Vulnerability DatabaseGHSA-9m75-vc3g-4x39

GHSA-9m75-vc3g-4x39: 
Python vulnerability analysis and mitigation

Summary

In pyasn1 0.6.4 and earlier, decoding a constructed OCTET STRING or character string made of many fragments can spend disproportionate CPU time repeatedly copying the accumulated value. A separate indefinite-length ANY path has the same problem while collecting the encoded components. The work grows roughly quadratically with the number of fixed-size fragments, although the input and decoded value grow linearly. An application that lets an attacker supply such ASN.1 input to an affected decoder can suffer CPU exhaustion. The affected string paths are available in BER and CER. The DER decoder also accepts certain non-DER constructed strings: a definite-length constructed OCTET STRING when an asn1Spec selects univ.OctetString, and constructed character strings such as UTF8String even without a schema. Indefinite-length ANY is affected in BER and CER when an asn1Spec selects univ.Any; DER rejects indefinite lengths. This is a distinct decoder path from the OBJECT IDENTIFIER/RELATIVE-OID accumulation addressed by CVE-2026-59885. It has the same complexity class, but the OID fix in 0.6.4 did not change these string or ANY loops.

Technical details

In the v0.6.4 BER decoder, OctetStringPayloadDecoder appends each decoded fragment to a growing bytes value with header += component in both its definite-length and indefinite-length constructed forms. AnyPayloadDecoder.indefLenValueDecoder similarly uses chunk += component. In the exercised paths, each concatenation copies an increasingly large prefix. For N fixed-size fragments, the total copied data grows with 1 + 2 + ... + N, or O(N²). The OCTET STRING decoder is also the base class of the decoders for UTF8String, NumericString, PrintableString, TeletexString, VideotexString, IA5String, GraphicString, VisibleString, GeneralString, UniversalString, BMPString, ObjectDescriptor, GeneralizedTime, and UTCTime. These types inherit the same constructed-string reassembly path. The DER decoder's OCTET STRING restriction replaces the tag-driven decoder, but its schema-driven TYPE_MAP retains the BER-derived decoder. Thus der.decode(data) rejects a constructed OCTET STRING, while der.decode(data, asn1Spec=univ.OctetString()) accepts its definite-length form and reaches the accumulation loop. DER does not replace the inherited character-string decoders, so a constructed UTF8String is also accepted without asn1Spec. These inputs violate X.690's DER string-encoding rule and should not be described as valid DER encodings. The original short-fragment, definite-length OCTET STRING reproducer is valid BER. The CER decoder accepts it, but it is not a conforming CER string encoding: X.690 requires an indefinite-length outer constructed string and 1,000 contents octets per fragment except possibly the last. A conforming CER-shaped constructed OCTET STRING with those fragment sizes also reaches the loop and shows quadratic growth. The indefinite-length ANY reproducer below can represent a CER SEQUENCE OF OCTET STRING and reaches the separate ANY loop when decoded with an ANY schema. The decoder's eight-octet length-field limit and nesting-depth limit do not bound the number of sibling fragments in these examples. The BER reproducer below uses only a three-octet outer length field; all fragments have shallow nesting. There is no per-message fragment-count cap in v0.6.4.

Impact

If an application passes attacker-controlled ASN.1 to the affected decode() or StreamingDecoder path without an adequate input or resource limit, a megabyte-scale value can occupy a decoding worker for seconds. Repeated inputs can exhaust available CPU. Whether this is reachable before authentication, or through a particular protocol, depends on the application; the library finding alone does not establish those conditions. No confidentiality or integrity impact is claimed.

Severity assessment (CVSS v3.1)

The 7.5 Base score assumes a reasonable application that automatically decodes attacker-supplied ASN.1 from unauthenticated network input. Valid BER and conforming CER inputs trigger the string-reassembly issue without special conditions, privileges, or user interaction. Repeated crafted inputs could occupy all available decoder workers and deny service while the attack continues. No confidentiality or integrity impact is demonstrated. This library-level score does not assert that every adopter has such an endpoint or loses all service; deployment-specific input limits and architecture may change the score. See FIRST's library-scoring guidance. On the official v0.6.4 tag, local CPU-time measurements with CPython 3.14.8 on macOS arm64 gave the following results. Times vary by machine and Python runtime; the input-size scaling is the relevant observation. “Fixed” means the local 0.6.5 decoder fix applied to the same inputs.

