
Cloud Vulnerability DB
A community-led vulnerabilities database
CVE-2026-75806 is a Denial of Service vulnerability in OpenSSL affecting DTLS 1.2 associations using AEAD cipher suites. An established DTLS 1.2 session can be terminated by a single unauthenticated datagram whose encrypted fragment is shorter than the mandatory explicit IV and authentication tag overhead — without the attacker possessing any key material. Affected OpenSSL versions include 1.1.1 through 1.1.1zj, 3.0.0 through 3.0.23, 3.4.0 through 3.4.8, 3.5.0 through 3.5.9, 3.6.0 through 3.6.5, and 4.0.0 through 4.0.3. The vulnerability was disclosed on September 29, 2026, and carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 5.3 (Medium) (Red Hat Advisory, Red Hat Bugzilla).
The root cause is classified as CWE-1284 (Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input). In the tls1_cipher() function within ssl/record/methods/tls1_meth.c, the receive path invoked EVP_CTRL_AEAD_TLS1_AAD (AEAD processing) before validating that the incoming record was long enough to contain the mandatory explicit IV and authentication tag. When a record is shorter than this combined overhead (eivlen + taglen), the cipher provider rejects the impossible length, and the error path incorrectly raises SSL_AD_INTERNAL_ERROR — a fatal alert that tears down the DTLS association — instead of silently discarding the malformed datagram as the protocol requires. The fix adds a length check (reclen[ctr] < rl->eivlen + rl->taglen) before any AEAD processing, so DTLS silently discards the record and TLS reports bad_record_mac (Red Hat Bugzilla, OpenSSL Commit).
The impact is limited to a Denial of Service against the targeted DTLS 1.2 association. An unauthenticated network attacker who can route a single crafted datagram to an existing DTLS 1.2 session can forcibly terminate that session without knowing any cryptographic key material. There is no memory safety, confidentiality, or integrity impact — the vulnerability cannot be used to decrypt traffic, escalate privileges, or move laterally (Red Hat Bugzilla, Red Hat Advisory).
No public proof-of-concept exploit code is known to exist, and there is no evidence of in-the-wild exploitation at this time (Red Hat Advisory). The vulnerability is network-accessible, requires no privileges or user interaction, and is classified as automatable by NVD SSVC analysis. The EPSS score is approximately 0.387%, reflecting low but non-negligible exploitation probability. The vulnerability is not currently listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog.
application_data with a payload length shorter than the AEAD overhead (e.g., for AES-128-GCM: less than EVP_GCM_TLS_EXPLICIT_IV_LEN + EVP_GCM_TLS_TAG_LEN = 24 bytes). The content does not need to be valid ciphertext.internal_error alert, tearing down the DTLS association (Red Hat Bugzilla, OpenSSL Commit).SSL_AD_INTERNAL_ERROR or internal_error fatal alerts on DTLS connections, particularly from IP addresses not matching the legitimate peer; repeated DTLS session resets in a short time window.SSL_ERROR_SSL errors with internal error codes on the receive path.OpenSSL has released patched versions addressing this vulnerability: 1.1.1zj, 3.0.23, 3.4.8, 3.5.9, 3.6.5, and 4.0.3. Organizations should upgrade to the appropriate fixed version as soon as possible, prioritizing systems that expose DTLS 1.2 services to untrusted networks. No configuration-based workaround is available; upgrading is the only remediation. Downstream distributions including Red Hat, Ubuntu (USN-8847-1), SUSE, openSUSE, Amazon Linux, and Alpine Linux have also released updated packages (OpenSSL Advisory, Red Hat Advisory, Ubuntu Advisory).
The OpenSSL project published a security advisory on September 29, 2026, and released fixes across all supported branches simultaneously (OpenSSL Advisory). Red Hat and Microsoft both issued advisories, and major Linux distributions (Ubuntu, SUSE, openSUSE, Amazon Linux, Alpine) rapidly released updated packages. The Hacker News covered the disclosure, noting it as part of a broader OpenSSL release addressing multiple security fixes (The Hacker News). Community reaction was measured given the limited scope (DoS only, no confidentiality or integrity impact), though the unauthenticated, network-accessible nature of the attack drew attention from security practitioners.
Fix availability across major Linux distributions and their releases.
bionic (esm-apps)
nodejs
bionic (esm-infra)
openssl
bionic (fips-updates)
openssl
bionic (fips)
openssl
devel
openssl
focal (esm-apps)
nodejs
focal (esm-infra)
openssl
focal (fips-updates)
openssl
OpenShift
openshift/ose-rhel-coreos-8
RHEL 8
openssl.src
RHEL 9
compat-openssl11.src
RHEL 10
openssl.src
Source: This report was generated using AI
Free Vulnerability Assessment
Evaluate your cloud security practices across 9 security domains to benchmark your risk level and identify gaps in your defenses.
Get a personalized demo
"Best User Experience I have ever seen, provides full visibility to cloud workloads."
"Wiz provides a single pane of glass to see what is going on in our cloud environments."
"We know that if Wiz identifies something as critical, it actually is."