Vulnerability DatabaseGHSA-8847-338w-5hcj

GHSA-8847-338w-5hcj
JavaScript vulnerability analysis and mitigation

Summary

Versions of i18next-fs-backend prior to 2.6.4 interpolate the caller-supplied lng and ns values directly into the configured loadPath and addPath templates with no path-component validation and no sanitisation. When an application exposes the resolved language code to user-controlled input (?lng= query parameter, cookie, request header), a crafted value can break out of the intended locale directory. Affected call sites in lib/index.js:

  • read (line 38 pre-patch): const filename = interpolate(loadPath, { lng: language, ns: namespace })
  • removeFile (line 101 pre-patch): same pattern against addPath
  • writeFile (line 127 pre-patch): same pattern against addPath for queued missing-key writes The helper interpolate in lib/utils.js substitutes raw values with no encoding — unlike the addQueryString helper in i18next-http-backend, there is no equivalent safety for path interpolation.

Impact

  • Arbitrary file read. With a loadPath like /locales/{{lng}}/{{ns}}.json, an attacker-controlled lng = '../../etc' (and matching ns) causes the backend to read a file outside the locale directory. For parsers that tolerate arbitrary content (YAML's freeform text), the file contents surface as a translation resource.
  • Arbitrary file overwrite. addPath is interpolated the same way for missing-key writes (the create() code path and the debounced writer in writeFile). A traversing lng/ns combination can cause the process to write JSON structures to an unintended filesystem location, potentially overwriting application files if the process user has write access.
  • Chain with .js/.ts eval. i18next-fs-backend supports loading .js and .ts locale files by eval-ing their content (intentional feature, documented as requiring trusted sources). Combining traversal with that path — for example lng = '../../../app/config' against loadPath: '/locales/{{lng}}/{{ns}}.js' — would cause the backend to execute a server-side file as JavaScript, exfiltrating whatever it can touch (process.env, connected services). Exploitation requires the application to pass an untrusted lng/ns value through to i18next.t() without its own validation. Many i18next setups do exactly this via i18next-browser-languagedetector (query string / cookie detection).

Affected versions

All versions of i18next-fs-backend prior to 2.6.4.

Patch

Fixed in 2.6.4. lib/utils.js now exports:

  • isSafePathSegment(v) — returns true only if v is a non-empty string of ≤ 128 chars that does not contain .., /, \, control characters, or a prototype key (__proto__, constructor, prototype). Legitimate i18next language-code shapes (BCP-47, en_US, zh-Hant-HK, pirate-speak, my-custom.ns, +-joined multi-language values) all pass.
  • interpolatePath(template, data) — substitutes variables like the existing interpolate but refuses the whole result if any segment fails isSafePathSegment. Callers bail out with an error (read) or silently drop the queued write (writeFile, removeFile). The .js / .ts eval behaviour is intentionally retained — dynamic expressions in locale files are a documented feature of this backend, and safe replacements like dynamic import() are async-only and incompatible with this backend's sync-capable code path. The README has a new "Security considerations" section that spells out the trust model: .js/.ts locale files must be treated as code.

Workarounds

No workaround short of upgrading. If you cannot upgrade immediately, sanitise lng / ns at your application boundary before passing them to i18next — reject values containing .., /, \, control characters, and cap the length.

Credits

Discovered via an internal security audit of the i18next ecosystem.


SourceNVD

Related JavaScript vulnerabilities:

CVE ID

Severity

Score

Technologies

Component name

CISA KEV exploit

Has fix

Published date

CVE-2026-88062CRITICAL9.5
  • JavaScript logoJavaScript
  • omniroute
NoNoSep 10, 2026
CVE-2026-61534CRITICAL9.1
  • JavaScript logoJavaScript
  • yayson
NoYesSep 11, 2026
CVE-2026-59973HIGH8.5
  • JavaScript logoJavaScript
  • @frontmcp/adapters
NoYesSep 11, 2026
CVE-2026-59960HIGH7.5
  • JavaScript logoJavaScript
  • @argos-ci/core
NoYesSep 10, 2026
CVE-2026-59965HIGH7.1
  • JavaScript logoJavaScript
  • @jhb.software/payload-alt-text-plugin
NoNoSep 10, 2026

Free Vulnerability Assessment

Benchmark your Cloud Security Posture

Evaluate your cloud security practices across 9 security domains to benchmark your risk level and identify gaps in your defenses.

Request assessment

Get a personalized demo

Ready to see Wiz in action?

"Best User Experience I have ever seen, provides full visibility to cloud workloads."
David EstlickCISO
"Wiz provides a single pane of glass to see what is going on in our cloud environments."
Adam FletcherChief Security Officer
"We know that if Wiz identifies something as critical, it actually is."
Greg PoniatowskiHead of Threat and Vulnerability Management