Netty EventLoop thread, rendering the affected service unresponsive to legitimate clients. Because Netty's event-driven model relies on a small pool of EventLoop threads to handle all I/O, blocking a single thread with CPU-intensive parsing can degrade or halt processing for all connections handled by that thread. There is no confidentiality or integrity impact — the vulnerability is purely an availability issue affecting any application that uses Netty's XmlFrameDecoder to process untrusted XML input over the network (GitHub Advisory).
No public proof-of-concept exploit code or in-the-wild exploitation has been reported as of the time of publication. The NVD SSVC assessment classifies exploitation as "none" and the attack as "automatable," meaning it can be scripted without human interaction. The EPSS score is approximately 0.0046 (0.46%), indicating a low near-term probability of exploitation. The vulnerability is not listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog. Exploitation requires only network access and no credentials, making it low-complexity for any attacker who can reach a service using the vulnerable XmlFrameDecoder (GitHub Advisory).
XmlFrameDecoder (e.g., custom XML-over-TCP services, messaging middleware built on Netty) that are reachable over the network and running a vulnerable version (< 4.1.136.Final or 4.2.0.Final–4.2.15.Final).XmlFrameDecoder for framing incoming XML data.</ byte sequences without ever completing a valid closing tag (i.e., never sending the terminating > character). For example, send </</</</</... in small chunks to keep the buffer growing.</ sequence causes XmlFrameDecoder.decode() to rescan the entire accumulated buffer from the start, consuming increasing amounts of CPU proportional to buffer size (up to maxFrameLength, default 1 MB).</ byte sequences without completing valid XML frames; unusually low data throughput from a connection that remains open for an extended period.XmlFrameDecoder.decode()).io.netty.handler.codec.xml.XmlFrameDecoder.Upgrade to Netty 4.1.136.Final or 4.2.16.Final, which contain the fix for this vulnerability (Netty 4.1.136.Final Release, Netty 4.2.16.Final Release). If an immediate upgrade is not possible, consider placing a network-level rate limiter or connection throttle in front of services using XmlFrameDecoder to limit the rate at which untrusted clients can send data. Additionally, reducing the maxFrameLength configuration to the smallest practical value will limit the maximum buffer size that can be rescanned, reducing the CPU impact per connection.
Source: This report was generated using AI
Free Vulnerability Assessment
Evaluate your cloud security practices across 9 security domains to benchmark your risk level and identify gaps in your defenses.
Get a personalized demo
"Best User Experience I have ever seen, provides full visibility to cloud workloads."
"Wiz provides a single pane of glass to see what is going on in our cloud environments."
"We know that if Wiz identifies something as critical, it actually is."