Decoder path and inputFragmentsv0.6.4 CPUFixed CPU
BER constructed OCTET STRING, 0.40 MB100,000 × 2 payload bytes0.340 s0.160 s
BER constructed OCTET STRING, 0.80 MB200,000 × 2 payload bytes0.886 s0.312 s
BER constructed OCTET STRING, 1.60 MB400,000 × 2 payload bytes2.738 s0.623 s
BER indefinite ANY, 0.30 MB100,000 × 1 payload byte0.459 s0.206 s
BER indefinite ANY, 0.60 MB200,000 × 1 payload byte1.245 s0.412 s
BER indefinite ANY, 1.20 MB400,000 × 1 payload byte3.980 s0.826 s
CER constructed OCTET STRING, 1.00 MB, conforming fragment layout1,000 × 1,000 payload bytes0.0089 s0.0022 s
CER constructed OCTET STRING, 2.01 MB, conforming fragment layout2,000 × 1,000 payload bytes0.0311 s0.0044 s
CER constructed OCTET STRING, 4.02 MB, conforming fragment layout4,000 × 1,000 payload bytes0.1379 s0.0090 s
For the same short-fragment layout, the original report measured up to 16.05 seconds for a 3.2 MB BER constructed OCTET STRING. An independent report on CPython 3.11.16/Linux measured 5.76 seconds for a 2.4 MB constructed OCTET STRING, versus about 0.005 seconds for a primitive OCTET STRING of comparable size. These are reporter measurements on different systems, not fixed performance guarantees.

Reproduction

This example uses public decoder APIs. Run it with pyasn1 0.6.4 and increase n to observe the scaling. The final two calls show the DER paths accepted by v0.6.4; their constructed encodings are not valid DER.

import time
from pyasn1.codec.ber import decoder as ber
from pyasn1.codec.cer import decoder as cer
from pyasn1.codec.der import decoder as der
from pyasn1.type import univ
def tlv(identifier, contents):
    length = len(contents)
    if length < 128:
        return bytes((identifier, length)) + contents
    encoded = length.to_bytes((length.bit_length() + 7) // 8, "big")
    return bytes((identifier, 0x80 | len(encoded))) + encoded + contents
def measure(label, decode, substrate, asn1Spec=None):
    start = time.process_time()
    _, rest = decode(substrate, asn1Spec=asn1Spec)
    assert not rest
    print(f"{label}: {len(substrate)} input bytes, "
          f"{time.process_time() - start:.3f} CPU seconds")
n = 100_000
octet_fragments = b"\x04\x02AA" * n
utf8_fragments = b"\x0c\x02AA" * n
measure("BER constructed OCTET STRING", ber.decode,
        tlv(0x24, octet_fragments))
measure("BER indefinite ANY", ber.decode,
        b"\x30\x80" + b"\x04\x01A" * n + b"\x00\x00",
        univ.Any())

# CER uses indefinite length and 1,000-content-octet primitive fragments.
cer_fragment = tlv(0x04, b"A" * 1000)
measure("CER constructed OCTET STRING", cer.decode,
        b"\x24\x80" + cer_fragment * 1000 + b"\x00\x00")

# These constructed encodings are accepted by pyasn1 but are invalid DER.
measure("DER OCTET STRING with schema", der.decode,
        tlv(0x24, octet_fragments), univ.OctetString())
measure("DER UTF8String without schema", der.decode,
        tlv(0x2c, utf8_fragments))

Patch

pyasn1 0.6.5 replaces the growing bytes accumulator with a list of fragments and joins them once after decoding in all three affected loops. The OCTET STRING base-class change also covers the inheriting character-string decoders. This removes the repeated copying while preserving the assembled decoded value.

Workaround

Until upgrading, enforce application-appropriate limits on the size of untrusted ASN.1 input before passing it to pyasn1, and limit the CPU resources available to decoding workers. Applications that require DER can also reject constructed string encodings before invoking the decoder. The appropriate byte limit depends on the protocol and expected valid values.

Credits and references

Reported by alimony. Independently reported by manus-pi, whose report identified the schema-driven DER route, inherited character-string decoders, and additional performance evidence.


Source: NVD

Related Python vulnerabilities:

CVE ID

Severity

Score

Technologies

Component name

CISA KEV exploit

Has fix

Published date

GHSA-mm57-4v3p-rchxHIGH7.5
  • Python logoPython
  • pyasn1
NoYesOct 27, 2026
GHSA-2qm8-x737-gmw5HIGH7.5
  • Python logoPython
  • pyasn1
NoYesOct 27, 2026
GHSA-fm9c-5rcf-2q5pHIGH7.5
  • Python logoPython
  • pyasn1
NoYesOct 27, 2026
GHSA-9m75-vc3g-4x39HIGH7.5
  • Python logoPython
  • pyasn1
NoYesOct 27, 2026
GHSA-4prv-5hj7-c2xrHIGH7
  • Python logoPython
  • diffusers
NoYesOct 27, 2026

Free Vulnerability Assessment

Benchmark your Cloud Security Posture

Evaluate your cloud security practices across 9 security domains to benchmark your risk level and identify gaps in your defenses.

Request assessment

Additional Wiz resources

Get a personalized demo

Ready to see Wiz in action?

"Best User Experience I have ever seen, provides full visibility to cloud workloads."
David EstlickCISO
"Wiz provides a single pane of glass to see what is going on in our cloud environments."
Adam FletcherChief Security Officer
"We know that if Wiz identifies something as critical, it actually is."
Greg PoniatowskiHead of Threat and Vulnerability Management