Register for the AI for Security Summit: Join Figma, Perplexity & Wiz

CVE-2026-82071
MongoDB vulnerability analysis and mitigation

Overview

CVE-2026-82071 is an out-of-bounds write vulnerability in MongoDB Server that allows an authenticated user with write privileges to trigger a denial of service or potentially execute arbitrary code. The flaw stems from insufficient validation of storage engine configuration options during collection creation. It affects MongoDB Server versions 8.3.0 through 8.3.8 (fixed in 8.3.9). The vulnerability carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 8.1 (High) and a CVSS v4.0 base score of 7.2 (High) (Feedly, MongoDB Jira).

Technical details

The root cause is classified as CWE-787 (Out-of-bounds Write). An authenticated attacker with write privileges can supply crafted parameters during collection creation that override internal storage metadata, causing the server process to write data outside the bounds of an allocated memory buffer. The attack vector is network-based, requires low privileges, no user interaction, and low attack complexity, making it straightforward to exploit once authenticated. No public proof-of-concept code has been identified at this time (Feedly, MongoDB Jira).

Impact

Successful exploitation results in an out-of-bounds memory write in the MongoDB server process, causing a server crash and denial of service. The integrity impact is rated High, as crafted storage metadata parameters could corrupt internal data structures. While confidentiality impact is assessed as None, the vulnerability carries potential for arbitrary code execution in more advanced exploitation scenarios, which could lead to full server compromise (Feedly).

Exploitability

As of the disclosure date (September 8, 2026), there are no known in-the-wild exploits, no public proof-of-concept code, and no threat actor attribution associated with this vulnerability. The EPSS score is approximately 0.31%, indicating a low probability of exploitation in the near term. The NVD SSVC assessment classifies exploitation as "none" and the vulnerability as non-automatable. It has not been added to the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog (Feedly).

Exploitation steps

  1. Authentication: Obtain valid MongoDB credentials with write privileges to a target MongoDB Server instance running version 8.3.0–8.3.8.
  2. Reconnaissance: Confirm the target version using the db.version() command or by querying the buildInfo command to verify the server is within the affected range.
  3. Craft malicious collection creation request: Construct a createCollection command with specially crafted storage engine configuration options (e.g., within the storageEngine parameter) designed to override internal storage metadata.
  4. Trigger out-of-bounds write: Submit the crafted command to the MongoDB server. The insufficient validation of the supplied parameters causes the server to write outside allocated memory bounds.
  5. Achieve denial of service or further impact: The out-of-bounds write causes the server process to crash (denial of service). In more advanced scenarios, a carefully crafted payload could potentially be leveraged for arbitrary code execution (Feedly, MongoDB Jira).

Indicators of compromise

  • Logs: Unexpected MongoDB server crash logs or segmentation fault entries in mongod.log following a createCollection command with unusual storageEngine parameters.
  • Logs: Audit log entries showing authenticated users issuing createCollection commands with non-standard or malformed storage engine configuration options.
  • Process: Sudden termination or restart of the mongod process without a clear administrative cause.
  • Network: Repeated connection attempts from the same authenticated client shortly after server restarts, potentially indicating crash-loop exploitation attempts.

Mitigation and workarounds

MongoDB has released version 8.3.9 to address this vulnerability; upgrading to this version or later is the recommended remediation. Organizations unable to upgrade immediately should restrict write access to MongoDB instances to only trusted and necessary users, minimizing the attack surface. Additionally, network-level controls such as firewalls and VPNs should be used to limit exposure of MongoDB instances to untrusted networks (Feedly, MongoDB Jira).

Community reactions

Coverage of CVE-2026-82071 has been limited to automated vulnerability aggregation platforms such as VulDB, CVEFeed, and SecurityOnline shortly after disclosure. No notable researcher commentary, vendor blog posts, or significant social media discussion has been identified beyond standard CVE tracking (Feedly).

Additional resources

Linux Distribution fix status

Fix availability across major Linux distributions and their releases.

Ubuntu

Unknown

bionic (esm-apps)

mongodb

Unknown

focal (esm-apps)

mongodb

Unknown

trusty (esm-infra-legacy)

mongodb

Unknown

xenial (esm-apps-legacy)

mongodb

Unknown

SourceThis report was generated using AI

Related MongoDB vulnerabilities:

CVE ID

Severity

Score

Technologies

Component name

CISA KEV exploit

Has fix

Published date

CVE-2026-82075HIGH8.7
  • MongoDB logoMongoDB
  • mongod-8.3
NoYesSep 08, 2026
CVE-2026-89099HIGH7.7
  • MongoDB logoMongoDB
  • cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb
NoYesSep 11, 2026
CVE-2026-82076HIGH7.1
  • MongoDB logoMongoDB
  • mongod-7.0
NoYesSep 08, 2026
CVE-2026-82074HIGH7.1
  • MongoDB logoMongoDB
  • cpe:2.3:a:mongodb:mongodb
NoYesSep 08, 2026
CVE-2026-88035MEDIUM5.7
  • MongoDB logoMongoDB
  • mongo-c-driver
NoYesSep 10, 2026

Free Vulnerability Assessment

Benchmark your Cloud Security Posture

Evaluate your cloud security practices across 9 security domains to benchmark your risk level and identify gaps in your defenses.

Request assessment

Get a personalized demo

Ready to see Wiz in action?

"Best User Experience I have ever seen, provides full visibility to cloud workloads."
David EstlickCISO
"Wiz provides a single pane of glass to see what is going on in our cloud environments."
Adam FletcherChief Security Officer
"We know that if Wiz identifies something as critical, it actually is."
Greg PoniatowskiHead of Threat and Vulnerability Management